Elasticities of Substitution and Complementarity

Stern, David I (2008): Elasticities of Substitution and Complementarity. Unpublished.

Abstract

This paper develops a classification scheme of the many different definitions of elasticities of substitution and complementarity in the production case based on duality, gross and net substitution, elasticity type, and four different basic concepts of substitution and complementarity is developed. The classic Berndt-Wood dataset is used to show how the various elasticities differ. This variation is considerable and shows that the correct elasticity should be used for the intended purpose – there is no one true elasticity of substitution. The paper also reintroduces and clarifies Pigou’s contributions to the debate on the elasticity of substitution after seventy years of obscurity in which they have not been cited.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Microeconomics, history of economic thought, production, substitution, elasticity
• Subjects: B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B2 - History of Economic Thought since 1925 > B21 - Microeconomics; D - Microeconomics > D2 - Production and Organizations > D24 - Production; Cost; Capital and Total Factor Productivity; Capacity

References

Allen RGD (1934) A comparison between different definitions of complementary and competitive goods. Econometrica 2:168-175

Allen RGD (1938 [1964]) Mathematical Analysis for Economists. Macmillan, London

Berndt ER, Wood DO (1975) Technology, prices and the derived demand for energy. Review of Economics and Statistics 57:259-268

Berndt ER, Wood DO (1979) Engineering and econometric interpretations of energy-capital complementarity. American Economic Review 69:342-354

Bertoletti P (2005) Elasticities of substitution and complementarity a synthesis. Journal of Productivity Analysis 24:183–196

Blackorby C, Primont D, Russell RR (2007) The Morishima gross elasticity of substitution. Journal of Productivity Analysis 28:203–208

Blackorby C, Russell RR (1975) The Partial Elasticity of Substitution. Discussion Paper 75-1, Economics, University of California, San Diego

Blackorby C, Russell RR (1981) The Morishima elasticity of substitution symmetry, constancy, separability, and relationship to the Hicks and Allen elasticities. Review of Economic Studies 43:147-158

Blackorby C, Russell RR (1989) Will the real elasticity of substitution please stand up? (A comparison of the Allen/Uzawa and Morishima elasticities). American Economic Review 79:882-888

Blumenthal T, Levhari D, Ofer G, Sheshinski E (1971) Torat HaMehirim (Price Theory, in Hebrew). Akademon, Jerusalem

Broer P (2004) The Elasticities of Complementarity and Substitution. Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper TI 2004-101/1

Davis GC, Shumway CR (1996) To tell the truth about interpreting the Morishima elasticity of substitution. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics 44:173-182

de la Grandville O (1997) Curvature and the elasticity of substitution: straightening it out. Journal of Economics 66 (1):23-34

Färe R, Primont D (1990) A distance function approach to multioutput technologies. Southern Economic Journal 56(4):879-891

Färe R, Primont D (1995) Multi-Output Production and Duality Theory and Applications. Kluwer

Frondel M, Schmidt CM (2002) The capital-energy controversy: An artifact of cost shares? The Energy Journal 23(3):53-79

Hicks, JR (1932) Theory of Wages. Macmillan, London

Hicks, JR (1936) Distribution and economic progress a revised version. Review of Economic Studies 4(1):1-12

Hicks, JR (1970) Elasticity of substitution again substitutes and complements. Oxford Economic Papers 22(3):289-296

Hicks JR, Allen RGD (1934a) A reconsideration of the theory of value, part I. Economica 1:52-76

Hicks JR, Allen RGD (1934b) A reconsideration of the theory of value, part II. Economica 1:196-219

Hirschleifer J, Hirschleifer D (1997) Price Theory and Applications, 6th edition. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River NJ

Hunt LC, Lynk EL (1993) The interpretation of coefficients in multiplicative-logarithmic functions. Applied Economics 25:735-738

Kim HY (1992) The translog production function and variable returns to scale. Review of Economics and Statistics 74:546-552

Kim HY (2000) The Antonelli versus Hicks elasticity of complementary and inverse input demand systems. Australian Economic Papers 39:245-261

Lau LJ (1978) Applications of profit functions. In: Fuss M, McFadden D (eds) Production Economics a Dual Approach to Theory and Applications, Volume 1. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 133-216

Lerner AP (1933) Notes on the elasticity of substitution II: The diagrammatical representation. Review of Economic Studies 1 68-70

McFadden D (1963) Constant elasticity of substitution production functions. Review of Economic Studies 31:73-83

Morishima M (1967) A few suggestions on the theory of elasticity (in Japanese). Keizai Hyoron (Economic Review) 16:144-150

Mundlak Y (1968) Elasticities of substitution and the theory of derived demand. Review of Economic Studies 35:225-236

Pigou AC (1934) The elasticity of substitution. Economic Journal 44:232-241

Robinson JV (1933) The Economics of Imperfect Competition. Macmillan, London.

Samuelson PA (1974) Complementarity: An essay on the 40th anniversary of the Hicks-Allen revolution in demand theory. Journal of Economic Literature 12:1255-1289

Sato R, Koizumi T (1973) On the elasticities of substitution and complementarity. Oxford Economic Papers 25:44-56

Stern DI (1995) Measurement unit invariant coefficients in multiplicative-logarithmic functions. Applied Economics 27:451-454

Stern DI (2008) Derivation of the Hicks elasticity of substitution from the input distance function, Munich Personal RePEc Archive 12414.

Syrquin M, Hollender G (1982) Elasticities of substitution and complementarity the general case. Oxford Economic Papers 34:515-519

Thompson P, Taylor TG (1995) The capital-energy substitutability debate: a new look. The Review of Economics and Statistics 77:565-569

Uzawa H (1962) Production functions with constant elasticities of substitution. Review of Economic Studies 30:291-299