Munich Personal RePEc Archive
Login | Create Account

Séparabilité des audits et du contrôle de gestion en vue de contrôler l'identité organisationnelle

Bonache, Adrien and Bessour, M. (2009): Séparabilité des audits et du contrôle de gestion en vue de contrôler l'identité organisationnelle. Unpublished.

[img]
Preview
PDF - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
179Kb

Abstract

Objective. The aim of this article is to show that the audits aren't perfect substitute but additional of management control. Study design. We make out from a literature review and well-known cases some propositions and we search to give credit to our principal proposition with one exploratory case study: the internal audit insufficiency to control alone the organization. The case studied (Total) and the three respondents were chosen relatively to their relevance for our research questions. Results. It could be possible to infer internal audit insufficiency to put alone the organization under control.

Item Type:MPRA Paper
Original Title:Séparabilité des audits et du contrôle de gestion en vue de contrôler l'identité organisationnelle
Language:French
Keywords:management control, internal audit, external audit, internal control, environmental economics
Subjects:M - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting > M4 - Accounting and Auditing
ID Code:12959
Deposited By:Adrien B. BONACHE
Deposited On:23. Jan 2009 19:50
Last Modified:03. Aug 2011 14:28
References:

Amintas A., in Yves Dupuy (1999), Faire de la recherché en contrôle de gestion, Chapitre 1 : La crise du contrôle de gestion comme crise des savoirs gestionnaires.

Ashby R.(1956), An introduction to cybernetics.

Brunsson N.(1989), The organization of hypocrisy, Chichester, John Wiley and Sons.

Clarkson M.B.E.(1995), « a stakeholder framework for analysing and evaluating corporate social performance », Academy of Management review, 20(1), pp.92-117.

Dupuy Y. in Yves Dupuy et Pierre-Louis Dubois(2007), Connaissances et management, chapitre 3 Contrôlabilité des organisations et principe de la variété requise, ouvrage collectif en hommage à Robert REIX.

Kaplan A.(1964), The logic of Inquiry, San Francisco: Chandler. KYDLAND F.E. et PRESCOTT E.C.(1977), Rules rather than discretion: the inconsistency of optimal plans.

Martory B.(2000), “La valeur ajoutée sociale, principes d’évaluation”, colloque de pesor, juin 2000.

Mintzberg H.(1982), Structure et dynamique des organisations, Les éditions d’organisation.

Power M. (2005), La société de l’audit, éd. La découverte.

Ramachandra V.S. (1998), Phantom in the brain, Harper Collins, New York.

Renard J. (2006), Audit interne: théorie et pratique

Rowan B.et Meyer J. W.(1977), “Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony”, American Journal of Sociology, Vol.83, n°2, pp. 340-363.

Rowan B.et Meyer J. W.(1978), The structure of educational organizations, pp.78-109; in MEYER M. W. et al, ed. environments and organizations, San Francisco, Jossey-Bass Inc., 1980.

Sigglekow N. (2007), « Persuasion with Case Studies », Academy of management journal, 50(1), pp.20-24.

Tinbergen J. (1952), On the Theory of Economic Policy.

Weick K.E. (1993), “The collapse of sensemaking in organizations; The Mann Gulch Disaster”, Administrative Science Quaterly; dec 1993; 38, 4; Research Library Core.

Weick K.E.(1996), “Drop your tools : An allegory for organizational studies”, Administrative science Quaterly, June 1996; 41, 2; Research Library Core pp.301-313.

Yin R.K. (2003), Case Study Research: Design and Methods, Sage Publication.

All papers reproduced by permission. Reproduction and distribution subject to the approval of the copyright owners.
Repository Staff Only: item control page

LMU-Logo
MPRA is a RePEc service hosted by
the Munich University Library in Germany.