Nwaobi, Godwin (2009): Fiscal Responsibility And Economic Efficiency:A Functional Approach.
Download (1MB) | Preview
In both developed and developing countries, there are basically two main sources of economic instability: exogenous shocks and inappropriate policies. Exogenous shock (terms-of-trade shocks, natural disasters and capital flow reversals) can throw an economy into disequilibrium and therefore require compensatory action. On the other hand, a disequilibrium can be self-induced by poor economic macroeconomic management such as an excessively loose fiscal stance. Therefore, economic crisis are often the result of external shocks and poor management. While the worlds of agriculture are vast, varied and rapidly changing, with the right policies and supportive investments at local, national and global levels, today’s agriculture offers new opportunities to hundreds of millions of rural poor to move out of poverty. Similarly, the construction industry is an essential contributor to the process of development. Roads, dams, irrigation works, schools, houses, hospitals, factories and other construction works are the physical foundations on which development efforts and improved living standards are established. This paper there argued that an efficient and functional fiscal policy can have a direct impact on the poor through the distributional implications of tax policy as well as public spending. However, the genuine reformer is distinguished by courage which is that signal that separates the genuine reformer (undertaking transition) from the weak government (hoping to disguise itself).
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Fiscal Responsibility And Economic Efficiency:A Functional Approach|
|Keywords:||fiscalpolicy; fiscaldeficit; world; policies; reforms; debt; exchangerate; monetarypolicy; inflation; centralbank; government; poverty; efficiency; revenue; shocks|
|Subjects:||H - Public Economics > H7 - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations > H70 - General
E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E6 - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, Macroeconomic Policy, and General Outlook > E62 - Fiscal Policy
H - Public Economics > H5 - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies > H50 - General
H - Public Economics > H2 - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue > H20 - General
H - Public Economics > H6 - National Budget, Deficit, and Debt > H60 - General
H - Public Economics > H3 - Fiscal Policies and Behavior of Economic Agents > H30 - General
D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics > D61 - Allocative Efficiency; Cost-Benefit Analysis
|Depositing User:||GODWIN NWAOBI|
|Date Deposited:||26. Jan 2009 19:11|
|Last Modified:||13. Feb 2013 05:42|
Aaron, H. (1982) Economic Effects of social security, Washington: Brookings Institution
Barro, R.J. (1989) “The Ricardian Approach to Budget Deficits” Journal of Economic perspectives Vol 3 No 2 37-54
Bird, R.M. and O. Oliver (1990) (ed) Taxation in developing Countries, Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press
Blejer, M and A Cheasty (1991) “The Measurement of Fiscal Deficits: Analytical and Methodological issues”, Journal of Economic Literatures, Vol XXIX December, 1644-1678
Boskin, M.J. (1982) “Federal Government Deficits: Some Myths and Realities” American Economic Review, May pp 296-303
Brennan, G. and J.M. Buchanan (1980) The Power to Tax: Analytical Foundations of Fiscal Constitution, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Briltain, J. (1972) The Payroll Tax for Social Security, Washington: Brookings Institution.
Broadway, R.S et al (1994) “The Reform of Fiscal system in developing and emerging market economies: A Federalism Perspective”, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 1259
Buiter, W. (1983) “Measurement of the Public Sector Deficit and its implications for policy Evaluation and Design”, International Monetary Funds Staff Papers., June 30 (2) Pp 306-49
Burgress, R and N sterm (1993) ‘Taxation and Development”, Journal of Economic Literature Vol. XXXI (June) 762-830