Ability of the New EU Member States to Fulfill the Exchange Rate Stability Convergence Criterion

Stavarek, Daniel (2006): Ability of the New EU Member States to Fulfill the Exchange Rate Stability Convergence Criterion. Unpublished.

Abstract

This paper assesses exchange rate development and volatility in six new EU member states (Cyprus, Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Slovakia, and Slovenia) during the period November 1996 - April 2006. The study is motivated by the unavoidable participation of the new member states’ currencies in the Exchange Rate Mechanism II and fulfillment of the exchange rate stability convergence criterion. The development of exchange rates is examined by the calculation of various rates of return and the exchange rate volatility is analyzed using moving average standard deviations of the annualized daily returns of the nominal bilateral exchange rates. The results suggest that the dilemma of “participation or non-participation in ERM II” have been solved properly so far by all countries analyzed. The three ERM II participating currencies (SIT, CYP, SKK) entered into the mechanism at the optimal time of stable exchange rate development and low volatility. On the other hand, the admissible fluctuation band ± 2.25 % seems to be still too narrow for the remaining three currencies (CZK, HUF, PLN), thus the currencies should remain out of ERM II for some time.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Institution: Silesian University - School of Business Administration
• Language: English
• Keywords: exchange rates; rate of return; volatility; ERM II; exchange rate stability criterion; new EU Member States
• Subjects: F - International Economics > F3 - International Finance > F31 - Foreign Exchange

References

BACKÉ, P. – THIMANN, C. (2004). The acceding countries’ strategies towards ERM II and the adoption of the euro: An analytical review. [ECB Occasional paper series No. 10]. Frankfurt am Main: European Central Bank, 2004. BAUER, C., HERZ, B. (2005). How Credible Are the Exchange Rate Regimes of the New EU Countries? Market Evidence from Market Sentiment. Eastern European Economics. 43, 2005, no. 3, pp. 55–77. CNB (2003). ERM II and the Exchange-rate Convergence Criterion. Information Material for the Czech Government. Praha: Czech National Bank, 2003. < http://www.cnb.cz/en/monetary_policy/strategic_documents/download/erm_ii_vlada_15_07_03_en.pdf > ČECH, Z. – HORVÁTH, R. – KOMÁREK, L. (2005). Kurzová konvergence a vstup do eurozóny III: Vybrané problémy nových členských zemí EU. Finance a úvěr – Czech Journal of Economics and Finance. 55, 2005, no. 9–10, pp. 483–505. DE VITA, G. – ABBOTT, A. (2004). The impact of exchange rate volatility on UK exports to EU countries. Scottish Journal of Political Economy. 51, 2004, no. 1, pp. 62–81. DELL ARICCIA, G. (1998). Exchange Rate Fluctuations and Trade Flows: Evidence from the European Union. [IMF Working Paper WP/98/107]. Washington D.C.: International Monetary Fund, 1998. < http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/wp98107.pdf > ECB (2004). Convergence report 2004. Frankfurt am Main: European Central Bank, 2004. NERLICH, C. (2002). Exchange rate strategies of EU accession countries: Does exchange rate policy matter? [Paper presented at the KOBE Research Seminar on “Regional, economic, financial and monetary cooperation: the European and Asian experience”, Frankfurt, 15–16 April 2002] Frankfurt am Main 2002. < www.mof.go.jp/jouhou/kokkin/tyousa/tyou046.pdf> STAVÁREK, D. (2004). ERM II: Potential Source of Instability in the New EU-member Countries. In Economic Policy Perspectives of Estonia in the European Union. Berlin: Berliner Wisseneschafts-Verlag, 2004, pp. 167–175. VERGIL, H. (2002). Exchange Rate Volatility in Turkey and Its Effects on Trade Flows. Journal of Economic and Social Research. 4, 2002, no. 1, pp. 83–99.