Mamoon, Dawood and S. Mansoob, Murshed (2008): On the Conflict Mitigating Effects of Trade: The India-Pakistan Case.
Download (184kB) | Preview
We examine whether greater inter-state trade, democracy and reduced military spending lower belligerence between India and Pakistan. We begin with theoretical models covering the opportunity costs of conflict in terms of trade losses and security spending, as well as the costs of making concessions to rivals. Conflict between the two nations can be best understood in a multivariate framework where variables such as economic performance, integration with rest of the world, bilateral trade, military expenditure, democracy scores and population are simultaneously considered. Our empirical investigation based on time series econometrics from 1950-2005 suggests that reduced bilateral trade, greater military expenditure, less development expenditure, lower levels of democracy, lower growth rates and less general trade openness are all conflict enhancing. Globalization, or a greater openness to international trade with the rest of the world, is the most significant driver of a liberal peace, rather than a common democratic orientation suggested by the pure form of the democratic peace.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||On the Conflict Mitigating Effects of Trade: The India-Pakistan Case|
|Keywords:||Inter-state conflict and trade, democracy and conflict, conflict and economic development|
|Subjects:||F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F15 - Economic Integration
F - International Economics > F5 - International Relations and International Political Economy > F52 - National Security; Economic Nationalism
F - International Economics > F5 - International Relations and International Political Economy > F51 - International Conflicts; Negotiations; Sanctions
C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C7 - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory
|Depositing User:||Dawood Mamoon|
|Date Deposited:||13. Sep 2008 00:44|
|Last Modified:||20. Feb 2013 17:58|
Angell-Lane, Ralph Norman (1910) The Great Illusion: A Study of the Relation of Military Power in Nations to Their Economic and Social Advantage, London: Heinemann Barbieri, Katherine (1996) Economic Interdependence: A Path to Peace or a Source of Intersate Conflict?’, Journal of Peace Research, 33 (1): 29-49.
Deger, Saadet and Somnath Sen (1990) ‘Military Security and the Economy: Defence Expenditure in India and Pakistan in Keith Hartley and Todd Sandler (eds) The Economics of Defence Spending, London: Routledge: 189-227.
Elliot, Graham, Thomas Rothenberg, and James Stock (1996) ‘Efficient Tests for an Autoregressive Unit Root’, Econometrica, 64: 813-836.
Faten, Ghosn Glenn Palmer, and Stuart Bremer (2004) "The MID3 Data Set, 1993–2001: Procedures, Coding Rules, and Description." Conflict Management and Peace Science, 21:133-154.
Granger, Clive (1969) ‘Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-Spectral Methods’, Econometrica, 37: 424-438.
Harbom, Lotta, Stina Högbladh and Peter Wallensteen (2006) ‘Armed Conflict and Peace Agreements’, Journal of Peace Research, 43 (5): 617-631.
Hegre, Håvard (2000) ‘Development and the Liberal Peace: What Does It Take to Be a Trading State’, Journal of Peace Research, 37 (1): 5-30.
International Financial Statistics (2006) International Monetary Fund, Washington D.C. Kant, Immanuel (1795) Perpetual Peace and Other Essays on Politics, History and Morals, reprinted 1983, Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing. Lipset, Seymour (1960) Political Man: The Social Bases of Politics, New York: Doubleday. Montesquieu, Charles-Louis de (1748) De l’Espirit des Lois, reprinted, Paris: Flammarion, 1979. Murshed, Syed Mansoob and Dawood Mamoon (2007) ‘On the Costs of not Loving thy neighbour as thyself: The Trade, Democracy and Military Expenditure Explanations behind India-Pakistan Rivalry’, ISS Working paper no. 446, www.iss.nl.
Oneal, John and Bruce Russett (1999) ‘Assessing the Liberal Peace with Alternative Specifications: Trade Still Reduces Conflict’, Journal of Peace Research, 36 (4): 423-32.
Polachek, Solomon W (1997) ‘Why Democracies Cooperate More and Fight Less: The Relationship Between International trade and Cooperation’, Review of International Economics, 5(3): 295-309.
Polachek, Solomon W and Carlos Seiglie (2006) ‘Trade, Peace and Democracy: An Analysis of Dyadic Dispute’, IZA DO No. 2170.
Polity IV Project (Center for International Development and Conflict Management), http://www.cidcm.umd.edu/polity.
Rawls, John (1999) The Law of Peoples, Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
Sims, Chris (1980) ‘Macroeconomics and Reality’, Econometrica, 48: 1-48.
World Development Indicators (2006), World Bank, Washington D.C