Evaluation of the effect of policy regime shifts in Iranian Distributional changes using a Micro Simulation Framework

Khiabani, Nasser and Maziyaki, Ali (2008): Evaluation of the effect of policy regime shifts in Iranian Distributional changes using a Micro Simulation Framework. Unpublished.

Abstract

Improvement in incomes distribution has been one of the major targets of Iranian policy makers; however, during 1991 to 2004, policy regimes have shifted frequently, and evaluation of the effect of policy regime shifts in Iran’s distributional changes due to these policy regime shifts could be illuminating. In this paper, we’ve established a method which computes the effect of policy regime shifts in households’ and individuals’ incomes. This method is based on a micro simulation framework developed by Bourguignon and Ferreira in 2004; moreover, we benefited from work by Heckman on Sample Selection Bias. Finally, we have compared two successive years on each instance of policy shift. Results of micro-simulation show Iranian distributive policies wouldn’t have expected effects to higher and lower deciles of incomes; in other words, government attempts in equalizing incomes haven’t met their aim.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: income distribution, micro simulation, Heckman’s method
• Subjects: B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B2 - History of Economic Thought since 1925 > B21 - Microeconomics; D - Microeconomics > D3 - Distribution > D31 - Personal Income, Wealth, and Their Distributions; D - Microeconomics > D3 - Distribution > D33 - Factor Income Distribution; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C3 - Econometric Methods: Multiple; Simultaneous Equation Models; Multiple Variables; Endogenous Regressors > C31 - Cross-Sectional Models; Spatial Models; Treatment Effect Models; Quantile Regressions

References

[1] A.Alesina, D.Rodrik "Distributive Politics and Economic Growth" The Quarterly Journal of Economics, MIT Press, Vol.109 (2), May 1994, 465-490

[2] C.E.Vélez, J. Leibovich, A. Kúgler, C. Bouillón, and J. Núñez. 2001 “The Reversal of Inequality Trends in Colombia, 1978-1995: A Combination of Persistent and Fluctuating Forces” Mimeo. The World Bank, Washington, DC

[3] D.Bravo, D.Contreras, T.Rau, S.Urzua “Income Distribution in Chile 1990-1998: Learning from Microeconomic Simulation”May 2000

[4] D.Dollar, A.Kraay "Growth Is Good for the Poor" Journal of Economic Growth, Springer, vol. 7(3), September 2002, 195-225

[5] F.Bourguignon, N.Ferreira, N.Lusting “The Microeconomic of income distribution Dynamics In East Asia and Latin America” A co publication of the World Bank and Oxford University Press, September 2004

[6] J.Heckman “Sample selection Bias as a specification error” Econometrica, Vol.74, No. 1, January1979, 153-161

[7] K. J. Forbes "A Reassessment of the Relationship between Inequality and Growth" American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 90(4), September 2000, 869-887

[8] M.Tabibian et. al. “Analyzing level of welfare, poverty and income distribution in the years between 1985 and 1995” A Persian publication of Institute for Research on Planning and Development(IRPD), July 1999