Taylor, Mark Zachary (2007): Political decentralization and technological innovation: testing the innovative advantages of decentralized states. Published in: Review of Policy Research , Vol. 3, No. 24 (2007): pp. 231-257.
Download (188Kb) | Preview
Although never rigorously tested, it has become a sort of accepted wisdom amongst social scientists that government decentralization offers key advantages for innovators. Decentralized governments are widely seen as agile, competitive, and well structured to adapt to innovation’s gale of creative destruction. Meanwhile, centralized states, even when democratic, have come to be viewed as rigid and thus hostile to the risks, costs, and change associated with new technology; or are subject to capture by status-quo interest groups which use their influence to promote policies which ultimately restrict technological change. Therefore decentralized government is often perceived as a necessary institutional foundation for encouraging long-run technological innovation. In the following article, this wisdom is tested using data on international patent activity, scientific publications, and high-technology exports. The results suggest that the supposed technological advantages of decentralized states are a fiction, and that international pressures may be more important.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Political decentralization and technological innovation: testing the innovative advantages of decentralized states|
|Keywords:||technology; innovation; decentralization; federalism; patents; technological; invention|
|Subjects:||O - Economic Development, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O11 - Macroeconomic Analyses of Economic Development
O - Economic Development, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Technological Change; Research and Development; Intellectual Property Rights > O38 - Government Policy
H - Public Economics > H1 - Structure and Scope of Government
O - Economic Development, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Technological Change; Research and Development; Intellectual Property Rights > O31 - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives
O - Economic Development, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O14 - Industrialization; Manufacturing and Service Industries; Choice of Technology
|Depositing User:||Mark Zachary Taylor|
|Date Deposited:||10. Oct 2008 07:15|
|Last Modified:||13. Feb 2013 03:19|
Acemoglu, D., Aghion, P., Lelarge C., Van Reenen, H., & Zilibotti, F. 2006. Technology, Information, and the Decentralization of the Firm. Working Paper 12206. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., & Robinson, J. 2005. Institutions as the Fundamental Cause of Long-Run Growth. In Aghion, P. & Durlauf, S. (Eds.) Handbook of Economic Growth (pp. 385-472). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Achen, C. 2000. Why Lagged Dependent Variables Can Suppress the Explanatory Power of Other Independent Variables. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Political Methodology Section of APSA 2000.
Amsden, A. H. & Mourshed, M. 1997. Scientific Publications, Patents and Technological Capabilities in Late-Industrializing Countries. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management 9(3).
Armijo, L. & Jah, P.S. 2000. Centre-State Relations in India and Brazil: Privatisation of Electricity and Banking. In Kahkonen, S & Lanyi, A. (Eds.) Institutions, Incentives and Economic Reforms in India. New Delhi: Sage Publications.
Arrow, K. 1962. Economics of Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention. In Nelson, R.R. (Ed.) The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity (pp. 609-626). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Barre, R., Gibbons, M., Maddox, J., Martin, B., & Papon P. (Eds.). 1997. Science in Tomorrow’s Europe. Paris: Economica International.
Blomstrom, M. & Wolff, E.N. 1994. Multinational Corporations and Productivity Convergence in Mexico. In Baumol, W., Nelson R.R, & Wolff, E. (Eds.). Convergence of Productivity: Cross-National Studies and Historical Evidence. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Bourke, P. & Butler, L. 1996. Publication Types, Citation Rates, and Evaluation. Scientometrics 37 (3), 473-494.
Breznitz, D. 2007. Innovation and the State: Political Choice and Strategies for Growth in Israel, Taiwan, and Ireland. New Haven CT: Yale University Press.
Carroll, P. 1993. Big Blues: The Unmaking of IBM. New York: Crown Publishers.
Cary, W.L. 1974. Federalism and Corporate Law: Reflections Upon Delaware. Yale Law Journal 83(4), 663-705.
Commission on European Communities. 1988. First Report on the State of Science and Technology in Europe. Luxemborg: Commission on European Communities.
Cutler, S.J. 1955. A Review of the Statistical Evidence on the Association Between Smoking and Lung Cancer. Journal of the American Statistical Association 50(270), 267-282.
Daniels P.L. 1997. National Technology Gaps and Trade: An Empirical Study of the Influence of Globalisation. Research Policy 25(8): 1189-1207.
Delios, A. & Henisz, W.J. 2000. Japanese Firms' Investment Strategies in Emerging Economies. Academy of Management Journal 43(3), 305-323.
Dosi, G., Pavitt, K., & Soete, L. 1990. The Economics of Technical Change and International Trade New York: New York University Press.
Drezner, D.. 2001. State Structure, Technological Leadership and the Maintenance of Hegemony. Review of International Studies 27(1), 3-25.
Dunlavy, C.A. 1994. Politics and Industrialization: Early Railroads in the US and Prussia. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Edquist, C. 1997. Systems of Innovation : Technologies, Institutions, and Organizations. Washington DC: Pinter Publishers.
Escobar-Lemmon, M. 2001. Fiscal Decentralization and Federalism in Latin America” Publius-The Journal of Federalism 31(4), 23-41.
European Commission. Third European Report on Science and Technology Indicators. 2003. Luxemborg: European Commission.
Florida, R. 2002. The Rise of the Creative Class: and How It’s Transforming Work, Leisure, Community and Everyday Life. New York, NY : Basic Books.
Furman J., Porter, M., & Stern, S. 2002. The Determinants of National Innovative Capacity. Research Policy 31(6), 899-933.
Gelb, Alan. 1988. Oil Windfalls: Blessing or Curse? New York: Oxford University Press.
Gerschenkron, A. 1962. Economic Backwardness in Historical Perspective. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Glanzel, W. & Moed, H.F. 2002. State-of-the-Art Report: Journal Impact Measures in Bibiliometric Research. Scientometrics 53(2), 171-193.
Green, W.H. 2000. Econometric Analysis 4th Edition (pp. 257-258). Upper Saddle River, N.J: Prentice Hall.
Griliches, Z. (Ed.). 1984. R&D, Patents, and Productivity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Grossman, G. & Helpman, E. 1991. Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Grossman, G. & Helpman, E. 1995. Technology and Trade. In Grossman G. & Rogoff, K. (Eds.). Handbook of International Economics, vol. III, New York: North Holland p. 1279-1337.
Hall, B.H., Jaffe, A., & Trajtenberg, M. 2000. Market Value and Patent Citations: A First Look. Working Paper, 7741. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Hall, B.H., Jaffe, A., & Trajtenberg, M. 2001. The NBER Patent Citations Data File: Lessons, Insights, and Methodological Tools. Working Paper 8498. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research;
Hall, P.A. 1986. Governing the Economy: The Politics of State Intervention in Britain and France. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.
Hall, P.A. & Soskice, D. 2001. Introduction. In Hall, P.A. & Soskice, D. (Eds.). Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage (pp 42-43). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Hart, J. 1992. Rival Capitalists: International Competitiveness in the United States, Japan, and Europe. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.
Hayek, F.A. 1945. The Use of Knowledge in Society. American Economic Review 35(4), 519-530.
Henisz, W.J. 2000. The Institutional Environment for Economic Growth" Economics & Politics 12(1), 1-31.
Henisz, W.J. 2002. The Institutional Environment for Infrastructure Investment. Industrial and Corporate Change 11(2), 355-389.
Henisz, W.J. & Zelner, B.A. 2001. The Institutional Environment for Telecommunications Investment. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy 10(1), 123-147.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. United Nations. 2001. Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Jaffe, A., Trajtenberg, M., & Fogarty, M. The Meaning of Patent Citations: Report of the NBER/Case Western Reserve Survey of Patentees. Working Paper, 7631. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Jennergren, L.P. 1981. Decentralization in Organizations. In Nystrom, P.C. & Starbuck, W.H. (Eds.). Handbook of Organizational Design Vol. II (pp. 39-59). New York: Oxford University Press.
Jones, C. 1998 Introduction to Economic Growth. New York: WW Norton & Company.
Keele L. & Kelly, N.J. 2006. Dynamic Models for Dynamic Theories: The Ins and Outs of Lagged Dependent Variables. Political Analysis 14(2), 186-205.
Kelly, N.J. 2002 The Nature and Degree of Bias in Lagged Dependent Variable Models. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Southern Political Science Association in Savannah, GA.
Klein L. 1962. An Introduction to Econometrics. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, 1962.,
Lanjouw, J.O. & Schankerman, M. 1999. The Quality of Ideas: Measuring Innovation with Multiple Indicators. Working Paper, 7345. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Lijphart, A. 1999. Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Lundvall, B.A. 1992. National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. London, UK: St. Martin's Press.
McMillan, G.S. & Hamilton, R.D. 2000. Using Bibliometrics to Measure Firm Knowledge: An Analysis of the US Pharmaceutical Industry. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 12 (4), 465-475.
McNeill, W.H. 1982. The Pursuit of Power: Technology, Armed Force, and Society Since A.D. 1000. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Mokyr, J. 1990. The Lever of Riches: Technological Creativity and Economic Progress. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Mokyr, J. 2002. The Gifts of Athena: Historical Origins of the Knowledge Economy. Princeton, NJ : Princeton University Press.
Marshall, M.G., Jaggers, K. & Gurr, T.R. 2003. Polity IV Project: Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800-2002. Integrated Network for Societal Conflict Research, University of Maryland: http://www.cidcm.umd.edu/inscr/polity/.
Nelson, R.R. 1993. National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Nelson, R.R. 2005. Technology, Institutions, and Economic Growth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Oates, W. 1972. Fiscal Federalism. New York, NY: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. 1986. Science and Technology Indicators (pp. 58-74). Paris: OECD.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. 2003 Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard 2003-Towards a Knowledge-Based Economy. Paris: OECD.
Pempel, T. J. 1998. Regime Shift: Comparative Dynamics of the Japanese Political Economy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Qian, Y. & Weingast, B.R. 1997. Federalism as a Commitment to Preserving Market Incentives Journal of Economic Perspectives 11(4): 83-92.
Rodden, J. 2002. The Dilemma of Fiscal Federalism: Grants and Fiscal Performance Around the World. American Journal of Political Science 44(3), 670-687.
Rodden, J. & Wibbels, E. 2002. Beyond the Fiction of Federalism: Macroeconomic Management in Multi-tiered Systems. World Politics 54(4), 494-531.
Rodden, J. 2005. Hamilton's Paradox: The Promise and Peril of Fiscal Federalism. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Rosenberg, N. & Birdzell, L.E. 1985. How the West Grew Rich: The Economic Transformation of the Industrial World. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Ross, M.L. 1999. The Political Economy of the Resource Curse. World Politics 51(2): 297-322;
Sachs, J.D. & Warner, A.M. 1995. Natural Resource Abundance and Economic Growth. Working Paper, 5398. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Samuels, R.J. 1987. The Business of the Japanese State: Energy Markets in Comparative and Historical Perspective. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Scherer, F.M. 1965. Firm Size, Market Structure, Opportunity, and the Output of Patented Innovations. American Economic Review 55(5): 1097-1125.
Schmookler, J. 1966. Invention and Economic Growth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Shilts, R. 1987. And the Band Played On: Politics, People, and the AIDS Epidemic. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Smith, M.R. (Ed.). 1985. Military Enterprise and Technological Change: Perspectives on the American Experience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Surowiecki, J. 2004. The Wisdom of Crowds: Why The Many Are Smarter Than The Few And How Collective Wisdom Shapes Business, Economies, Societies, and Nations. New York: Doubleday.
Taylor, M.Z. 2004. Empirical Evidence Against Varieties of Capitalism's Theory of Technological Innovation. International Organization 58 (3): 601-631.
Tiebout, Charles. 1956. A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures. Journal of Political Economy 64(5): 416-424.
Trajtenberg, M. 1990. A Penny for Your Quotes: Patent Citations and the Value of Innovations. The RAND Journal of Economics 21(1), 172-187.
Treisman, D. 2000a. The Causes of Corruption: A Cross-National Study. Journal of Public Economics 76(3), 399-457.
Treisman, D. 2000b. Decentralization and Inflation: Commitment, Collective Action, or Continuity? American Political Science Review 94(4), 837-857.
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. 2003. Investment and Technology Policies for Competitiveness: Review of Successful Country Experiences. New York : United Nations.
United Nations COMTRADE Database. New York : United Nations.
United States Arms Control and Disarmament Agency. 1975-1996. World Military Expenditures and Arms Transfers. Wash DC: USGPO.
Van Evera, S. 1997. Guide to Methods for Students of Political Science (pp. 30-32). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Watts, R.L. 1999. Comparing Federal Systems Kingston, ONT: McGill-Queens University. Press.
Weingast, B.R. 1995. The Economic Role of Political Institutions: Market-Preserving Federalism and Economic Development. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 11(1), 1-31.
Wibbels, E. 2000. Federalism and the Politics of Macroeconomic Policy and Performance American Journal of Political Science 44(4), 687-702.
Woodruff, D. 1999. Money Unmade: Barter and the Fate of Russian Capitalism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
World Bank. 2002 World Development Indicators. (CD-ROM) Washington DC: World Bank.
Yamashita, S. (Ed.) 1991. Transfer of Japanese Technology and Management to the ASEAN Countries. Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press.