Susanu, Monica (2008): Romanian Pattern in Absorption and Management of European Structural Funds : A Critical Analysis. Published in: The Annals of the Dunarea de Jos University. Economics and Applied Informatics , Vol. 1,
Download (95kB) | Preview
Abstract. The decisions in the cohesion policy have a significant impact upon the offer and supply, in a way that, under the influence of the multipliers, they constantly reconfigure the components of the internal consumption (such as investments, private consumption and imports), and the components of the final output and national income as well. Because of the short-term synergy effects of these actions, which determines the structure and the quality of the potential offer, the substantiation of these decisions ensure more importance and complexity concerning the responsibility of the macroeconomic management. The allotting of cohesion and structural funds is one of the significant directions of implementation of the budgetary policy of redistribution through the European Union budget. As essential instruments in making the expenses for structural adjustment and harmonization operations, these funds are meant to homogenize and consolidate an as high as possible social and economic standard in that particular beneficiary states. Since the greatest part of these funds is directed through the central national budgets, these have to be large enough and the governmental management – sufficiently well structured and responsible, so as to ensure both the necessary co-funding in applying the projects, and the implementation of the wish for prosperity of the fund benefiting community.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Romanian Pattern in Absorption and Management of European Structural Funds : A Critical Analysis|
|Keywords:||structural funds, cohesion policy, institutional responsibility, access, absorption|
|Subjects:||F - International Economics > F3 - International Finance
F - International Economics > F3 - International Finance > F33 - International Monetary Arrangements and Institutions
F - International Economics > F3 - International Finance > F36 - Financial Aspects of Economic Integration
|Date Deposited:||20. Nov 2008 01:21|
|Last Modified:||12. Feb 2013 11:05|
1. Banca Naţională a României – [http://www.bnr.ro];
2. Barker, D., CEEN Cosulting GmbH, „International Capacity Measurement Questionnaire”, Viena – 2005, available on :[http://ceen-consulting.com];
3. Bicanic, I., Franicevic, V., „The Challenges of Real and Subjective Poverty and the Growth of Inequalityin the Economies of Southeast Europe in Transition”, summary published in Financial Theory and Practice, 29(1),pp 13-16, 2005;
4. CEROPE, Survey „Impactul fondurilor structurale în România – evaluare cu ajutorul modelului HEROM”, available on :[http://www.cnp.ro/ro/modelare];
5. Comisia Naţională de Prognoză – [http://www.cnp.ro].
6. European Commission, Report on Budgetary and Financial Management- Yearbootk - 2003, available on : [http://europa.eu.int/comm/budget/infos/publications_en.htm]
7. Ministerul Economiei şi Finanţelor, [http://www.mefromania.ro] ;
8. Puigcerver-Penalver, M.-C., „The Impact of Structural Funds Policy on European Regions! Growth. A Theoretical and Empirical Approach”, article from The European Journal of Comparative Economics, Vol.4, nr.2(2007), pp 179-208, available on: [http://eaces.liuc.it]
9. Pylak, C., „Intelligent Region Management = Intelligent Absorption of EU funds”, article fom The Romanian Journal of Regional Science, vol.1, nr. 1, pp. 70-80, 2007;
10. Simovic,H., „The European Union Budget ”, review article from Financial Theory and Practice 29 (3), pp 245-262, 2005.