Zhang, ZhongXiang (1999): Estimating the size of the potential market for all three flexibility mechanisms under the Kyoto Protocol.
Download (304kB) | Preview
The Kyoto Protocol is the first international environmental agreement that sets legally binding greenhouse gas emissions targets and timetables for Annex I countries. It incorporates emissions trading and two project-based flexibility mechanisms, namely joint implementation and the clean development mechanism to help Annex I countries to meet their Kyoto targets at a lower overall cost. This paper aims to estimate the size of the potential market for all three flexibility mechanisms under the Kyoto Protocol over the first commitment period 2008-2012, both on the demand side and on the supply side. Taking the year 2010 as representative of the first commitment period and based on the national communications from 35 Annex I countries, the paper first estimates the potential demand in the greenhouse gas offset market. We show that for most of the OECD countries excluding the EU, their Kyoto targets are stringent than they appear at first glance. Then, the paper addresses supplementarity constraints and provides a quantitative assessment of the implications of the EU proposal for concrete ceilings on the use of flexibility mechanisms for the division of abatement actions at home and abroad. Our results suggest that although the aggregate allowed acquisitions for the Annex I countries as a whole in 2010 from all three flexibility mechanisms under the two alternatives are well below 50% of the difference between the projected baseline emissions and the target in 2010, the proposed restrictions to each Annex I country vary, in some case even substantially. Finally, using the 12-region’s marginal abatement cost-based model, the paper estimates the contributions of three flexibility mechanisms to meet the total emissions reductions required of Annex I countries under the four trading scenarios, respectively. Our results clearly demonstrate that the fewer the restrictions on trading the gains from trading are greater. The gains are unevenly distributed, however, with Annex I countries that have the highest autarkic marginal abatement costs tending to benefit the most. With respect to non-Annex I countries, their net gains are highest when trading in hot air is not allowed. Because of a great deal of low-cost abatement opportunities available in the energy sectors of China and India and their sheer sizes of population, we found that the two countries account for about three-quarters of the total non-Annex I countries’ exported permits to the Annex I regions.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Estimating the size of the potential market for all three flexibility mechanisms under the Kyoto Protocol|
|Keywords:||Emissions trading; clean development mechanism; joint implementation; climate change; marginal abatement costs; Kyoto Protocol; United States; Japan; European Union; China; India|
|Subjects:||R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R1 - General Regional Economics > R13 - General Equilibrium and Welfare Economic Analysis of Regional Economies
Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q52 - Pollution Control Adoption Costs; Distributional Effects; Employment Effects
Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q4 - Energy > Q48 - Government Policy
Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q54 - Climate; Natural Disasters; Global Warming
Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q4 - Energy > Q43 - Energy and the Macroeconomy
Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q58 - Government Policy
|Depositing User:||ZhongXiang Zhang|
|Date Deposited:||31. Jan 2009 16:30|
|Last Modified:||13. Feb 2013 14:23|
Austin, D. and P. Faeth et al. (1998), Opportunities for Financing Sustainable Development via the CDM: A Discussion Draft, Presented at a Side-Event of the Fourth Conference of the Parties to the UNFCCC, 7 November, Buenos Aires.
Austria (1998), Second National Climate Report of the Austrian Federal Government, Available at: http://www.unfccc.de.
Böhringer, C. (1999), Cooling down Hot Air: A Global CGE Analysis of Post-Kyoto Carbon abatement strategies, Presented at the International Conference on Flexible Mechanisms for an Efficient Climate Policy, 27-28 July, Stuttgart.
Brooke, A., Kendrick, D. and A. Meeraus (1996), GAMS Release 2.25: A User’s Guide, GAMS Development Corporation, Washington, DC 20007.
CEC (1999), Preparing for Implementation of the Kyoto Protocol: Commission Communications to the Council and the Parliament, COM(1999)230, Commission of the European Communities (CEC), Brussels.
Edmonds, J., MacCracken, C., Sands, R. and S. Kim (1998), Unfinished Business: The Economics of the Kyoto Protocol, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Prepared for U.S. Department of Energy.
EIA (1999), International Energy Outlook 1999, Energy Information Administration (EIA), DOE/EIA-0484(99), Washington, DC.
Ellerman, A.D. and A. Decaux (1998), Analysis of Post-Kyoto CO2 Emissions Trading Using Marginal Abatement Curves, MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change, Report No. 40, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Estonia (1998), Estonian Second National Report under the United Nation’s Framework Convention on Climate Change, Available at: http://www.unfccc.de.
European Union (1999), Community Strategy on Climate Change: Council Conclusions, No. 8346/99, 18 May, Brussels.
Gielen, A. and C. Koopmans (1998), The Economic Consequences of Kyoto, CPB Report, No. 1, The Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis (CPB), The Hague, pp. 30-33.
Greece (1997), Second National Communication to the UNFCCC, Available at: http://www.unfccc.de.
Grubb, M., Vrolijk, C. and D. Brack (1999), The Kyoto Protocol: A Guide and Assessment, Earthscan, London.
Haites, E. (1998a), International Emissions Trading and Compliance with Greenhouse Gas Emissions Limitation Commitments, Margaree Consultants Inc., Toronto, Canada.
Haites, E. (1998b), Estimate of the Potential Market for Cooperative Mechanisms 2010, Margaree Consultants Inc., Toronto, Canada.
IEA (1998), World Energy Outlook 1998, International Energy Agency (IEA), Paris.
IPCC (1996), Climate Change 1995: Economic and Social Dimensions of Climate Change, Contribution of Working Group III to the Second Assessment Report of the Intergovern¬mental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
IPCC (1999), The IPCC Special Report on Emission Scenarios, Contribution of Working Group III to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovern¬mental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), Second Draft, Information Available at: http://sres.ciesin.org.
Jefferson, M. (1997), Potential Climate Change: Carbon Dioxide Emissions 1990-96, World Energy Council Journal, pp. 76-82.
Lanchbery, J. (1998), Input to the UNCTAD Study on Greenhouse Gas Emissions Trading: Defining the Principles, Modalities, Rules and Guidelines for Verification, Reporting and Accountability, Verification Technology Information Centre, London.
McKibbin, W.J., Ross, M.T., Shackleton, R. and P.J. Wilcoxen (1999), Emissions Trading, Capital Flows and the Kyoto Protocol, Presented at the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Working Group III Expert Meeting on the Economic Impacts of Annex I Mitigation Policies on non-Annex I Countries, 27-28 May, The Hague.
OECD (1999), Taking Action against Climate Change: The Kyoto Protocol, ECO/CPE/WP1(99)/6, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), Paris.
Tulpulé, V., Brown, S., Lim, J., Polidano, C., Pant, H. and B.S. Fisher (1998), An Economic Assessment of the Kyoto Protocol Using the Global Trade and Environment Model, Presented at the OECD Workshop on the Economic Modelling of Climate Change, 17-18 September, Paris.
UNFCCC (1992), The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), Available at: http://www.unfccc.de.
UNFCCC (1996), Report of the Conference of the Parties on its Second Session, Held at Geneva from 8 to 19 July 1996: Action Taken by the Conference of the Parties on its Second Session, United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), FCCC/CP/1996/15/Add.1, Bonn.
UNFCCC (1997a), Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), FCCC/CP/1997/L.7/Add.1, Bonn.
UNFCCC (1997b), Summary of the Report of the In-Depth Review of the National Communication of Russian Federation, United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), FCCC/IDR.1(SUM)/RUS, Bonn.
UNFCCC (1998a), National Communications from Parties Included in Annex I to the Convention: Second Compilation and Synthesis of Second National Communications, United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), FCCC/CP/1998/11/Add.2, Bonn.
UNFCCC (1998b), Review of the Implementation of Commitments and of other Provisions of the Convention. Activities Implemented Jointly: Review of Progress under the Pilot Phase (Decision 5/CP.1), Second Synthesis Report on Activities Implemented, United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), FCCC/CP/1998/2, Bonn.
UNFCCC (1999a), Part Two of the Report of the Conference of the Parties on its Fourth Session, Held at Buenos Aires from 2 to 14 November 1998: Action Taken by the Conference of the Parties on its Fourth Session, United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), FCCC/CP/1998/16/Add.1, Bonn.
UNFCCC (1999b), National Communications from Parties Included in Annex I to the Convention: Report on National Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory Submissions from Annex I Parties for 1990 to 1996, United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), FCCC/SBI/1999/5/Add.1, Bonn.
US Administration (1998), The Kyoto Protocol and the President’s Policies to Address Climate Change: Administration Economic Analysis, Washington, DC, July.
Van der Mensbrugghe, D. (1998), A (Preliminary) Analysis of the Kyoto Protocol: Using the OECD GREEN Model, Presented at the OECD Workshop on the Economic Modelling of Climate Change, 17-18 September, Paris.
Victor, D.G., Nakicenovic, N. and N. Victor (1998), The Kyoto Protocol Carbon Bubble: Implications for Russia, Ukraine and Emissions Trading, IR-98-094, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), Laxenburg, Austria.
Vrolijk, C. (1999), The Potential Size of the CDM, Greenhouse Gas Emissions Trader, No. 6, UNCTAD, Geneva, pp. 2-4.
VROM (1998), Update of the Second Netherlands’ National Communication on Climate Change Policies, Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment (VROM), The Hague, May.