Zhang, ZhongXiang (2003): Why Has China not Embraced a Global Cap-and-Trade Regime?
Download (81kB) | Preview
Many economic studies suggest that China would reap significant benefits from participating in a global cap-and-trade regime. The question then is that even if such a regime is so beneficial to China, why China has consistently refused in international negotiations even to discuss its participation in it. In this paper, we look at this issue from the following perspectives: a) from the point of view of fairness, how do developing countries including China and India perceive emissions caps in the first place?; b) why have China and India been sceptical to international emissions trading?; c) how is an inflow of CDM investment in China perceived politically in comparison with the exports of emissions permits to the U.S.?; d) what are the implications of “lock in” to emissions cap, in particular no rules and principles for setting emissions targets for the commitment periods subsequent to Kyoto?; e) how to address the complex undertaking of setting emissions caps for developing countries, which must be linked to future, unobserved levels in comparison with the historically observed levels for industrialized countries?. To our knowledge, this is the first paper to analyse why China has not embraced an international greenhouse gas emissions trading scheme, thus pointing out efforts/directions towards getting the country into such a scheme. Thus, the paper is of significant policy relevance.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Why Has China not Embraced a Global Cap-and-Trade Regime?|
|Keywords:||Cap-and-trade regime; Clean development mechanism; International climate negotiations; Kyoto Protocol; China; India|
|Subjects:||Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q52 - Pollution Control Adoption Costs; Distributional Effects; Employment Effects
Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q4 - Energy > Q48 - Government Policy
Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q54 - Climate; Natural Disasters; Global Warming
Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q58 - Government Policy
|Depositing User:||ZhongXiang Zhang|
|Date Deposited:||16. Jan 2009 06:52|
|Last Modified:||13. Feb 2013 12:46|
Financial Times (2007a), China about to Become Top Carbon Emitter, April 19, Available at: http://www.ft.com/cms/s/d5289ae4-ee25-11db-8584-000b5df10621,dwp_uuid=f6e7043e-6d68-11da-a4df-0000779e2340.html.
Financial Times (2007b), China Rebuts Carbon Emission Forecast, April 26, Available at: http://www.ft.com/cms/s/3b8459ca-f3eb-11db-88aa-000b5df10621,dwp_uuid=9c33700c-4c86-11da-89df-0000779e2340.html.
Harvey, R., Kruger, J., Irving, W. (2003), U.S. Experience with SO2 and NOx Allowance Allocations, Clean Air Markets Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
Löschel, A. and Z.X. Zhang (2002), The Economic and Environmental Implications of the US Repudiation of the Kyoto Protocol and the Subsequent Deals in Bonn and Marrakech, Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv - Review of World Economics, Vol. 138, No. 4, pp. 711-746.
McKibbin, W. J. and P.J. Wilcoxen (2002), Climate Change Policy After Kyoto: A Blueprint for a Realistic Approach, Washington: The Brookings Institution.
People’s Daily (1997), Head of the Chinese Delegation Expounds China’s Stance on Global Climate Change, Overseas Edition, December 9.
Sharma, A. (1998), Climate No Headway. Down to Earth 7, Centre for Science and Environment, New Delhi.
Stewart, R.B. and J.B. Wiener (2003), Reconstructing Climate Policy: Beyond Kyoto, American Enterprise Press, Washington, DC.
UNFCCC (1999), Mechanisms Pursuant to Articles 6, 12 and 17 of the Kyoto Protocol: Synthesis of Proposals by Parties on Principles, Modalities, Rules and Guidelines – Note by the Chairman, United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), FCCC/SB/1999/INF.2/Add.2, Bonn.
Weyant, J.P. (ed., 1999). The Cost of the Kyoto Protocol: A Multi-model Evaluation. Energy Journal, Vol. 20 (Special Issue on the Cost of the Kyoto Protocol), pp. 1-398.
Zhang, Z.X. (1998), Greenhouse Gas Emissions Trading and the World Trading System, Journal of World Trade, Vol. 32, No. 5, pp. 219-239.
Zhang, Z.X. (2000), Estimating the Size of the Potential Market for the Kyoto Flexibility Mechanisms, Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv - Review of World Economics, Vol. 136, No. 3, pp. 491-521.
Zhang, Z.X. (2004), Meeting the Kyoto Targets: The Importance of Developing Country Participation, Journal of Policy Modeling, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp. 3-19.
Zhang, Z.X. (2006), Cutting Carbon Emissions While Making Money: A Wishful Thinking or A Win-Win Opportunity?, The Keynote Address at the Plenary Session on Making Money from Saving Carbon at the 29th International Association for Energy Economics International Conference, Potsdam, Germany, June 8.