Bordering neighbours: Testing for border effect on Malaysia's northern states and Southern Thailand

Habibullah, M.S. and Dayang-Afizzah, A.M. (2008): Bordering neighbours: Testing for border effect on Malaysia's northern states and Southern Thailand.

Abstract

Economists agree that countries that are close together may experience common shocks that affect growth; that a country’s growth rate depends not only on domestic investment but also on the investment of its neighbouring countries. On the negative point, common shock such as wars and political instability can also have an adverse effect on growth of neighbouring countries. First, regional instability disrupts trade flows. Second, regional instability forces increases in military outlays, and will have a negative effect on economic performance. The purpose of the present study is to determine whether the growth rate of the neighbouring provinces of Southern Thailand has an effect on the economic growth of the Northern states of Malaysia. Using annual data from 1983 to 2003, our results using the long-run Granger causality in the vector error correction model setting suggest that Songkhla and Yala Granger cause Kedah; Songkhla Granger cause Perlis; and Narathiwat Granger cause Kelantan. On the other hand, while Perak and Yala indicate Granger cause in both direction, Perlis and Satun are independent of each other.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Granger causality; Malaysia; Thailand; economic growth
• Subjects: F - International Economics > F0 - General > F00 - General; F - International Economics > F2 - International Factor Movements and International Business > F20 - General

References

Ades, A. and Glaeser, E.L. (1994). Evidence on growth, increasing returns and the extent of the market. NBER Working Paper.

Banerjee, A., Dolado, J.J., Hendry, D.F., and Smith, G.W. (1986). Exploring equilibrium relationship in econometric through static models: Monte Carlo evidence. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 48, 253-277.

Barro, R. and Sala-i-Martin, X. (1997). Technological diffusion, convergence and growth. Journal of Economic Growth, 2, 1-17.

Boarnet, M. (1998). Spillovers and the location effects of public infrastructure. Journal of Regional Science, 38, 381-400.

Chua, H.B. (1993). Regional spillovers and economic growth. Center Discussion Paper No. 700, Economic Growth Center, Yale University.

Co, C.Y. and Wohar, M.E. (2004). Technological convergence among US regions and states. Economic Innovation and New Technology, 13(2), 101-126.

Dickey, D.A., and Fuller, W.A. (1981). Likelihood ratio statistics for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Econometrica, 49, 1057-1077.

Eaton, J. and Kortum, S. (1994). International patenting and technology diffusion. NBER Working Paper No. 4931.

Eaton, J. and Kortum, S. (1996). Trade in ideas: Patenting and productivity in the OECD. Journal of International Economics, 40, 251-278.

Goodfriend, M. and McDermott, J. (1998). Industrial development and the convergence question. American Economic Review, 88, 1277-1289.

Government of Malaysia. Malaysia Plans various issues.

Granger, C.W.J. (1988). Some recent developments in the concept of causality. Journal of Econometrics, 39, 199-211.

Haughwout, A. (1998). Aggregate production functions, interregional equilibrium and the measurement of infrastructure productivity. Journal of Urban Economics, 44, 216-227.

http://www.bps.go.id Kremers, J.J.M., Ericsson, N.R., and Dolado, J.J. (1992). The power of cointegration test. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 54, 325-348.

Lal, S.V. and Shalizi, Z. (2003). Location and growth in the Brazilian northeast. Journal of Regional Science, 43(4), 663-681.

MacKinnon. J.G. (1996). Numerical distribution functions for unit root and cointegration tests. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 11, 601-618.

Moreno, R. and Trehan, B. (1997). Location and the growth of nations. Journal of Economic Growth, 2, 399-418.

Pesavento, E. (2004). Analytical evaluation of the power of tests for the absence of cointegration”, Journal of Econometrics, 122, 349-384.

Silveira-Neto, R. and Azzoni, C.R. (2005). Location and regional income disparity dynamics: The Brazilian case. TD Nereus 01-2005. The University of Sao Paulo Regional and Urban Economics Lab. Sao Paulo.

Temple, J. (1999). The new growth evidence. Journal of Economic Literature, 37, 112-156.