Ortoleva, Pietro (2008): Status Quo Bias, Multiple Priors and Uncertainty Aversion.
Download (311Kb) | Preview
Motivated by the extensive evidence about the relevance of status quo bias both in experiments and in real markets, we study this phenomenon from a decision-theoretic prospective, focusing on the case of preferences under uncertainty. We develop an axiomatic framework that takes as a primitive the preferences of the agent for each possible status quo option, and provide a characterization according to which the agent prefers her status quo act if nothing better is feasible for a given set of possible priors. We then show that, in this framework, the very presence of a status quo induces the agent to be more uncertainty averse than she would be without a status quo option. Finally, we apply the model to a ﬁnancial choice problem and show that the presence of status quo bias as modeled here might induce the presence of a risk premium even with risk neutral agents.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Status Quo Bias, Multiple Priors and Uncertainty Aversion|
|Keywords:||Status quo bias, Ambiguity Aversion, Endowment Eﬀect, Risk Premium|
|Subjects:||D - Microeconomics > D1 - Household Behavior and Family Economics > D11 - Consumer Economics: Theory
D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D81 - Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty
|Depositing User:||Pietro Ortoleva|
|Date Deposited:||17. Dec 2008 18:59|
|Last Modified:||12. Feb 2013 04:15|
Ameriks, J. and S. P. Zeldes (2004): “How Do Household Portfolio Shares Vary with Age?” Discussion Paper, Columbia University.
Anscombe, F. J. and R. J. Aumann (1963): “A Deﬁnition of Sub jective Probability,” The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 34, 199–205.
Barillas, F., L. Hansen, and T. J. Sargent (2007): “Doubts or Variability?” Mimeo, New York University.
Bewley, T. F. (1986): “Knightian Decision Theory: Part I,” Cowles Foundation discussion paper, 807.
Chen, Z. and L. Epstein (2002): “Ambiguity, Risk and Asset Returns in continuous time,” Econometrica, 70, 1403–1443.
Debreu, G. (1964): “Contuinity Properties of Paretian Utility,” International Eco- nomic Review, 5, 285–293.
Dow, J. and S. R. da Costa Werlang (1992): “Uncertainty Aversion, Risk Aver- sion, and the Optimal Choice of Portfolio,” Econometrica, 60, 197–204.
Epstein, L. G. and T. Wang (1994): “Intertemporal Asset Pricing under Knightian Uncertainty,” Econometrica, 62, 283–322.
Ghirardato, P., F. Maccheroni, and M. Marinacci (2004): “Diﬀerentiating ambiguity and ambiguity attitude,” Journal of Economic Theory, 118, 133–173.
Ghirardato, P. and M. Marinacci (2002): “Ambiguity Made Precise: A Compar- ative Foundation,” Journal of Economic Theory, 102, 251–289.
Gilboa, I. and D. Schmeidler (1989): “Maxmin expected utility with a non-unique prior,” Journal of Mathematical Economics, 18, 141–153.
Hansen, L. P. and T. J. Sargent (2000): “Wanting robustness in macroeconomics,” Mimeo, New York University.
Hansen, L. P. and T. J. Sargent (2001): “Robust control and model uncertainty,” American Economic Review, 91, 60–66.
Hartman, R., M. Doane, and C.-K. Woo (1991): “Consumer Rationality and the Status Quo’,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106, 141–162.
Kahneman, D., J. Knetsch, and R. Thaler (1991): “Anomalies: The Endowment Eﬀect, Loss Aversion, and Status Quo Bias,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5, 193–206.
Maccheroni, F., M. Marinacci, and A. Rustichini (2006): “Ambiguity Aversion, Robustness, and the Variational Representation of Preferences,” Econometrica, 74, 1447–1498.
Madrian, B. C. and D. F. Shea (2001): “The Power of Suggestion: Inertia in 401(k) Participation and Savings Behavior,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107, 1149–1187.
Masatlioglu, Y. and E. A. Ok (2005): “Rational Choice with status quo bias,” Journal of Economic Theory, 121, 1–29.
Masatlioglu, Y. and E. A. Ok (2008): “A Canonical Choice Model with Initial Endowment,” Mimeo, New York University.
Ok, E. A., P. Ortoleva, and G. Riella (2007): “Rational Choice with Endoge- neously Determined Reference Points,” Mimeo, New York University.
Roca, M., R. M. Hogarth, and A. J. Maule (2006): “Ambiguity seeking as a result of the status quo bias,” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 32, 175–194.
Sagi, J. (2003): “Anchored Preference Relations,” University of California.
Sagi, J. (2006): “Anchored Preference Relations,” Journal of Economic Theory, 130, 283–295.
Samuelson, W. and R. Zeckhauser (1988): “Status quo bias in decision making,” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1, 7–59.
Strzalecki, T. (2007): “Axiomatic Foundations of Multiplier Preferences,” North- western University.
Sugden, R. (2003): “Reference-dependent sub jective expected utility,” Journal of Eco- nomic Theory, 111, 172–191.
Tversky, A. and D. Kahneman (1991): “Loss Aversion in Riskless Choice: A Reference-Dependent Model,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106, 1039–1061.
Tversky, A. and D. Kahneman (1992): “Advances in prospect theory: cumulative representation of uncertainty,” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5, 297–323.