Mukherjee, Dipa (2007): Post-reform Trends in Wage-Differentials: A Decomposition Analysis for India. Published in: Indian Journal of Labour Economics , Vol. 50, No. 4 (December 2007)
Download (73kB) | Preview
Wage inequality often creates much broader socio-economic inequality and may even accentuate them. For attaining equitable development convergence in wages and earnings is therefore desirable. This paper explores trends and patterns in wage differentials in India in the post reform period. Using decomposition technique it compares trends in within group and between group disparities – across occupational group, gender, job type, and region. It is observed that while inter-group disparity or vertical differentials are coming down in terms of wage rates, they are increasing in terms of total earnings because of more than proportionate rise in disparity in labour demand and job availability. Intra-group wage differentials have increased among most of the occupations as also among several sub-groups, leading to polarization within groups. Decomposition analysis shows that wage differential across some groups are mainly due to the skill factor while for some other groups it is pure discrimination or unfavourable labour market conditions which is creating the wage differential. Only an inclusive growth strategy will lead to lowering of wage differentials and removal of disparities in living standards across space and people.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Post-reform Trends in Wage-Differentials: A Decomposition Analysis for India|
|Keywords:||Wages; Employment; Disparity; Occupational Choice; Decomposition|
|Subjects:||J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J3 - Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs > J31 - Wage Level and Structure; Wage Differentials
J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J2 - Demand and Supply of Labor > J21 - Labor Force and Employment, Size, and Structure
J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J7 - Labor Discrimination > J71 - Discrimination
J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J2 - Demand and Supply of Labor > J24 - Human Capital; Skills; Occupational Choice; Labor Productivity
J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J2 - Demand and Supply of Labor > J23 - Labor Demand
|Depositing User:||Rajarshi Majumder|
|Date Deposited:||17. Jan 2009 07:19|
|Last Modified:||12. Feb 2013 12:02|
Blinder, A. (1973) – ‘Wage Discrimination: Reduced Form and Structural Estimates’, Journal of Human Resources, Vol. 8 (4)
Duraiswamy, P. (2002) – ‘Changes in the Returns to Education in India, 1983-94: By Gender, Age-Cohort and Location’, Economics of Education Review, Vol. 21 (6)
Dutta, Puja Vasudeva (2005) – ‘Accounting for Wage Inequality in India’, PRUS Working Papers 29, Poverty Research Unit at Sussex, University of Sussex
Galbraith, JK, D. Roy Chowdhury and S Shrivastava (2004) – ‘Pay Inequality in the Indian Manufacturing Sector, 1979-1998’, University of Texas Inequality Project Working Paper 28.
Katz, L. and D. Autor (1999) – ‘Changes in Wage Structure and Earnings Inequality’, in O. Ashenfelter & D. Card (eds) Handbook of Labor Economics, North Holland
Kingdon, G. G. (1998) – ‘Does the Labour Market Explain Lower Female Schooling in India?’ – Journal of Development Studies, Vol. 35 (1).
Kingdon, G. G. and J. Unni (2001) – ‘Education and Women’s Labour Market Outcomes in India’, Education Economics, Vol. 9 (2)
Mincer, J. (1974) – ‘Schooling, Experience and Earnings’, Columbia University Press, New York.
Oaxaca, R. (1973) – ‘Male-Female Differentials in Urban Labour Markets’, International Economic Review, Vol. 14
Wood, A. (1997) – ‘Openness and Wage Inequality in Developing Countries: The Latin American Challenge to East Asian Conventional Wisdom’, World Bank Economic Review, Vol. 11 (1).