Welfare effects of fiscal policy under alternative exchange rate regimes: the role of the scale variable of money demand

Pitterle, Ingo A. and Steffen, Dirk (2004): Welfare effects of fiscal policy under alternative exchange rate regimes: the role of the scale variable of money demand.

Abstract

This paper investigates the implications of alternative scale variables of money demand for the comparison of a flexible exchange rate regime with a monetary union in a New Open Economy Macroeconomics setup. The welfare evaluation of exchange rate regimes esstentially depends on the exchange rate response under the flexible regime. When the scale variable is private consumption, a domestic fiscal expansion yields a depreciation of the domestic currency. The combined expenditure switching and terms-of-trade effects are beneficial to domestic households, who thus prefer a flexible exchange rate regime. However, when the scale variable is total absorption, the domestic currency appreciates and the welfare results are reversed.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Fiscal Policy; New Open Economy Macroeconomics; Money Demand Specification; Flexible Exchange Rates; Monetary Union; Pricing-to-Market
• Subjects: F - International Economics > F4 - Macroeconomic Aspects of International Trade and Finance > F42 - International Policy Coordination and Transmission; F - International Economics > F4 - Macroeconomic Aspects of International Trade and Finance > F41 - Open Economy Macroeconomics

References

Aoki, M. (1985): “Misadjustment to Anticipated Shocks: An Example of Exchange-Rate Response,” Journal of International Money and Finance, 4, 415–420.

Bergin, P. (2004): “One Money One Price? Pricing to Market in a Monetary Union,” European Economic Review, forthcoming.

Betts, C., and M. Devereux (2000): “Exchange Rate Dynamics in a Model of Pricing-to-Market,” Journal of International Economics, 50, 215–244.

Calvo, G. (1983): “Staggered Contracts in a Utility-Maximizing Framework,” Journal of Monetary Economics, 12, 383–398.

Carlstrom, C. T., and T. S. Fuerst (2001): “Real Indeterminacy in Monetary Models with Nominal Interest Rate Distortions,” Review of Economic Dynamics, 4, 767–789.

Carre, M., and F. Collard (2003): “Monetary Union: A Welfare Based Approach,” European Economic Review, 47, 521–552.

Chang, W., and C. Lai (1997): “The Specification of Money Demand, Fiscal Policy, and Exchange Rate Dynamics,” Journal of Macroeconomics, 19(1), 79–102.

Corsetti, G., and P. Pesenti (2000): “Welfare and Macroeconomic Interdependence,” mimeo, Federal Reserve Bank.

Coutinho, L. (2003): “Fiscal Policy in the New Open Economy Macroeconomics and Prospects for Fiscal Policy Coordination,” ENEPRI Working Paper Series, 21.

Elyasiani, E., and A. Nasseh (1994): “The Appropriate Scale Variable in the U.S. Money Demand: An Application of Nonnested Tests of Consumption versus Income Measures,” Journal of Business and Economics Statistics, 12, 47–55.

Fleming, M. (1962): “Domestic Financial Policies under Fixed and under Floating Exchange Rates,” International Monetary Fund Staff Papers, 9, 369–79.

Ganelli, G. (2003): “Useful Government Spending, Direct Crowding-out and Fiscal Policy Interdependence,” Journal of International Money and Finance, forthcoming.

Ganelli, G., and P. Lane (2002): “Dynamic General Equilibrium Analysis: The Open Economy Dimension,” Trinity College Dublin and CEPR, mimeo.

Hairault, J.-O., and F. Portier (1993): “Money, New-Keynesian Macroeconomics, and the Business Cycle,” European Economic Review, 37, 1533–1568.

Helpman, E. (1981): “An Exploration of the Theory of Exchange Rate Regimes,” Journal of Political Economy, 89, 865–90.

Kollmann, R. (2001a): “The Exchange Rate in a Dynamic-Optimizing Business Cycle Model with Nominal Rigidities: A Quantitative Investigation,” Journal of International Economics, 55, 243–262.

Kollmann, R.(2001b): “Explaining international comovements of output and asset returns: The role of money and nominal rigidities,” Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control, 25, 1547–1583.

Lucas, R. E. (1980): “Equilibrium in a Pure Currency Economy,” Economic Inquiry, 18, 203–220.

Lucas, R. E. J. (1982): “Interest Rates and Currency Prices in a Two-Country World,”Journal of Monetary Economics, 10, 336–60.

Mankiw, G. (1985): “Small Menu Costs and Large Business Cycles: A Macroeconomic Model of Monopoly,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 100, 529–539.

Mankiw, G., and L. Summers (1986): “Money Demand and the Effects of Fiscal Policies,”Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 18, 415–429.

Mundell, R. (1963): “Capital Mobility and Stabilization Policy under Fixed and Flexible Exchange Rates,” Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science, 29, 475–85.

Obstfeld, M., and K. Rogoff (1995): “Exchange Rate Dynamics Redux,” Journal of Political Economy, 103, 624–660.

Pitterle, I., and D. Steffen (2004a): “Fiscal Policy in a Monetary Union Model with Home Bias in Consumption,” mimeo, University of Frankfurt.

Pitterle, I., and D. Steffen(2004b): “Spillover Effects of Fiscal Policy under Flexible Exchange Rates,”Econometric Society 2004 Australasian Meetings"

Sargent, T. J. (1987): Dynamic Macroeconomic Theory. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

Schmitt-Grohe, S., and M. Uribe (2000): “Price Level Determinacy and Monetary Policy under a Balanced-budget Requirement,” Journal of Monetary Economics, 45, 211–246.

Sriram, S. S. (2001a): “A Survey of Recent Empirical Money Demand Studies,” IMF Staff Papers, 47, 334–365.

Sriram, S. S.(2001b): “Theory of the Demand for Money: a Survey of the Literature,” The Indian Economic Journal, 49(1), 103–115.

Sutherland, A. (1996): “Exchange Rate Dynamics and Financial Market Integration,”CEPR Discussion Paper, 1337.

Thornton, D. (1988): “Should Consumer Expenditures be the Scale Variable in Empirical Money Demand Equations?,” Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Working Papers, 88-003.

Tille, C. (1999): “The Role of Consumption Substitutability in the International Transmission of Shocks,” mimeo, Federal Reserve Bank of New York.

Tille, C. (2001): “The Role of Consumption Substitutability in the International Transmission of Monetary Shocks,” Journal of International Economics, 53(2), 421–444.