Bos, Frits (2006): The national accounts as a tool for analysis and policy; past, present and future.
Download (1MB) | Preview
An overview is provided of the history, logic, merits and limitations of the national accounts.
Past In the second half of the seventeenth century the first estimates of national income were made. These estimates served clear purposes, like demonstrating that a revision of the English tax system could raise sufficient resources for waging a war with Holland or France. The number of estimates and their frequency gradually increased, in particular since the First World War. Major innovations, like the development of the sector accounts, input-output tables and the arrival of the first guidelines took place in the thirties and forties. These innovations were stimulated by the Keynesian revolution and the development of macro-econometric model building. Since the Second World War national accounts statistics have become institutionalised and standardised, i.e. they are regularly compiled by national statistical institutes, Central Banks or Ministries and are based on one universal set of multi-purpose concepts and classifications. About a decade ago, the third generation of international guidelines on national accounting was introduced. In comparison to the first guidelines, the scope was drastically extended, e.g. by the inclusion of prices and volumes, balance sheets and input-output tables. However, the basic concepts, like the production boundary have hardly been changed in fifty years. Since the collapse of communism, no separate guidelines and concepts exist for the (formerly) communist countries. The European Unification has stimulated a revolution in national accounting, in particular with respect to the development of jurisprudence and the improvement and harmonization of the estimates. The European Union was not only aware of the possibilities of the national accounts as a tool for European policy, but acted also as a critical consumer. The latter was vital for generating this revolution in European national accounts practice.
Present National accounts statistics are a miracle come true: all over the world, very incomplete, imperfect, heterogeneous and partly outdated data are transformed into a complete, consistent, internationally standardised and up-to-date overview of the national economy and its major components. What is the magic behind this miracle?
The universal model National accounts statistics are estimates of a universal accounting model for describing, analysing and managing national economies. This universal model is not a neutral description of economic reality: it is focused on what can be readily observed in monetary terms, it contains substantial transformations of what can be observed and is based on a specific way of labelling economic reality. Different choices would have resulted in a different picture of economic reality. The major biases of the universal model merely reflect the natural focus of a regular economic statistic, i.e. a focus on what can be readily observed in monetary terms. This explains why the economic importance of unpaid household services, leisure time, pollution and tax expenditures is ignored. Including such major analytic elements in the basic concepts would seriously endanger the statistical purpose of the universal model. Furthermore, it would also drastically decrease the relevance of the universal model and its major aggregates for important other data needs, e.g. those of budgetary and monetary policy. The substantial transformations of what can be readily observed are required in order to look –on behalf of analysis and policy- through the complex, chaotic and many different economic and institutional realities. The specific concepts used are the result of many implicit and explicit considerations with respect to relevance, reliability and comparability. They are also influenced by the need to agree on one set of concepts, even if arguments are not sufficient to settle the score. The universal model incorporates two types of perspectives on the national economy. Firstly, it describes the national economy in terms of its major components (sectors/industries, various types of flows and stocks and several economic processes). This is the general perspective of the universal model. However, the universal model describes also each major component in a macro-economic context and in relation to the other major components. These are the specific perspectives incorporated in the universal model. Seven major specific perspectives can be distinguished: 1. Non-financial corporations (business accounts); 2. Financial corporations (monetary policy, financial markets); 3. Government (budgetary policy, government finance); 4. Households (personal income, wealth and consumption); 5. Rest of the world (balance of payments); 6. Industries (production, employment and input-output analysis); 7. Other (e.g. the environment, human capital and the welfare state). The old and most recent history of the national accounts demonstrates that these specific perspectives, and in particular that of the government and its relations to the national economy, are a major motivation for compiling national accounts statistics. The universal model is an ingenious and very practical product. The various perspectives demonstrate that it is a synthesis of various types of applied economic analysis, e.g. business accounts, Keynesian type of analysis, input-output analysis and index number theory. The universal model also reflects three hundred years of experience in compiling national accounts statistics. Nevertheless, the universal model can still be improved in various ways. The universal model stresses the importance of flexibility, but does not make an explicit link to the seven perspectives. For each of these perspectives, standard supplementary concepts, like government expenditure and revenue, entrepreneurial income after tax and net worth to the owner, are very relevant and can be easily derived from the basic concepts of the universal model. For each of these perspectives also the importance of prices, volumes, real values and key-ratios should be stressed. Also some changes in the basic concepts are proposed e.g.: - Other non-market output, e.g. of the government, should be valued including a net operating surplus by amount of an opportunity interest on the capital invested. - The purchase of consumer durables by households should be recorded as capital formation instead of as final consumption expenditure. Imputed services of owner-used consumer durables should be recorded by amount of its consumption of fixed capital plus an opportunity interest on the capital invested. These imputed services are consumed as part of the final consumption expenditure of households. These changes increase the relevance of the national accounts from an economic theoretic point of view. Furthermore, also various changes in the presentation of national accounts statistics are proposed, e.g. a more systematic distinction between actual and imputed flows and the limitation of the number of accounts.
The national measurement process The universal model can not be estimated directly. It should first be translated into an operational model for a specific country during a specific period of time. This involves interpretation of the universal model in view of the national economy and further specification of the concepts, detail and scope. For example, which units belong to the sector government en to what extent can price- and volume measures take account of changes in quality? The operational model decides to a substantial extent what is actually measured. Differences in national operational models are therefore a serious threat to international comparability. The operational model is estimated by combining very heterogeneous and incomplete sets of data; the latter include national accounts estimates for previous periods and frames of reference for grossing up and combining data, e.g. a business register or a population census. The major estimation tools are accounting identities, plausibility checks and assumptions. The estimation process is influenced by environmental factors like skills (e.g. skills in combining data and making plausible assumptions), resources (e.g. resources for compiling good price-statistics, for maintaining a reliable business register or for compiling national accounts statistics) and policy (e.g. a mixed strategy of continuity or a preference for prudence and stability).
Uses of the national accounts National accounts statistics are important for economic policy and analysis. Four different roles are played by national accounts statistics: 1. description and object of analysis; 2. tool for analysis and forecasting; 3. tool for communication and decision-making; 4. input for alternative accounts, budgetary rules and estimates. As a description and object of analysis, national accounts statistics are unique. They define and measure the national economy and its major components. They make the sizes and developments in national economies all over the world visible and put them into quantitative terms. As a consequence, the world economy, the national economies and their major components can be monitored and analysed. Not all descriptions are suited as an object of analysis. National accounts statistics are partly built on assumptions. Assumptions are essential in combining and completing the basic set of data. Plausible assumptions are even to be preferred above unreliable data. The more encompassing, up-to-date, detailed and reliable the basic data set, the smaller the role played by assumptions can be. By changing the definitions of the universal model, the role of assumptions can be increased or decreased. This also changes the usefulness of national accounts statistics as an object of analysis. For a proper analysis of national accounts statistics, sufficient information should be available about the operational concepts underlying the national accounts statistics, their reliability and the role of major specific events and institutional circumstances. Furthermore, users should have sufficient knowledge of the logic, merits and limitations of national accounts statistics in general. As a tool for analysis and forecasting, national accounts statistics are built on three very useful stocks of knowledge: the universal model, the operational model and the national compilation skills. Ignoring the national accounts as tool for analysis and forecasting can result in serious conceptual and statistical pitfalls. However, as a tool for analysis and forecasting, the national accounts have also clear limitations. For a proper use, national accounts statistics should often be rearranged or be supplemented with alternative concepts, alternative data and equations describing economic behaviour. As a tool for communication and decision-making, national accounts statistics are unique. They serve as the universal facts and language for thinking and communicating about national economies and their major components. They provide new opportunities for decision-making by providing information about major macro-economic developments, by providing explicit targets for many types of policy and by providing price-indexes for inflating contracts and agreements in real terms. However, for a proper and optimal use, knowledge of the merits and limitations of national accounts statistics is essential. National accounts statistics serve also as an input for alternative estimates, accounts for non-national accounting purposes and policy targets. As an input for alternative estimates, official national accounts statistics serve as a very cheap, well-designed, universal semi-manufactured product. These alternative estimates may reflect fundamentally different perspectives on the national economy, e.g. welfare-measures. However, some of the major alternative estimates are best labelled as non-official national accounts statistics, e.g. by providing much longer time series. National accounts can also serve as a benchmark or source of inspiration for accounts for non-national accounting purposes (e.g. for the bookkeeping systems of municipalities) and policy targets (e.g. in defining the budgetary ceilings for state expenditure in the Netherlands). In this way, the national accounts actually extends its scope as a tool for communication and decision-making.
The future On the brink of the twenty-first century the world is undergoing dramatic changes. Four trends (globalisation, regionalisation, automation and more-market oriented government) are changing the data needs and possibilities of the national accounts. Globalisation and regionalisation will increase the political use of national accounts figures. This reinforces requirements on international comparability and standardisation as evidenced by the European experience. Globalisation and more-market oriented government will pose serious difficulties for the quality and completeness of the statistics and administrative data sources used for compiling national accounts figures. A pro-active response is essential for statisticians. The possibilities for national accountants may be increased due to automation, putting minimum standards on the inputs for the national accounts statistics to increase their international comparability and advances in national accounts compilation techniques. More-market oriented government can stimulate the development of more efficient, effective and attractive national accounts statistics that appeal to a wide range of data users. However, it can also result in cutting down the resources for national accounts statistics and its major inputs below a minimum-level. National accounts statistics will then be trapped: resources are not enough to meet a minimum standard of reliability, to make national accounts statistics more attractive and to find new users; the potentials of the national accounts statistics are then trapped. In order to meet these challenges and dangers of the future, the efficiency and the national accounts as a product should be improved. This can be done in various ways, e.g. by: - Developing an international long term strategy for improving national accounts compilation techniques; - A better balance between the compilation process and the outputs; - More modules for specific purposes. Some of these could contain internationally standardized supplementary concepts, like entrepreneurial income after tax, government expenditure and revenue or household income in cash. They may also contain modelling results, as modelling is often essential for a balanced view on the national economy. - An international, EU-like, program for increasing the reliability and comparability of major national accounts variables, e.g. Domestic Product and the volume growth of Domestic Product. - Investigation of user practice and the lessons that can be learned from that. - Supplementing national accounts statistics with information about their meaning and reliability, e.g. about the operational concepts, the data sources, compilation methods, the size of the differences between successive estimates and the results of various types of sensitivity analyses. In order to clarify the value-added of national accounting and to fight wide-spread illiteracy in national accounting, marketing and education should be taken up seriously, preferably by an international long term strategy and by making use of all the possibilities of internet.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Institution:||CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis|
|Original Title:||The national accounts as a tool for analysis and policy; past, present and future|
|Keywords:||history of the national accounts; political arithmetic; measurement in economics; balance of payments; business accounts; public finance; input-output analysis; national accounts and economic theory; compilation of the national accounts; reliability of national accounts statistics; national accounts and welfare|
|Subjects:||B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B4 - Economic Methodology
C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C8 - Data Collection and Data Estimation Methodology; Computer Programs > C82 - Methodology for Collecting, Estimating, and Organizing Macroeconomic Data
|Depositing User:||Frits Bos|
|Date Deposited:||22. Dec 2006|
|Last Modified:||12. Feb 2013 12:45|
Adema, W., 1997, What Do Countries Really Spend on Social Policies? A Comparative Note. (OECD Economic Studies no. 28).
Al, P.G., B.M. Balk, S. de Boer and G.P. den Bakker, 1985, The Use of Chain Indices for Deflating the National Accounts, National Accounts Occasional Papers, nr. 5 (Statistics Netherlands, Voorburg).
Alsonso, W. and P. Starr (eds.), 1987, The Politics of Numbers (Russell Sage Foundation, New York).
Arvay, J., 1994, The Material Product System (MPS); a Retrospective. Paper in Kenessey (1994), pp. 218-236.
Aukrust, O., 1986, On the Occasion of a Nobel prize. Review of Income and Wealth, nr. 1, pp. 109-112.
Aukrust, O., 1994, The Scandinavian Contribution to National accounting. In Kenessey (1994), pp. 16-65.
Bakker, G.P. den, 1991, The Choice of Index Number Formulae and Weights in the National Accounts. A Sensitivity Analysis Based on Macro-Economic Data for the Interwar Period, National Accounts Occasional Papers nr. 44 (Statistics Netherlands, Voorburg).
Bakker, G.P. den, 1994, Origin and Development of Dutch National Accounts. Paper in Kenessey (1994), pp. 66-92.
Bakker, G.P. den, T.A. Huitker and C.A. van Bochove, 1990, The Dutch Economy 1921-39; Revised Macroeconomic Data for the Interwar Period. Review of Income and Wealth, Series 36, No. 2, pp. 187-206.
Baumol, W.J., 2000, Leontief’s Great Leap Forward: Beyond Quesnay, Marx and von Bortkiewicz. Economic Systems Research, Volume 12, Number 2, pp. 141-152.
Begg, I, J. Bournay, M. Weale and S. Wright, 1996, Financial Intermediation Services Indirectly Measured: Estimates for France and the UK Based on the Approach Adopted in the 1993 SNA. Review of Income and Wealth, Series 42, Number 4, pp. 453-473.
Bergeijk, P.A.G. van, 1995, The Accuracy of International Economic Observations. Bulletin of Economic Research, vol. 47, nr. 1, pp. 1-20.
Bodkin, R.G., L.R. Klein and K. Marwah, 1991, A History of Macroeconometric Model-Building (Edward Elgar, Aldershot).
Bjerve, P.J. and M. Selsjord, 1959, Financial Accounting within a System of National Accounting. Income and Wealth Series VIII (International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, Bowes & Bowes Publishers Ltd, London), pp. 60-79.
Bjerkholt, O., 1998, Interaction between Model Builders and Policy Makers in the Norwegian Tradition. Economic Modelling 15, pp. 317-339.
Bochove, C.A. van and H.K. van Tuinen, 1986, Flexibility in the Next SNA: the Case for an Institutional Core. Review of Income and Wealth, pp. 127-154.
Boer, S. de, J. van Dalen and P. Verbiest, 1997, Chain Indices in the National Accounts; the Dutch Experience, National Accounts Occasional Papers nr 87 (Statistics Netherlands, Voorburg).
Boogaard, A. van den, 1998, Configuring the Economy; The Emergence of a Modelling Practice in the Netherlands, 1920-1955 (Thela Thesis).
Bos, F., 1989a, Valuation of Merchandise Imports and Exports and the Registration of Trade in Services, CBS-Select 5, Statistical Essays (SDU-publishers, Den Haag), pp. 63-75, 1989.
Bos, F., 1989b, A Systems View on Concepts of Income in the National Accounts. National Accounts Occasional Paper nr. 33 (Statistics Netherlands, Voorburg).
Bos, F., 1990, Net Versus Gross National Income, National Accounts Occasional Papers nr 38 (Statistics Netherlands, Voorburg).
Bos, F., 1991, Begrotingsnormering en de Nationale rekeningen (“Norms for the Government Budget and the National Accounts”). Economisch Statistische Berichten, vol. 76, nr. 3801, p. 333, 1991.
Bos, F., 1992a, The History of National Accounting. National Accounts Occasional Paper nr. 48 (Statistics Netherlands, Voorburg).
Bos, F., 1992b, Reasons for Preferring Net to Gross figures of Income and Product (and Vice Versa). Review of Income and Wealth, Series 38, nr. 3, pp. 267-280.
Bos, F., 1992c, Deregulation and Economic Statistics: Europe 1992. National Accounts Occasional Paper nr. 47 (Statistics Netherlands, Voorburg).
Bos, F., 1993, Standard National Accounting Concepts, Economic Theory and Data Compilation Issues; On Constancy and Change in the United Nations-Manuals on National Accounting (1947, 1953, 1968, 1993). National Accounts Occasional Paper, nr. 61 (Statistics Netherlands, Voorburg).
Bos, F., 1994a, Constancy and Change in the United Nations Manuals on National Accounting (1947, 1953, 1968, 1993). In Kenessey (1994), pp. 198-217.
Bos, F., 1994b, Implementing the Revised SNA in the Dutch National Accounts. Netherlands Official Statistics, vol. 9, Spring, pp. 12-25.
Bos, F., 1994c, The National Accounts as a Good but not Perfect Instrument for International Comparison. Paper presented at the 23th Conference of the IARIW, St. Andrews, New Brunswick, Canada.
Bos, F., 1995, National Accounting and Economic Theory. National Accounts Occasional Paper nr. 75 (Statistics Netherlands, Voorburg).
Bos, F. 1996a, Chapter III Transactions in Products. In European System of Accounts (ESA95) (Eurostat, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg).
Bos, F. 1996b, Chapter IX The Input-Output Framework. In European System of Accounts (ESA95) (Eurostat, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg).
Bos, F., 1996c, The Future of the National Accounts, National Accounts Occasional Paper nr. 81 (Statistics Netherlands, Voorburg).
Bos, F., 1996d, Human Capital and Economic Growth: A National Accounting Approach. Paper Presented at the 24th IARIW Conference, Lillehammer, Norway.
Bos, F., 1996e, Les Conséquences de la Disparition des Données Douanières. In E. Archambault and O. Arkhipoff (eds.), Mésure et Valeur en Comptabilité Nationale (Economica, Paris), pp. 21-38.
Bos, F., 1997, Value and Income in the National Accounts and Economic Theory. Review of Income and Wealth, June 1997, pp. 173-190.
Bos, F., 2000, A Simple Module Linking Social Protection Statistics and the National Accounts. Netherlands Official Statistics, Spring 2000, pp. 30-36.
Bos, F. and C.N. Gorter (eds.), 1993, Compiling Dutch Gross National Product (GNP); Full Report on the Final Estimates After the Revision in 1992. National Accounts Occasional Paper nr. 57-extended (Statistics Netherlands, Voorburg).
Bos, F., H. Hollanders and S.J. Keuning, 1992, A Research and Development Module Supplementing the National Accounts, National Accounts Occasional Paper nr. 51 (Statistics Netherlands, Voorburg).
Bos, F., H. Hollanders and S.J. Keuning, 1994, A Research and Development Module Supplementing the National Accounts. Review of Income and Wealth, Series 40, nr. 3, September, pp. 273-286.
Bos, F., C. Ravets and H. Hansen, 1996a, Chapter I. General Features. In European System of Accounts (ESA95) (Eurostat, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg).
Boumans, M., 2001, Measure for Measure: How Economists Model the World into Numbers. Social Research, Vol. 68, No. 2, pp. 427-453.
Buiten, G., J. van den Hof and P. van de Ven, 1999, Revision of the Dutch National Accounts; First Results and Backgrounds, National Accounts Occasional Paper nr. 91 (Statistics Netherlands, Voorburg).
Butter, F.A.G. den and M.S. Morgan, 1998, What Makes the Models-Policy Interaction Successful? Economic Modelling 15, pp. 443-475.
Carson, C.S., 1975, The History of the United States National Income and Product Accounts: the Development of an Analytical Tool. Review of Income and Wealth, pp. 153-181.
Carson, C.S., 1999, 50-Year Retrospective of the IARIW: The Early Years. Review of Income and Wealth, Series 45, Number 3, pp. 379-396.
CBS (Statistics Netherlands), 1939, Enkele berekeningen over het Nationale Inkomen van Nederland. Speciale Onderzoekingen van de Nederlandsche Conjunctuur, no. 2. (Statistics Netherlands, Den Haag).
CBS, 1948, Het Nationale Inkomen van Nederland 1921-1939. No. 7 der Monografieën van de Nederlandsche conjunctuur (Uitgeversmaatschappij W. de Haan n.v., Utrecht).
CBS, 1950, De Nationale Jaarrekeningen: Doeleinden, Problemen, Resultaten. No. 8 der Monografieën van de Nederlandsche Conjunctuur (Uitgeversmaatschappij W. de Haan n.v., Utrecht).
Clark, C., 1932, The National Income, 1924-1931 (MacMillan and Co., Ltd, London).
Clark, C., 1937, National Income and Outlay (MacMillan and Co., Ltd, London).
Clark, C., 1940, Conditions of Economic Progress (MacMillan and Co., Ltd, London).
Cleeff, E. van, 1941a, Nationale Boekhouding: Proeve van een Jaaroverzicht Nederland 1938. De Economist, pp. 415-424.
Cleeff, E. van, 1941b, Beteekenis en Inrichting eener Nationale Boekhouding. De Economist, pp. 608-623.
Colecchia, A. and P. Schreyer, 2002, The Contribution of Information and Communication Technologies to Economic Growth in Nine OECD Countries. OECD Economic Studies nr 34, pp. 153-171.
Collins, H.M., 1985, Changing Order; Replication and Induction in Scientific Practice (SAGE Publications London).
Copeland, M.A., 1952, A Study of Moneyflows in the United States. (National Bureau of Economic Research, New York).
DeMichelis, A., 1993, The European Community and its Statistical System. Journal of Official Statistics, Statistics Sweden, pp. 137-167.
Deming, W.E., 1943, Statistical Adjustment of Data. (Wiley, New York).
Demotes-Mainard, M. and J. Bournay, 1994, Revisions of the French National Accounts; Past Experience as Lessons for the Future. Paper presented at the 23th IARIW Conference.
Denison, E.F., 1947, Report on Tripartite Discussions of National Income Measurement. Studies in Income and Wealth, vol. X, pp. 3-22. (National Bureau of Economic Research, New York).
Denison, E.F., 1991, U.S. National Income and Product Estimates: Evaluation and Some Specific Suggestions for Improvement. Survey of Current Business, 50th Anniversary Issue, pp. 36-44.
Derksen, J.B.D., 1944, Nationale Boekhouding, Doeleinden, Problemen en Resultaten ["National Bookkeeping, Purposes, Problems and Results"]. In: CBS, 1978, Denken en Meten; Statistische Opstellen (Staatsuitgeverij, Den Haag), pp. XIX-XXVII.
Derksen, J.B.D., 1946, A System of National Book-keeping; Illustrated by the Experience of the Netherlands Economy. National Institute of Economic and Social Research Occasional Paper X (Cambridge University Press, London).
Desrosières, A., 1998, The Politics of Large Numbers; A History of Statistical Reasoning (Harvard University Press, Cambridge Massachusetts).
Diewert, E.W. and K.J. Fox, 1999, Can Measurement Error Explain the Productivity Paradox? Canadian Journal of Economics, Volume 32 (2), Special Issue on Service Sector Productivity and the Productivity Paradox, pp. 251-280.
Don, F.J.H., 2001, Forecasting in Macroeconomics: a Practitioner’s View. De Economist, pp. 155-175.
Eckstein, O., 1971, A Model-Builder’s View of the National Income Accounts. Survey of Current Business, 50th Anniversary Issue, pp. 65-66.
Economic Classification Policy Committee, 1993/1994, Issues Papers 1-8 (US Department of Commerce, Washington).
Eije, J.H. von, 1982, Geldstromen en Inkomensverdeling in de Verzorgingsstaat, WRR, V32, Den Haag.
Eijk, C.J., 1993, National Accounts and the Macroeconomic Revolutions of the Interwar Period. In: Vries et al. (1993), pp. 133-150.
Eisner, R., 1988, Extended Accounts for National Income and Product. Journal of Economic Literature. Vol. XXVI, pp. 1611-1684.
Eisner, R., 1989, Divergences of Measurement and Theory and Some Implications for Economic Policy. American Economic Review, pp. 1-13.
Eisner, R., 1992, Deficits: Which, How Much and So What? American Economic Review, vol 72, pp. 295-298.
Eisner, R., 1994, The Misunderstood Economy: What Counts and How To Count It (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, Massachusetts).
Eltis, W., 1984, The Classical Theory of Economic Growth (MacMillan).
Eurostat, 1970, European System of Integrated Economic Accounts (ESA) (Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg).
Eurostat, 1976, European System of Social Protection Statistics (ESSPROS) (Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg)
Eurostat, 1995, European System of Accounts (ESA95) (Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg).
Eurostat, 2001, Handbook on Price and Volume Measures in National Accounts (Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg).
Franz, A., 1996, A Class Society of National Accounts Compilers? Considerations on Certain Requirements and Some Consequences of the Transition to the New Systems. Paper Presented at the Joint UN-ECE/Eurostat/OECD Meeting on National Accounts, Geneva, 30 April-3 May 1996.
Frisch, R., 1955, From National Accounts to Macro-Economic Decision Models, IARIW Papers on Income and Wealth Series IV (Bowes&Bowes, London).
Fuess, S.M. and H. van den Berg, 1996, Does GNP Exaggerate Growth in “Actual” Output? The Case of the United States. Review of Income and Wealth, Series 42, Number 1, pp. 35-48.
Geelhoed, L.A. and J. van Sinderen, 1993, National Accounts, Economic-Policy Standards and Economic Policy: some Observations. In: Vries et al (1993), pp. 167-192.
Gilbert, M., 1944, National Product, War and Prewar: Some Comments on Professor Kuznets' Study and a Reply by Professor Kuznets. The Review of Economic Statistics, Volume XXVI, Number 3, pp. 109-135.
Gilbert, M, G. Jaszi, E.F. Denison and C.F. Schwartz, 1948, Objectives of National Income Measurement: A Reply to professor Kuznets. Review of Economics and Statistics, pp. 179-195.
Gilbert, M. and I.B. Kravis, 1954, An International Comparison of National products and the Purchasing Power of Currencies; A study of the United States, the United Kingdom, France, Germany and Italy. (OEEC, Paris).
Gilchrist, D.A. and L.V. St. Louis, 1999, Completing Input-Output Tables using Partial Information, with an Application to Canadian Data. Economic Systems Research, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 185-194.
Goldschmidt-Clermont, L. and E. Pagnossin-Aligisakis, 1999, Household’s Non-SNA Production: Labour Time, Value of Labour and of Product, and Contribution to Extended Private Consumption. Review of Income and Wealth, Series 45, Number 4, pp. 519-530.
Goldsmith, R.W., 1951, A Perpetual Inventory of National Wealth. Studies in Income and Wealth (NBER, New York), Vol. 14, pp. 5-74.
Goldsmith, R.W., 1962, The National Wealth of the United States in the Postwar Period. (Princeton University Press, Princeton).
Goldsmith, R.W., 1985, Comparative National Balance Sheets; A Study of Twenty Countries, 1688-1978. (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).
Gorter, C.N., 1988, Imputations and Re-routeings in the National Accounts. National Accounts Occasional Paper nr. 26 (Statistics Netherlands, Voorburg).
Gorter, C.N. and P. van der Laan, 1992, An Economic Core System and the Socio-Economic Accounts Module for the Netherlands. Review of Income and Wealth, series 38, nr. 2, June 1992.
Grossman, G.M. and E. Helpman, 1991, Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy (MITPress, Cambridge, Massachusetts).
Haan, M. de and S. Keuning, 1996, Taking the Environment into Account; The NAMEA-Approach. Review of Income and Wealth, Series 42, Number 2.
Harrison, A., 1990, Major Changes Proposed for the Next SNA: an Overview. Review of Income and Wealth, Series 36, No. 4, pp. 335-352.
Harrison, A., 1994, The SNA: 1968-1993 and Beyond. In Kenessey (1994), pp. 169-197. Herrick, B. and C.P. Kindleberger, 1983, Economic Development (McGraw Hill Book Co, Singapore).
Hicks, J.R., 1939, Value and Capital (University Press, Oxford).
Hicks, J.R., 1940, The Valuation of Social Income. Economica, pp. 105- 124.
Hicks, J.R., 1948, The Valuation of Social Income- A Comment on Professor Kuznets' Reflections. Economica, pp. 163-172.
Holub, H.W. and G. Tappeiner, 1997, Modeling on the Basis of Models. Review of Income and Wealth, Series 43, Number 4, pp. 505-510.
Hopwood, A.G. and P. Miller, 1994, Accounting as Social and Institutional Practice, Cambridge Studies in Management, Volume 24 (Cambridge University Press, 1994).
IMF, 1977, Balance of Payments Manual. (IMF, Washington).
INSEE, 1976, Système Elargi de Comptabilité Nationale. Les Collections de l'INSEE, n. 198-199, Series C, no. 44-45 (INSEE, Paris).
Inter-Secretariat Working Group on National Accounts (ISWGNA), 1992, National Accounts and Balances : System of National Accounts (SNA). Report on decisions by the ISGNA on specific issues concerning the revised SNA at its 14-16 December 1992 meeting held at OECD, Paris.
Ivanov, Y., 1987, Possibilities and Problems of Reconciliation of the SNA and the MPS. Review of Income and Wealth, pp. 1-18.
Jaszi, G., 1971, An Economic Accountant’s Ledger. Survey of Current Business, 50th Anniversary Issue, pp. 183-227.
Jaszi, G., 1986, An Economic Accountant's Audit. American Economic Association Papers and Proceedings, pp. 411-417.
Kazemier, B., S. Keuning and P. van de Ven, 1999, Measuring Well-being with an Integrated System of Economic and Social Accounts : an Application of the SESAME Approach to the Netherlands, National Accounts Occasional Papers nr. 90 (Statistics Netherlands, Voorburg).
Kazemier, B. and J. Exel, 1992, The Allocation of Time in the Netherlands in the Context of the SNA; a Module. National Accounts Occasional Paper nr. 52 (Statistics Netherlands, Voorburg).
Kets, W. and A. Lejour, 2003, Sectoral TFP Developments in the OECD, CPB Memorandum (Dutch Centre for Economic Policy Analysis, The Hague).
King, G., 1936, Two Tracts. (The Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore).
Kendrick, J.W., 1991, Appraising the U.S. Output and Productivity Estimates for Government- Where Do We Go From Here? Review of Income and Wealth, Series 37, No. 2, pp. 149-158.
Kendrick, J.W., 1972, Economic Accounts and Their Uses (Mc GrawHill, 1972).
Kendrick, J.W. (ed.), 1996, The New System of National Accounts (Kluwer, Boston).
Kenessey, Z (ed.), 1994, The Accounts of Nations (IOS Press, Amsterdam).
Keuning, S., 1997, SESAME: an Integrated Economic and Social Accounting System. International Statistical Review, Volume 65 (1).
Keuning, S., 1998, Interaction between National Accounts and Socio-Economic Policy. Review of Income and Wealth, Series 44, Number 3, pp. 345-360.
Klein, L.R., 1983, Lectures in Econometrics (North-Holland, Amsterdam).
Konijn, P.J.A., 1994, The Make and Use of Commodities by Industries (Twente University, Enschede).
Kravis, I.B., 1984, Comparative Studies of National Incomes and Prices. Journal of Economic Literature, vol. XXII, pp. 1-39.
Kurz, H.D. and N. Salvadori, 2000, Çlassical’ Roots of Input-Output Analysis: A Short Account of its Long Prehistory. Economic Systems Research, Volume 12, Number 2, pp. 153-180.
Kuznets, S., 1938, Commodity Flow and Capital Formation. (National Bureau of Economic Research, New York).
Kuznets, S., 1941, National Income and Its Composition, 1919-1938. (National Bureau of Economic Research, New York).
Kuznets, S., 1944, National Product, War and Prewar: Some Comments on Professor Kuznets' Study and a Reply by Professor Kuznets. The Review of Economic Statistics, pp. 126-135.
Kuznets, S., 1946, National Income: a Summary of Findings. (National Bureau of Economic Research, New York).
Kuznets, S., 1948a, Discussion of the new Department of Commerce Income Series; National Income: a New Version. The Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. XXX, Number 3, pp. 151-179.
Kuznets, S., 1948b, On the Valuation of Social Income- Reflection on professor Hicks' article. Economica, pp. 1-16 (part I), pp. 116-131 (part II).
Landefeld, J.S. and S.H. McCulla, 2000, Accounting for Nonmarket Household Production Within a National Accounts Framework. Review of Income and Wealth, Series 46, Number 3, pp. 289-308.
Leontief, W.W., 1936, Quantitative Input and Output Relations in the Economic System of the United States. Review of Economic Statistics, vol. XVIII, No. 3, pp. 105-125.
Lewis, R. and D. Pendrill, 1985, Advanced Financial Accounting (Pitman Publishing Ltd, London)
Lundberg, E., 1984, Lundberg on Kuznets. In: H.W. Spiegel and W.J. Samuels, Contemporary economists in perspective, Part II (JAI Press Inc., London), pp. 523-542.
Maddison, A., 1982, Phases of Capitalist Development (Oxford University Press).
Maddison, A., 1987, Growth and Slowdown in Advanced Capitalist Countries; Techniques of Quantitative Assessment. Journal of Economic Literature, vol. XXV, pp. 649-698.
Maddison, A. and B. van Ark, 1994, The International Comparison of Real Product and Productivity. Paper presented at the 23th IARIW Conference, St. Andrews, New Brunswick, Canada.
Magnus, J.R. and M.S. Morgan, 1999, Methodology and Tacit Knowledge; Two Experiments in Econometrics (John Wiley & Sons, New York).
Magnus, J.R., J.W. van Tongeren and A.F. de Vos, National Accounts Estimation Using Indicator Ratios. Review of Income and Wealth, Series 46, Number 3, pp. 329-350.
Maki, Atsushi and Nishiyama, Shigeru, 1993, Consistency between Macro- and Micro-Data Sets in the Japanese Household Sector. Review of Income and Wealth, Series 39 (2), pp. 195-208.
Malinvaud, E., 1989, Observation in Macroeconomic Theory Building. European Economic Review, 33, pp. 205-223.
Margolis, J., 1952, National Economic Accounting: Reorientation Needed. The Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. XXXIV, number 4, pp. 291-304.
Maurice, R. (ed.), 1968, National Accounts Statistics; Sources and Methods (Central Statistical Office, London)
Meade, J.A. and R. Stone, 1941, The Construction of Tables of National Income, Expenditure, Savings and Investment. Economic Journal, pp. 216-231.
Meek, R.L., 1962, The Economics of Physiocracy: Essays and Translations (Cambridge Mass: Harvard University Press).
Miller, R.E and P.D. Blair, 1985, Input-output Analysis; Foundations and Extensions (Prentice Hall, New Jersey).
Mishan, E.J., 1969, The Costs of Economic Growth. (Penguin Books Ltd, New York). Modigliani, F., 2001, Adventures of an Economist, Texere, New York.
Morgan, M., 1990, The History of Econometric Ideas. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).
Morrison, M. and M.S. Morgan, 1999, Models as Mediators (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).
Neuburger, H., 1996, How Far Should Economic Theory and Economic Policy Affect the Design of National Accounts. Paper Presented at the 24th IARIW Conference, Lillehammer, Norway.
Nobes, C.W. and R.H. Parker, 1985, Comparative International Accounting (St. Martin’s Press, New York).
Nooteboom, L., 1978, Veertig Jaren Nationale Rekeningen ["Fourty Years National Accounts"]. In: STATISTICS NETHERLANDS, Denken en Meten; Statistische Opstellen (Staatsuitgeverij, Den Haag), pp. 1-17.
Nordhaus, W. and J. Tobin, 1972, Is Growth Obsolete? in: National Bureau of Economic Research, Economic Growth. (Columbia University Press, New York).
North, D., 1990, Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance (Cambridge University Press, New York).
Novak, G.J., 1975, Reliability Criteria for National Accounts. Review of Income and Wealth, Series 21, Vol. 3, pp. 323-344.
OECD, 1981, The Measurement of Scientific and Technical Activities; "Frascati Manual" (OECD, Paris).
OECD, 2000, A System of Health Accounts (OECD, Paris).
OEEC, 1951, A Simplified System of National Accounts. (OEEC, Paris).
OEEC, 1952, A Standardised System of National Accounts. (OEEC, Paris).
Ohlsson, I, 1953, On National Accounting. (Konjunkturinstitutet Stockholm).
Okker, R., 1998, Challenges for Model Builders, CPB-report 1998 (3), p. 3 (CPB, The Hague).
Okun, A.M, 1971, Social Welfare has no Price Tag. Survey of Current Business, 50th Anniversary Issue, pp. 129-133.
Patinkin, D., 1976, Keynes and Econometrics: on the Interaction Between the Macroeconomic Revolutions of the Interwar Period. Econometrica, Vol. 44, Number 6, pp. 1091-1123.
Pen, J., 1971, Income Distribution (Penguin Book Lttd., Harmondsworth, Middlesex, England).
Phillips, A., 1955, The Tableau Economique as a Simple Leontief Model. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69, pp. 137-144.
Polanyi, M., 1962, Personal Knowledge; Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy (Routledge & Kegan Paul, London).
Porter, T.H., 1995, Trust in Numbers; the Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life (Princeton University Press, Princeton New Jersey).
Postner, H., 1994, A Historical Note on Quadruple-Entry Bookkeeping. In: Kenessey (1994), pp. 237-245.
Postner, H., 1995, The 1993 Revised System of National Accounts: Where Do We Go From Here? Review of Income and Wealth, Series 41, Number 4, pp. 459-470.
Pyatt, G., 1991, SAMs, the SNA and National Accounting Capabilities. Review of Income and Wealth, Series 37, No. 2, pp. 177-198.
Pyatt, G., 1994, Intellectual Foundations for the 1968 SNA. In: Kenessey (1994), pp. 246-250.
Pyatt, G., 1999, Some Relationships between T-Accounts, Input-Output Tables and Social Accounting Matrices. Economic Systems Research, Volume 11, Number 4, pp. 365-389.
Pyatt, G. and J.I. Round, 1977, Social Accounting Matrices for Development Planning. Review of Income and Wealth 23(4), pp. 339-364.
Pyatt, G. and E. Thorbecke, 1976, Planning Techniques For a Better Future. (ILO, Geneva).
Rangelova, R., 2000, Bulgaria’s National Income and Economic Growth, 1913-45. Review of Income and Wealth, Series 46, Number 2, pp. 231-248.
Reich, U.P., 1993, The Dutch School of Thought in National Accounts. In: Vries et al. (1993), pp. 257-270.
Richter, J., 1994, Use and Misuse Of National Accounts from a Modelling Perspective. Review of Income and Wealth, Series 40, pp. 99-110.
Ruggles, R., 1990, A Note on the Revision of the United Nations System of National Accounts. Review of Income and Wealth, Series 36, Number 4, pp. 413-420.
Ruggles, R., 1996, The United Nations System of National Accounts and the Integration of Micro and Macro Data. In: Kendrick (1996), pp. 387-416.
Ruggles, R., 1999, The Middle Years of the International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, 1962-87. Review of Income and Wealth, Series 45, Number 3, pp. 397-408.
Ruggles, N.D. and R. Ruggles, 1970, The Design of Economic Accounts (National Bureau of Economic Research, New York).
Ruggles, R. and N.D. Ruggles, 1971, The Evolution of National Accounts and the National Data Base. Survey of Current Business, 50th Anniversary Issue, pp. 152-161.
Ruggles, R. and N.D. Ruggles, 1986, The Integration of Macro and Micro Data for the Household Sector. Review of Income and Wealth, Series 21, No. 2.
Ruggles, N.D. and R. Ruggles, 1992, Household and Enterprise Saving and Capital Formation In the United States: A Market Transactions View. Review of Income and Wealth, Series 38 (2), pp. 119-164.
Ruggles, N.D. and R. Ruggles, 1999, Macro- and Microdata Analyses and Their Integration (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham UK).
Ruggles, R., 1991, Statistical Measurements for Economic Systems in Transition: Strategy for Implementing the UN System of National Accounts (SNA). Paper Presented at International Forum Economies in Transition: Statistical Measures Now and In the Future, 15-17 October 1990, Sochi, USSR.
Samuelson, P.A. and W.D. Nordhaus, 1985, Economics (McGraw-Hill, New York).
Schumpeter, J.A., 1945, History of Economic Analysis (Allen & Unwin, London).
Séruzier, M., 1996, Construire les Comptes de la Nation selon le SCN 1993 (Economica, Paris).
Seton, F., 1954, The Social Accounts of the Soviet Union in 1934. Review of Economics and Statistics, 36, pp. 290-308.
Sherwood, M.K, 1999, Output of the Property and Casualty Insurance Industry. Canadian Journal of Economics, Volume 32 (2), Special Issue on Service Sector Productivity and the Productivity Paradox, pp. 518-546.
Smeeding, T.M. and D.H. Weinberg, 2001, Toward a Uniform Definition of Household Income. Review of Income and Wealth, Series 47 (1), pp. 1-24.
Smith, A., 1776, The Wealth of Nations (Penguin Classics, 1979, Harmonsworth, England).
Spengler, J.J., 1961, Quantification in Economics: its History. In: D. Lerner (ed.), Quantity and Quality, New York, The Free Press, pp. 129-211.
Spiegel, H.W., 1983, The Growth of Economic Thought (Duke University Press, Durham, North Carolina).
Standing Statistical Commission, CMEA, 1969, Basic Methodological Rules for the Compilation of the Statistical Balance of the National Economy. [= Material Product System69] (Moscow).
Steenge, A.E. and P.J.A. Konijn, 1993, Input-Output and National Accounts. In Vries et al (1993), pp. 193-208.
Stone, R., 1947, Definition and Measurement of the National Income and Related Totals. Appendix in UN (1947).
Stone, R., 1951a, The Use and Development of National Income and Expenditure Estimates. In: Lessons of the British war economy, D.N. Chester (ed.) (Cambridge University Press), pp. 83-101.
Stone, R., 1951b, The Role of Measurement in Economics, The New March Lectures 1948-1949 (Cambridge University Press).
Stone, R., 1954, The Measurement of Consumers’ Expenditure and Behaviour in the United Kingdom, 1920-1938, vol. I (Cambridge University Press).
Stone, R. et al., 1962, A Social Accounting Matrix for 1960. Volume 2 of 'A Programme of Growth' (Chapman and Hall, Cambridge).
Stone, R., 1971, An Integrated System of Demographic, Manpower and Social statistics and its Links with the System of National Economic Accounts. Sankhya: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Series B 33, pp. 1-184.
Stone, R., 1974, System of National Accounts (SNA); Supplementing the National Accounts for Purposes of Welfare measurement. Paper presented at the eighteenth session of the Statistical Commission of the United Nations Economic and Social Council.
Stone, R., 1981, Balancing the National Accounts: the Adjustment of Initial Estimates – a Neglected Stage in Measurement. In A. Ingham and A.M. Ulph (eds.), Demand, Equilibrium and Trade (MacMillan, London).
Stone, R, 1984, Where Are We Now? A Short Account of the Development of Input-output Studies and their Present Trends. Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Input-output Techniques (UN, New York).
Stone, R., 1985, Richard Stone. In: Les Prix Nobel 1984 (Almqvist and Wicksell International, Stockholm), pp. 256-287.
Stone, R., 1986a, Social Accounting: The State of Play. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Vol 88, number 3, pp. 453-472.
Stone, R., 1986b, Progress in Balancing the National Accounts. In D. Ironmonger et al. (eds.), National Income and Economic Progress (MacMillan, London).
Stone, R., 1997, Some British Empiricists in the Social Sciences 1650-1900 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
Studenski, P., 1958, The Income of Nations. (New York University Press, New York). Summers, R. and A. Heston, 1991, The Penn World Table (mark 5). Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106 (2), pp. 327-68.
Sunga, P.S., 1984, An Alternative to the Current Treatment of Interest as Transfer in the United Nations and Canadian Systems of National Accounts. Review of Income and Wealth.
Sunga, P.S. and J.L. Swinamer, 1986, Health Care Accounts – A Conceptual Framework and an Illustrative Example. Review of Income and Wealth.
Takema, T., 2000, Supply and Use Tables in Current and Constant Prices for the Netherlands; an Experience of Fifteen Years, National Accounts Occasional Papers nr 92 (Statistics Netherlands, Voorburg).
Tinbergen, J., 1936, Prae-advies over de vragen: Kan hier te lande, al dan niet na overheidsingrijpen, een verbetering van de binnenlandsche conjunctuur intreden, ook zonder verbetering van onze exportpositie? Welke leering kan ten aanzien van dit vraagstuk worden getrokken uit de ervaringen van andere landen? Vereniging voor de Staathuishoudkunde en de statistiek, Praeadviezen (Martinus Nijhoff, 's Gravenhage), pp. 62-108.
Tongeren, D. van and S. Keuning, 2002, The Relationship Between National Accounting and Government Accounting in the Netherlands (Statistics Netherlands, Voorburg).
Tuinen, H.K. van, 1993, Issues in Dutch National Accounting 1970-1985. In De Vries et al. (1993), pp. 19-32.
Turner, S., 1994, The Social Theory of Practice (Polity Press, Cambridge).
UN, 1947, Measurement of National Income and the Construction of Social Accounts. Studies and Reports on Statistical Methods no. 7 (UN, Geneva).
UN, 1953, A System of National Accounts and Supporting Tables. Studies in Methods, Series F No. 2, Rev. 1 (UN, New York).
UN, 1968, A System of National Accounts. Studies in Methods, Series F No. 2, Rev. 3 (UN, New York).
UN, 1975, Towards a System of Social and Demographic Statistics. Studies in Methods, Series F, No. 18 (UN, New York).
UN, 1977, Provisional International Guidelines on the National and Sectoral Balance-sheet and Reconciliation Accounts of the Systems of National Accounts. Statistical Papers, Series M, No. 60 (UN, New York).
UN, 1986, System of Statistical Balances of the National Economy of CMEA Member Countries. Studies in Method, Series F, No. 17, rev. 1, vol. I (UN, New York). UNDP (United Nations Development Programme), 1991, Human Development Report 1991. (Oxford University Press, New York).
UN, 2000, Links Between Business Accounting and National Accounting, Studies in Methods, Series F, No. 76 (UN, New York).
UN, 2002, Use of Macro Accounts in Policy Analysis, Studies in Methods, Series F, No. 81 (UN, New York).
UN, 2003a (forthcoming), Handbook on Nonprofit Institutions in the SNA (UN, New York).
UN, 2003b (forthcoming), Integrated Environmental and Economic Accounting 2003 (SEEA) (UN, New York).
Vanoli, A., 1986, Sur la Structure Générale du SCN à Partir de l'Expérience du Système Elargi de Comptabilité Nationale Français. Review of Income and Wealth, pp. 155-199.
Vanoli, A., 1999, Interest and Inflation Accounting. Review of Income and Wealth, Series 45, No. 3, pp. 279-302.
Vanoli, A., 2002, Une Histoire de la Comptabilité Nationale (La Découverte, Paris). Verbruggen, J.P. and G. Zalm, 1993, National Accounts and Modelling at the Central Planning Bureau. In De Vries et al. (1993), pp. 151-166.
Vries, W.M.F. De et al. (eds.), 1993, The Value Added of National Accounting (Statistics Netherlands, Voorburg).
Weitzman, M., 1976, On the Welfare Significance of National Product in a Dynamic Economy. Quarterly Journal of Economics, pp. 156-162.
Weale, M.R., 1988, The Reconciliation of Values, Volume and Prices in the National Accounts. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A 151, pp. 211-221.
Whelan, K., 2002, A Guide to U.S. Chain Aggregated NIPA Data. Review of Income and Wealth, series 48, number 2, pp. 217-234.
Wroe, D., P. Kenny, U. Rizki and I. Weerakkody, 1998, Reliability and Quality Indicators for National Accounts Aggregates (Office for National Statistics, London).
Young, A.H., 1987, Evaluation of GNP Estimates. Survey of Current Business 67 (8), pp. 18-42.
Zanden, J.L. van, 1993, Historical National Accounts. In: Vries et al (1993), pp. 229-242.