Halicioglu, Ferda (2008): An econometric study of CO2 emissions, energy consumption, income and foreign trade in Turkey.
Download (258kB) | Preview
This study attempts to examine empirically dynamic causal relationships between carbon emissions, energy consumption, income, and foreign trade in the case of Turkey using the time series data for the period 1960-2005. This research tests the interrelationship between the variables using the bounds testing to cointegration procedure. The bounds test results indicate that there exist two forms of long-run relationships between the variables. In the case of first form of long-relationship, carbon emissions are determined by energy consumption, income and foreign trade. In the case of second long-run relationship, income is determined by carbon emissions, energy consumption and foreign trade. An augmented form of Granger causality analysis is conducted amongst the variables. The long-run relationship of CO2 emissions, energy consumption, income and foreign trade equation is also checked for the parameter stability. The empirical results suggest that income is the most significant variable in explaining the carbon emissions in Turkey which is followed by energy consumption and foreign trade. Moreover, there exists a stable carbon emissions function. The results also provide important policy recommendations.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||An econometric study of CO2 emissions, energy consumption, income and foreign trade in Turkey|
|Keywords:||CO2 emissions; energy consumption; income; EKC hypothesis; foreign trade|
|Subjects:||O - Economic Development, Technological Change, and Growth > O4 - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity > O43 - Institutions and Growth
O - Economic Development, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O13 - Agriculture; Natural Resources; Energy; Environment; Other Primary Products
C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C2 - Single Equation Models; Single Variables > C22 - Time-Series Models; Dynamic Quantile Regressions; Dynamic Treatment Effect Models
|Depositing User:||Ferda HALICIOGLU|
|Date Deposited:||07. Nov 2008 23:05|
|Last Modified:||12. Feb 2013 12:07|
Ang, J., 2008. Economic development, pollutant emissions and energy consumption in Malaysia. Journal of Policy Modelling 30, 271-278.
Ang, J., 2007. CO2 emissions, energy consumption, and output in France. Energy Policy 35, 4772-4778.
Bahmani-Oskooee, M., Chomsisengphet, S., 2002. Stability of M2 demand functions in industrial countries. Applied Economics 34, 2075-2083.
Bahmani-Oskooee, M., Goswami, G. G., 2003. A disaggregated approach to test the J-curve phenomenon: Japan versus her major trading partners. Journal of Economics and Finance 27, 102-113.
Brown, R. L., Durbin, J., Evans, J. M., 1975. Techniques for testing the constancy of regression relations over time. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 37, 149-163.
CEC, 2007. Communication from the Commission to the European Council and the European Parliament: an Energy Policy for Europe. COM 2007, 1 Final, Brussels.
Coondoo, D., Dinda, S., 2008. The carbon dioxide emission and income: a temporal analysis of cross-country distributional patterns. Ecological Economics 65, 375-385.
Chow, G., 1960. Test of equality between sets of coefficients in two linear regressions. Econometrica 28, 591-605.
Dinda S., 2004. Environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: a survey. Ecological Economics 49, 431-455
Dinda, S., Coondoo, D., 2006. Income and emission: a panel data-based cointegration analysis. Ecological Economics 57, 167-181.
Engle, R., Granger, C., 1987. Cointegration and error correction representation: estimation and testing. Econometrica 55, 251-276.
Friedl, B., Getzner, M., 2003. Determinants of CO2 emissions in a small open economy. Ecological Economics 45, 133-148.
Grossman, G., Krueger, A., 1995. Economic environment and the economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics 110, 353-377.
Grossman, G., Krueger, A., 1991. Environmental impacts of a north American free trade agreement. National Bureau of Economics Research Working Paper, No.3194, NBER, Cambridge.
Gujarati, D. N., 2003. Basic Econometrics, 4th ed. McGraw Hill-Publishing, Boston.
Hansen, B. E., 1992. Tests for parameter instability in regressions with I(1) processes. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 10, 321-335.
Hansen, H., Johansen, S., 1993. Recursive Estimation in Cointegrated VAR Models. Institute of Mathematical Statistics, preprint No.1, January, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen.
Heil, M. T., Selden, T. M., 1999. Panel stationarity with structural breaks: carbon emissions and GDP. Applied Economic Letters 6, 223-225.
IMF, International Financial Statistics, various issues, Washington, D.C.
Johansen, S., 1988. Statistical analysis of cointegrating vectors. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 12, 231-254.
Johansen, S., Juselius, K., 1990. Maximum likelihood estimation and inference on cointegration–with application to the demand for money. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 52, 169-210.
Johansen, S., 1996. Likelihood-Based Inference in Cointegrated Vector Auto-Regressive Models, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Kraft, J., Kraft, A., 1978. On the relationship between energy and GNP. Journal of Energy Development 3, 401-403.
Kuznets, S., 1955. Economic growth and income inequality. American Economic Review 45, 1-28.
Lucas, R., Wheeler, D., Hettige, H., 1992. Economic development, environmental regulation, and international migration of toxic industrial pollution. In: Low, P. (Ed.)
International Trade and Environment. Discussion Papers, No. 159, World Bank, Washington, D.C.
Managi, S., Jena, P. R., 2008. Environmental productivity and Kuznets curve in India. Ecological Economics 65, 432-440.
Masih, A. M. M., Masih, R., 1996. Energy consumption, real income and temporal causality results from a multi-country study based on cointegration and error correction modeling techniques. Energy Economics 18, 165-183.
Mongelli, I., Tassielli, G., Notarnicola, B., 2006. Global warming agreements, international trade and energy/carbon embodiments: an input-output approach to the Italian case. Energy Policy 34, 88-100.
Narayan, P. K., Narayan, S., Prasad, A., 2008. A structural VAR analysis of electricity consumption and real GDP: evidence from the G7 countries. Energy Policy 36, 2765-2769.
Narayan, P. K., Singh, B., 2007. The electricity consumption and GDP nexus for the Fiji Islands. Energy Economics 29, 1141-1150.
Narayan, P. K., 2005. The Saving and investment nexus for China: evidence from cointegration tests. Applied Economics 37, 1979-1990.
Narayan, P. K., Smyth, R., 2006. Higher education, real income and real investments in China: evidence from Granger causality tests. Education Economics 14, 107-125.
Nohman, A., Antrobus, G., 2005. Trade and the environmental Kuznets curve: is southern Africa a pollution heaven? South African Journal of Economics 73, 803-814
Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., Smith, R. J., 2001. Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics 16, 289-326.
Phillips, P., Hansen, B., 1990. Statistical inference in instrumental variables regression with I(1) process. Review of Economic Studies 57, 99-125.
Soytas, U., Sari, R., in press. Energy consumption, economic growth, and energy emissions: challenges faced by an EU candidate member. Ecological economics, doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.06.014.
Soytas, U., Sari, R., Ewing, T., 2007. Energy consumption, income, and carbon emissions in the United States. Ecological Economics 62, 482-489.
Shafik, N., 1994. Economic development and environmental quality: an economic analysis. Oxford Economic Papers 46, 757-773.
Stern, D. I., 2004. The rise and fall of the environmental Kuznets curve. World Development 32, 1419-1439.
Suri, V., Chapman, D., 1998. Economic growth, trade and energy: implications for the environmental Kuznets curve. Ecological Economics 25, 195-208.
Telli, C., Voyvoda, E., Yeldan, E., 2008. Economics of environmental policy in Turkey: a general equilibrium investigation of the economic evaluation of sectoral emission reduction policies for climate change. Journal of Policy Modelling 30, 321-340.