Bloch, Harry and Madden, Gary G and Savage, Scott J (2001): Economies of scale and scope in Australian telecommunications. Published in: Review of Industrial Organization , Vol. 18, (2001): pp. 219-227.
Download (50Kb) | Preview
This paper employs a composite cost function to examine the cost structure of Australian telephone services. The composite cost model combines the log-quadratic input price structure of the translog model with a quadratic structure for multiple outputs. Quadratic output structures permit the measurement of economies of scale, economies of scope, and subadditivity without prejudging their presence. Model estimates, on Telstra system data from 1926 to 1991, show that the production of Australian telephone services exhibits economies of scope but no ray economies of scale.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Economies of scale and scope in Australian telecommunications|
|Keywords:||Telecommunications; production; scale; scope; Australia|
|Subjects:||L - Industrial Organization > L9 - Industry Studies: Transportation and Utilities > L96 - Telecommunications|
|Depositing User:||Gary G Madden|
|Date Deposited:||19. Oct 2008 07:03|
|Last Modified:||12. Feb 2013 04:54|
Baumol, W. J. (1977) ‘On the Proper Cost Tests for Natural Monopoly in a Multiproduct Industry’, American Economic Review, 67, 809–822.
Baumol, W. J., and Y. M. Braunstein (1977) ‘Empirical Study of Scale Economies and Production Complementarity: The Case of Journal Publication’, Journal of Political Economy, 85, 1037–1048.
Baumol,W. J., J. C. Panzar, and R. D.Willig (1988) Contestable Markets and the Theory of Industrial Structure. San Diego: Hardcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Berg, S. V., and J. Tschirhart (1995) ‘A Market Test for Natural Monopoly in Local Exchange’, Journal of Regulatory Economics, 8, 103–124.
Bloch, H., G.Madden, and S. J. Savage (1998) Cost Structure and Natural Monopoly: Issues for Australian Telecommunications. Paper presented at the 1998 Conference of Economists, University of Sydney, 28-30 September, 1998.
Braunstein, Y. M., and L. P. Pulley (1998) ‘Economies of Scale and Scope in Telephony: Applying the Composite Cost Function to Bell System Data’, in Communication and Trade: Essays in Honor of Merhoo Jussawalla. New Jersey: Hampton Press.
Charnes, A., W. W. Cooper, and T. Sueyoshi (1988) ‘A Goal Programming/Constrained Regression Review of the Bell System Breakup’, Management Science, 34, 1–26.
Christensen, L. R., andW. H. Greene (1976) ‘Economies of Scale in U.S. Electric Power Generation’, Journal of Political Economy, 84, 655–676.
Denny, M., M. Fuss, and L. Waverman (1981) ‘The Measurement and Interpretation of Total Factor Productivity in Regulated Industries, with an Application to Canadian Telecommunications’, in T. G. Cowing and R. E. Stevenson, eds., Productivity Measurement in Regulated Industries. New York: Academic Press.
Diewert,W. E., and T. J.Wales (1987) ‘Flexible Functional Forms and Global Curvature Conditions’, Econometrica, 55, 43–68.
Diewert, W. E., and T. J. Wales (1991) Multiproduct Cost Function Estimation an Subadditivity Tests: A Critique of the Evans and Heckman Research on the U.S. Bell System. UBC Department of Economics Discussion Paper 91–21, pp. 1–19.
Evans, D. S., and Heckman, J.J. (1984) ‘A Test for Subadditivity of the Cost Function with an Application to the Bell System’, American Economic Review, 74, 615–623.
Pulley, L. B., and Y. M. Braunstein (1992) ‘A Composite Cost Function for Multiproduct Firms with an Application to Economies of Scope in Banking’, Review of Economics and Statistics, 74,221–230.
Röller, L. H. (1990a) ‘Modelling Cost Structure: The Bell System Revisited’, Applied Economics, 22, 1661–1674.
Röller, L. H. (1990b), ‘Proper Quadratic Cost Functions with an Application to the Bell System’, Review of Economics and Statistics 72, 202–210.
Serafica, R. B. (1998) ‘Was PLDT a Natural Monopoly?: An Economic Analysis of Pre-reform Philippine Telecoms’, Telecommunications Policy, 22, 359–370.
Shin, R. T., and J. S. Ying (1992) ‘Unnatural Monopolies in Local Telephone’, RAND Journal of Economics, 23, 171–183.