Munich Personal RePEc Archive
Login | Create Account

Measurement Error in Monetary Aggregates: A Markov Switching Factor Approach

Barnett, William A.; Chauvet, Marcelle and Tierney, Heather L. R. (2008): Measurement Error in Monetary Aggregates: A Markov Switching Factor Approach. Unpublished.

This is the latest version of this item.

[img]
Preview
PDF - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
506Kb

Abstract

This paper compares the different dynamics of the simple sum monetary aggregates and the Divisia monetary aggregate indexes over time, over the business cycle, and across high and low inflation and interest rate phases. Although traditional comparisons of the series sometimes suggest that simple sum and Divisia monetary aggregates share similar dynamics, there are important differences during certain periods, such as around turning points. These differences cannot be evaluated by their average behavior. We use a factor model with regime switching. The model separates out the common movements underlying the monetary aggregate indexes, summarized in the dynamic factor, from individual variations in each individual series, captured by the idiosyncratic terms. The idiosyncratic terms and the measurement errors reveal where the monetary indexes differ. We find several new results. In general, the idiosyncratic terms for both the simple sum aggregates and the Divisia indexes display a business cycle pattern, especially since 1980. They generally rise around the end of high interest rate phases – a couple of quarters before the beginning of recessions – and fall during recessions to subsequently converge to their average in the beginning of expansions. We find that the major differences between the simple sum aggregates and Divisia indexes occur around the beginnings and ends of economic recessions, and during some high interest rate phases. We note the inferences’ policy relevance, which is particularly dramatic at the broadest (M3) level of aggregation. Indeed, as Belongia (1996) has observed in this regard, “measurement matters.”

Item Type:MPRA Paper
Language:English
Keywords:Measurement Error, Divisia Index, Aggregation, State Space, Markov Switching, Monetary Policy
Subjects:E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E5 - Monetary Policy, Central Banking, and the Supply of Money and Credit > E51 - Money Supply; Credit; Money Multipliers
C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C3 - Econometric Methods: Multiple; Simultaneous Equation Models; Multiple Variables; Endogenous Regressors > C30 - General
E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E4 - Money and Interest Rates
ID Code:10179
Deposited By:William A. Barnett
Deposited On:26. Aug 2008 10:05
Last Modified:26. Aug 2008 10:05
References:

Anderson, R., B. Jones, and T. Nesmith , 1997a, “Introduction to the St. Louis Monetary Services Index Project,” Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, January/February, Vol. 79, No.1, 25-30.

Anderson, R., B. Jones, and T. Nesmith, 1997b, “Building New Monetary Services Indexes: Concepts Data and Methods,” Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, January/February, Vol. 79, No.1, 53-82.

Barnett, W.A., 1982, “The Optimal Level of Monetary Aggregation,” Jornal of Money Credit and Banking, v. 14, No. 4.

Barnett, W.A., M. Hinich, and P. Yue, 1991, “Monitoring Monetary Aggregates under Risk Aversion,” Monetary Policy on the 75th Anniversary of the Federal Reserve System, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, 189-222.

Barnett, W.A., A.R. Gallant, M.J. Hinich, J. Jungeilges, D. Kaplan, and M.J. Jensen, 1995, “Robustness of Nonlinearity and Chaos Tests to Measurement Error, Inference Method, and Sample Size,” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 27, 301-320.

Barnett, W.A., M. Hinich, and P. Yue, 2000, “The Exact Theoretical Rational Expectations Monetary Aggregate,” Macroeconomic Dynamics, v. 4, No. 2, 197-221.

Barnett, W. A. and A. Serletis (eds), 2000, “The Theory of Monetary Aggregation,” Contributions to Economic Analysis Monograph Series, Elsevier.

Belongia, M., 1996, “Measurement Matters: Recent Results from Monetary Economics Reexamined,” Journal of Political Economy, v. 104, No. 5, 1065-1083.

Belongia, M. and J. Binner (eds), 2000, “Divisia Monetary Aggregates: Theory and Practice,” Palgrave.

Belongia, M. and P. Ireland, 2006, “The Own-Price of Money and the Channels of Monetary Transmission,” Journal of Money Credit and Banking, 38, No. 2, 429-445.

Bry, G., and C. Boschan, 1971, Cyclical Analysis of Times Series: Selected Procedures and Computer Programs, (New York: National Bureau of Economic Research).

Chauvet, M., 1998, “An Econometric Characterization of Business Cycle Dynamics with Factor Structure and Regime Switches,” International Economic Review, Vol. 39, No. 4, November, 969-96.

Chauvet, M., 2001, “A Monthly Indicator of Brazilian GDP,” in Brazilian Review of Econometrics Vol. 21, No. 1.

Hicks, J. R., 1946, “Value and Capital,” Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Jones, B.E. and T.D. Nesmith, 1997, “The Monetary Services Indexes,” mimeo, Washington University Saint Louis.

Kim, C.J. and C. Nelson, 1998, “State-Space Models with Regime-Switching: Classical and Gibbs-Sampling Approaches with Applications,” The MIT Press.

Serletis, A. (ed.), 2006, “Money and the Economy,” World Scientific.

Schunk, D., 2001, “The Relative Forecasting Performance of the Divisia and Simple Sum Monetary Aggregates,” Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 33, No. 2, 272-283.

Available Versions of this Item

All papers reproduced by permission. Reproduction and distribution subject to the approval of the copyright owners.
Repository Staff Only: item control page

LMU-Logo
MPRA is a RePEc service hosted by
the Munich University Library in Germany.