Bhattacharyya, Surajit and Saxena, Arunima (2009): Does the Firm Size Matter? An Empirical Enquiry into the Performance of Indian Manufacturing Firms. Forthcoming in: PES Business Review (June 2009)
This is the latest version of this item.
Download (235kB) | Preview
The Law of Proportionate Effect depicts that firm’s growth rate is independent of its size; Gibrat (1931). Some of the existing studies support the Gibrat’s Law: Hymer and Pashigian (1962), Mansfield (1962), among others. However, Gale (1972), Shepherd (1972) and recently Punnose (2008) report a positive relationship, while Haines (1970) and Evans (1987) observe an inverse relationship between firm size and profitability. Baumol (1959) opined that rate of return increases with firm size. Therefore, the extant empirical research on the firm size – performance relationship provides inconclusive results.
Manufacturing firms’ data from the Steel and Electrical & Electronics (EE) industries are taken from CMIE Prowess database for the period 2004-05 to 2006-07. Results show that firm size affects current profitability: positively in the Steel and negatively in the other. Some more determinants of firm performance are explored. Retained earnings have negative impact on profitability in Steel but, positive in EE. Bank credit is found negatively significant in both the industries. Market share of firms and industry concentration ratio (CR4) although inconsistently are the other significant determinants of firms’ performance. Firms’ market value (Q) is found positively significant for both the industries. This signifies that high market value of firms reflects their goodwill, knowledge stock and prospective investment opportunities which positively influence the firms’ performance. The significance of having high brand equity which the corporate firms thrive for becomes apparent. Interestingly, the impact of size is affected by firms’ market value: firm size positively affects profitability both in Steel and EE. Furthermore, ineffectiveness of Law of Proportionate Effect is strengthened when tested over the combined data of Steel and EE firms. The short-run dynamism in firm performance is also impacted by presence of Tobin’s Q.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Does the Firm Size Matter? An Empirical Enquiry into the Performance of Indian Manufacturing Firms|
|Keywords:||Gibrat’s law, firm size, profitability, Tobin’s Q, manufacturing firms|
|Subjects:||L - Industrial Organization > L6 - Industry Studies: Manufacturing
M - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting > M2 - Business Economics > M21 - Business Economics
|Depositing User:||Surajit Bhattacharyya|
|Date Deposited:||17. May 2009 00:22|
|Last Modified:||12. Feb 2013 13:05|
Amirkhalkhali S. and Mukhopadhyay A. (1993), "The influence of Size and R&D on the Growth of Firms in the U.S.", Eastern Economic Journal, 19: 223-233.
Audretsch D.B., Klomp L., Santarelli E. and Thurik A. R. (2002), "Gibrat's Law: Are the services different?", Review of Industrial Organization, 24: 301-324.
Baumol J. William (1959), Business Behaviour, Value and Growth, Macmillan, NewYork.
Breusch T.S. and Pagan A.R. (1979), "A Simple Test for Heteroscedasticity and Random Coefficient Variation". Econometrica, 47: 1287-1294.
Chesher A. (1979), "Testing the Law of Proportionate Effect", The Journal of Industrial Economics, 27: 403-411.
Dean T.J., Brown R.L. and Bamford C.E. (1998), "Differences in Large and Small Firm Responses to Environmental Context: Strategic Implications from a Comparative Analysis of Business Formations", Strategic Management Journal, 19: 709-728.
Durbin J. (1954), "Errors in Variables", Review of the International Statistical Institute, 22: 23-32.
Evans D.S. (1987), "The Relationship Between Firm Growth, Size and Age: Estimates for 100 Manufacturing Industries", Journal of Industrial Economics, 35: 567-582.
Gale B.T. (1972), "Market Share and Rate of Return", Review of Economics and Statistics, 54: 412-423.
Gibrat R. (1931), Les Inégalités Économiques, Paris: Librairie du Recueil Sirey.
Haines W.W. (1970), "The Profitability of Large-Size Firm", Rivista Internationale de Science Economiche e Commerciale, 17: 321-351.
Hall B.H., (1987), "The Relationship Between Firm Size and Firm Growth in the U.S. Manufacturing", Journal of Industrial Economics, 35: 583-606.
Hall M. and Weiss L. (1967), "Firm Size and Profitability", Review of Economics and Statistics, 49: 319-331.
Available Versions of this Item
- Does the Firm Size Matter? An Empirical Enquiry into the Performance of Indian Manufacturing Firms. (deposited 17. May 2009 00:22) [Currently Displayed]