Islam, Rafikul (2005): MBNQA criteria in education: Assigning weights from a Malaysian perspective and proposition of an alternative evaluation scheme. Published in: International Transactions in Operational Research , Vol. 14, (2007): pp. 373-394.
Download (182kB) | Preview
In order to improve quality and productivity among American companies, Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award (MBNQA) was launched by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) under the Department of Commerce of US government in 1987. Over the years, the award has been proved to be effective in improving companies’ market share, customer satisfaction, employee morals and also profitability. MBNQA has been a ‘role model’ in developing national quality award for many other countries in the world. Furthermore, for organizational self-assessment, the criteria framework of MBNQA has been in use throughout the world. Presently, the award is offered in three categories: Business, Education, and Health-care. The present paper is concerned with MBNQA in Education. NIST has developed a comprehensive set of criteria to be fulfilled in order to be eligible to win the award. However, in the existing literature, it is not clear how the weights are assigned to the criteria and subcriteria. The present paper uses analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to reassign criteria weights from a Malaysian perspective. Furthermore, the paper points out the fallacy of the present evaluation scheme and proposes an alternative one based upon the absolute measurement procedure of AHP. The modified scheme is expected to enhance the fairness in evaluation of the award aspirants. The paper also shares the experiences gathered in data collection using AHP.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||MBNQA criteria in education: Assigning weights from a Malaysian perspective and proposition of an alternative evaluation scheme|
|Keywords:||Malcolm Baldrige national quality award, total quality management, analytic hierarchy process, evaluation|
|Subjects:||M - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting > M1 - Business Administration > M11 - Production Management|
|Depositing User:||RAFIKUL ISLAM|
|Date Deposited:||29. Sep 2008 03:19|
|Last Modified:||12. Feb 2013 18:32|
Babicz, G. (2002) Assessing the Baldrige award. Quality, November 02, 36-39.
Baldrige National Quality Program (2005a). Education Criteria for Performance Excellence, National Institute of Standards and Technology, US Department of Commerce. Available at <www.baldrige.nist.gov>.
Baldrige National Quality Program (2005b). Getting started. National Institute of Standards and Technology, US Department of Commerce. Available at <www.baldrige.nist.gov>.
Basak, I. and Saaty, T.L. (1993). Group decision making using the analytic hierarchy process. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 17:101-109.
Brown, M.G. (1997). Measuring up against the 1997 Baldrige criteria. Journal of Quality and Participation, 20(4):22-28.
Collier, D.A. (1992). Service, please: the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award. Business Horizons, July-August: 88-95.
Curkovic, S., Melnyk, S., Calantone, R., and Handfield, R. (2000). Validating the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award framework through structural equation modeling. International Journal of Production Research, 38(4): 765-791.
Fisher, C., Dauterive, J., and Barfield, J. (2001). Economic impacts of quality awards: does offering an award bring returns to the state? Total Quality Management, 12(7&8): 981-987.
Garvin, D.A. (1991). How the Baldrige award really works. Harvard Business Review, November-December: 80-93.
Ghobadian, A. and Woo, H.S. (1996). Characteristics, benefits and shortcomings of four major quality awards. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 13(2): 10-44.
Goldstein, S.M. and Schweikhart, S.B. (2002). Empirical support for the Baldrige award framework in US hospitals. Health Care Management Review, 27(1): 62-75.
Handfield, R.B., and Ghosh, S. (1995). An empirical test of linkages between the Baldrige criteria and financial performance. Proceedings of the Decision Sciences Institute Annual Meetings: 1713-1715.
Johnson, H.H. (1996). The Baldrige and state quality awards for education. The Journal for Quality and Participation, 19(1): 88-92.
Leach, K.E. (1994). Lessons from the Baldrige. Industry Week, September 19: 42.
Prybutok, V.R., Richards, R.M., and Cutshall, R. (2001). The significance of information and analysis as a component of a leadership model based on Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award criteria. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 41(4): 52-56.
Prybutok, V.R. and Stafford, M.R. (1997). Using Baldrige criteria for self-assessment. Marketing Health Services, 45-48.
Puay, S.H., Tan, K.C., Xic, M., and Goh, T.N. (1998). A comparative study of nine national quality awards. The TQM Magazine, 10(1): 30-39.
Reimann, C.W. and Herz, H.S. (1996). The Baldrige award and ISO 9000 registration compared. The Journal of Quality and Participation, 19(1): 12-19.
Saaty, T.L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill, New York.
Saaty, T.L. (1990). How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research, 48: 9-26.
Saaty, T.L. and Forman, E.H. (2000). Expert Choice – Advanced Decision Support Systems Software, Pittsburgh, Expert Choice, Inc.
Seymour, D. and Associates (1996). High Performing Colleges: The Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award As A Framework for Improving Higher Education. Marvills, OH, Prescott Publishing.
Steeples, M.M. (1993). The Corporate Guide to the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award. Home wood, IL, Business one-Irwin.
Wilson, D.D. and Collier, D.A. (2000). An empirical investigation of the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award causal model. Decision Science, 32(2): 361-390.