Goldman, Dana and Leibowitz, Arleen and Robalino, David (2004): Employee Responses to Health Insurance Premium Increases. Published in: American Journal of Managed Care , Vol. 10, No. 10 (2004): pp. 41-47.
Download (106kB) | Preview
Objective: To determine the sensitivity of employees’ health insurance decisions—including the decision to not choose health maintenance organization or fee-for-service coverage—during periods of rapidly escalating healthcare costs.
Study Design: A retrospective cohort study of employee plan choices at a single large firm with a “cafeteria-style” benefits plan wherein employees paid all the additional cost of purchasing more generous insurance.
Methods: We modeled the probability that an employee would drop coverage or switch plans in response to employee premium increases using data from a single large US company with employees across 47 states during the 3-year period of 1989 through 1991, a time of large premium increases within and across plans.
Results: Premium increases induced substantial plan switching. Single employees were more likely to respond to premium increases by dropping coverage, whereas families tended to switch to another plan. Premium increases of 10% induced 7% of single employees to drop or severely cut back on coverage; 13% to switch to another plan; and 80% to remain in their existing plan. Similar figures for those with family coverage were 11%, 12%, and 77%, respectively. Simulation results that control for known covariates show similar increases. When faced with a dramatic increase in premiums—on the order of 20%—nearly one fifth of the single employees dropped coverage compared with 10% of those with family coverage.
Conclusions: Employee coverage decisions are sensitive to rapidly increasing premiums, and single employees may be likely to drop coverage. This finding suggests that sustained premium increases could induce substantial increases in the number of uninsured individuals.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Employee Responses to Health Insurance Premium Increases|
|Keywords:||health economics, health insurance, pay-roll tax, incentives, labor demand, labor supply|
|Subjects:||D - Microeconomics > D1 - Household Behavior and Family Economics > D12 - Consumer Economics: Empirical Analysis
I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I1 - Health > I12 - Health Production
|Depositing User:||David A. Robalino|
|Date Deposited:||09. Dec 2008 06:01|
|Last Modified:||14. Feb 2013 02:06|
1. The Kaiser Family Foundation and Health Research and Educational Trust. 2002 Employer health benefits survey. Available at: http://www.kff.org/content/2002/20020905a/. Accessed July 31, 2003.
2. Feldman R, Finch M, Dowd B, Cassou S. The demand for employment-based health insurance plans. J Hum Resour. 1989;24: 115-142.
3. McGuire TG. Price and membership in a prepaid group medical practice. Med Care. 1981;19:172-183.
4. Short PF, Taylor AK. Premiums, benefits, and employee choice of health insurance options. J Health Econ. 1989;8:293-311.
5. Welch WP. The elasticity of demand for health maintenance organizations. J Hum Resour. 1986;21:252-266.
6. Feldman R, Dowd B, Gifford G. The effect of HMOs on premiums in employment-based health plans. Health Serv Res. 1993; 27:779-811.
7. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Employee benefits in medium and large private establishments [news release]. Washington, DC: US Department of Labor; January 7, 1999. Available at: http://www.bls. gov/news.release/ebs3.toc.htm. Accessed October 6, 2003.
8. Buchmueller TC, Feldstein PJ. Consumer’s sensitivity to health plan premiums: evidence from a natural experiment in California. Health Aff (Millwood). 1996;15(1):143-151.
9. Cutler DM, Reber SJ. Paying for health insurance: the trade-off between competition and adverse selection. Q J Econ. 1998;113: 433-466.
10. Holmer M. Tax policy and the demand for health insurance. J Health Econ. 1984;3:203-221.
11. Marquis MS, Long SH. Worker demand for health insurance in the non-group market. J Health Econ. 1995;14:47-63.
12. Leibowitz AA, Chernew ME. The firms’ demand for health insurance. In: Health Benefits and the Workforce. Washington, DC: US Department of Labor, Pension, and Welfare Benefits Administration; 1992:77-83.
13. Long SH, Settle RF, Wrightson CW Jr. Employee premiums, availability of alternative plans, and HMO disenrollment. Med Care. 1988;26:927-938.
14. McFadden DL. Econometric models of probabilistic choice. In: Manski CF, McFadden DL, eds. Structural Analysis of Discrete Data with Econometric Applications. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press; 1981:198-272. Available at: http://emlab.berkeley.edu/users/ mcfadden/discrete.html. Accessed October 6, 2003.
15. Arthur WB, Lane DA. Information Constriction and Information Contagion. Santa Fe, NM: Santa Fe Institute; 1991. Working paper 91-05-026. Responses to Premium Increases VOL.