Stöwhase, Sven (2009): Pareto-Inefficiencies in Intrahousehold-Decision-Making: Empirical evidence from Germany.
Download (114kB) | Preview
The present paper offers empirical evidence for pareto-inefficiencies within German households. Using a large dataset from the German income tax statistic and conducting microsimulation analysis it refutes the assumption of pareto-efficiencies underlying the unitary as well as cooperative bargaining models of the household. The analysis is based on the unique features of the German source tax on wage income which give married couples some degree of freedom when determining their total tax liability and its distribution among spouses. We interpret distributive choices that do not minimize total tax withholding as the outcome of ineffiencient intra-family bargaining. Our result supports the findings of previous empirical work for developing countries and call for a reconsideration of the dominant models on intrahousehold-decision-making.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Pareto-Inefficiencies in Intrahousehold-Decision-Making: Empirical evidence from Germany|
|Keywords:||Household bargaining models; Withholding taxes; Empirics; Microsimulation|
|Subjects:||D - Microeconomics > D3 - Distribution > D31 - Personal Income, Wealth, and Their Distributions
H - Public Economics > H3 - Fiscal Policies and Behavior of Economic Agents > H31 - Household
H - Public Economics > H2 - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue > H24 - Personal Income and Other Nonbusiness Taxes and Subsidies
D - Microeconomics > D1 - Household Behavior and Family Economics > D10 - General
|Depositing User:||Sven Stöwhase|
|Date Deposited:||03. Feb 2009 14:43|
|Last Modified:||12. Feb 2013 20:45|
Akresh, Richard (2007), “(In)Efficiency in Intrahousehold Allocations”, Unpublished Manuscript, Urbana Champaign.
Attanasio, Orazio and Lechene, Valerie (2002), “Tests of Income Pooling in Household Decisions”, Review of Economic Dynamics, 5 (4), 720-748.
Becker, Gary S. (1991), “Treatise on the Family”, Harvard University Press.
Browning, Martin, Bourguignon, Francois, Chiappori, Pierre-André and Lechene, Valerie (1994) “Income and Outcomes: A Structural Model of Intrahousehold Allocation”, Journal of Political Economy, 102 (6), 1067-1096.
Browning, Martin and Chiappori, Pierre-André (1998), “Efficient Intra-Household Allocations: A General Characterization and Empirical Tests”, Econometrica, 66 (6), 1241-1278.
Bourguignon, Francois, Browning, Martin, Chiappori, Pierre-André and Lechene, Valerie (1993), “Intrahousehold Allocation of Consumption: A Model and Some Evidence from French Data”, Annales d’Economie et de Statistique, 29, 137-156.
Chiappori, Pierre-André (1988), “Rational household labor supply”, Econometrica, 56 (1), 63-89.
Chiappori, Pierre-André (1992), “Collective labor supply and welfare”, Journal of Political Economy, 100 (3), 437-467.
Dercon, Stefan and Krishnan, Pramila (2000), “In Sickness and in Health:Risk-Sharing within Households in Rural Ethiopia”, Journal of Political Economy, 108(4), 688-727.
Djebarri, Habiba (2005), “The Impact on Nutrition of the Intrahousehold Distribution of Power”, IZA Discusion Paper No. 1701.
Duflo, Esther and Udry, Christopher (2004), “Intrahousehold Resource Allocation in Côte d’Ivoire: Social Norms, Separate Accounts and Consumption Choices.”, NBER Working Paper No. 10498.
Kooreman, Peter and Kapteyn, Arie (1990), “On the empirical implementation of some game theoretic models of household labor supply”, Journal of Human Resources, 25 (4), 584-598.
Lundberg, Shelley and Pollak, Robert A. (1993), “Separate Spheres Bargaining and the Marriage Market”, Journal of Political Economy, 101 (6), 988-1010.
Lundberg, Shelley, Pollak, Robert A. and Wales, Terence J. (1997), “Do husbands and wives pool their resources? Evidence from the United Kingdom child benefit”, Journal of Human Resources, 32 (3), 463-480.
Manser, Marilyn and Brown, Murray (1980), “Marriage and household decision-making: A bargaining analysis”, International Economic Review, 21 (1), 31-44.
Modigliani, Franco and Brumberg, Richard (1954), “Utility Analysis and the Consumption Function: An Interpretation of Cross-section Data”, in: Kurihaara, Kenneth (ed.): Post-Keynsian Economics, New Brunswick.
Romich, Jennifer and Weisner, Thomas (2000), “How Families View and Use the EITC: Advance Payment versus Lump Sum Delivery”, National Tax Journal, 53 (4), 1245-1266.
Shapiro, Matthew D. and Slemrod, Joel (1995), “Consumer response to the timing of income: Evidence from a change in tax withholding”, American Economic Review, 85 (1), 274-283.
Thaler, Richard and Shefrin, Hersh (1981), “An Economic Theory of Self Control”, Journal of Political Economy, 89 (2), 392-406.
Tiefenthaler, Jill (1999) “The Sectoral Labor Supply of Married Couples in Brazil: Testing the Unitary Model of Household Behavior”, Journal of Population Economics, 12 (4), 591-606.
Torgler, Benno (2003), “Does culture matter? Tax Moral in an East-West-German comparison”, FinanzArchiv, 59 (4), 504-528.
Udry, Christopher (1996), “Gender, Agricultural Production, and the Theory of the Household”, Journal of Political Economy, 104(5), 1010-1046.
Udry, Christopher, Hoddinott, John, Alderman, Harold and Haddad, Lawrence (1995), “Gender differentials in Farm Productivity: Implications for Household Efficiency and Agricultural Policy”, Food Policy, 20(5), 407-423.