Munro, Alistair and Valente, Marieta (2008): Green goods: are they good or bad news for the environment? Evidence from a laboratory experiment on impure public goods.
Download (322kB) | Preview
An impure public good is a commodity that combines public and private characteristics in fixed proportions. Green goods such as dolphin-friendly tuna or green electricity programs provide increasings popular examples of impure goods. We design an experiment to test how the presence of impure public goods affects pro-social behaviour. We set parameters, such that from a theoretical point of view the presence of the impure public good is behaviorally irrelevant. In a baseline setting, where the impure public good provides only small contributions to the public good. We observe that on aggregate pro-social behaviour, defined as total contributions to the public good, is lower in the presence of the impure good. Some individuals do not alter their decisions, but roughly two fifths of subjects make a lower contribution to the public good in the presence of the impure public good. On the contrary, in the case where the impure public good favours the public good component at the expense of private earnings, individuals are unaffected in their behaviour. We conclude that the presence of green goods which have only a small environmental component may reduce pro-environmental behaviour.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Green goods: are they good or bad news for the environment? Evidence from a laboratory experiment on impure public goods|
|Keywords:||green goods; impure public goods; pro-social behaviour; social norms; experimental economics|
|Subjects:||Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q50 - General
H - Public Economics > H4 - Publicly Provided Goods > H41 - Public Goods
D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics > D64 - Altruism; Philanthropy
C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C9 - Design of Experiments > C91 - Laboratory, Individual Behavior
|Depositing User:||Alistair Munro|
|Date Deposited:||27. Jan 2009 10:25|
|Last Modified:||14. Feb 2013 03:02|
Andreoni, J. (1990), "Impure Altruism and Donations to Public Goods: A Theory of Warm-Glow Giving", The Economic Journal, Vol. 100, No. 401, pp. 464-477.
Batson, C. D. (2002), "Addressing the altruism question experimentally", in Altruism and altruistic love: Science, philosophy, and religion in dialogue, Post, S. G., L. G. Underwood, J. P. Schloss, and W. B. Hurlbut (eds.), pp. 89-105, New York: Oxford University Press.
Batson, C. D., D. Kobrynowicz, J. L. Dinnerstein , H. C. Kampf, and A. D. Wilson (1997), "In a very different voice: unmasking moral hypocrisy", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 73, No. 6, pp. 1335-1348.
Camerer, C. F. (2003), Behavioral Game Theory - experiments in strategic interaction, New York and New Jersey: Russell Sage Foundation and Princeton University Press.
Cornes, R. and T. Sandler (1984), "Easy Riders, Joint Production, and Public Goods", The Economic Journal, Vol. 94, No. 375, pp. 580-598.
Cornes, R. and T. Sandler (1994), "The comparative static properties of the impure public good model", Journal of Public Economics, Vol. 54, No. 3, pp. 403-421.
Dana, J., D. M. Cain, and R. Dawes (2006), "What you don't Know Won't Hurt me: Costly (but quiet) Exit in a Dictator Game", Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 100, No. 2, pp. 193-201.
Dana, J., R. A. Weber, and J. Kuang (2007), "Exploiting moral wiggle room: experiments demonstrating an illusory preference for fairness", Economic Theory, Vol. 33, No. 1, pp. 67-80.
Davis, D. D. and C. A. Holt (1993), Experimental Economics, Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press. Eckel, C. C. and P. J. Grossman (1996), "Altruism in Anonymous Dictator Games", Games and Economic Behavior, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 181-191.
Fischbacher, U. (2007), "z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments", Experimental Economics, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 171-178.
Hollander, H. (1990), "A Social Exchange Approach to Voluntary Cooperation", The American Economic Review, Vol. 80, No. 5, pp. 1157-1167.
Kahneman, D., J. L. Knetsch, and R. H. Thaler (1986), "Fairness and the Assumptions of Economics", The Journal of Business, Vol. 59, No. 4, pp. S285-S300.
Karlan, D. and J. List (2007), "Does Price Matter in Charitable Giving? Evidence from a Large-Scale Natural Field Experiment", The American Economic Review, Vol. 97, No. 5, pp. 1774-1793.
Kotchen, M. J. (2005), "Impure public goods and the comparative statics of environmentally friendly consumption", Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Vol. 49, No. 2, pp. 281-300.
Kotchen, M. J. (2006), "Green Markets and the Private Provision of Public Goods", Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 114, No. 4, pp. 816-834.
Kunda, Z. (1990), "The Case for Motivated Reasoning", Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 180, No. 3, pp. 480-498. Lazear, E. P., U. Malmendier and R. A. Weber (2005), "Sorting in experiments with application to social sciences", Working paper, http://www.andrew.cmu.edu/user/rweber/papers.htm.
Nyborg, K. (2003), "The Impact of Public Policy on Social and Moral Norms: Some Examples", Journal of Consumer Policy, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp. 259-277.
OECD (2001), Policies to Enhance Sustainable Development (Complete Edition - ISBN 9264186611), SourceOECD Environment & Sustainable Development.