Zhang, ZhongXiang (2004): Towards an effective implementation of clean development mechanism projects in China.
Download (146kB) | Preview
With the already huge and growing amount of greenhouse gas emissions and a great deal of low-cost abatement options available, China is widely expected as the world’s number one host country of clean development mechanism (CDM) projects. But, making this potential a reality represents a significant challenge for China, because there has been a general lack of awareness by both the Chinese government and business communities, clear institutional structure, and implementation strategy. This has raised great concern about China’s ability to compete internationally for CDM projects and exploit fully its CDM potential.
This paper aims to address how CDM projects will be effectively implemented in China by examining the major CDM capacity building projects in China with bilateral and multilateral donors, the treatment of low-cost, non-priority CDM projects, and how a system for application, approval and implementation of CDM projects is set up in China and what roles the main institutional actors are going to play in the system. We conclude that these capacity building assistances, the establishment of streamlined and transparent CDM procedures and sound governance, and the lessons learned and experience gained from the implementation of the CDM project in Inner Mongolia and the two Prototype Carbon Fund (PCF)’ projects will help China to take advantage of CDM opportunities. Moreover, in order to further capitalize on its CDM potential, there is a pressing need for the Chinese government to amend its current interim CDM regulations, in particular those controversial provisions on the eligibility to participate in CDM projects in China and the distribution of the revenues derived from CDM project between the project developer and the Chinese government. We believe that taking these capacity building projects and the recommended actions to clearly define the sustainable development objective of the CDM and disseminate CDM knowledge to local authorities and project developers as sectorally and geographically wide as possible, addressing those controversial CDM provisions with clearer guidance, and gaining experience from real practice will reduce the perceived project risks and lower the barriers to CDM project development in China. This is, in turn, likely to lead a much greater percentage of carbon credits to come from CDM projects in China over the next several years.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Towards an effective implementation of clean development mechanism projects in China|
|Keywords:||Clean development mechanism; Capacity building; Charge/tax scheme; China; Price of CERs; Sustainable development|
|Subjects:||Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q52 - Pollution Control Adoption Costs; Distributional Effects; Employment Effects
Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q4 - Energy > Q48 - Government Policy
Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q4 - Energy > Q42 - Alternative Energy Sources
Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q54 - Climate; Natural Disasters; Global Warming
Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q58 - Government Policy
|Depositing User:||ZhongXiang Zhang|
|Date Deposited:||04. Feb 2009 00:27|
|Last Modified:||12. Feb 2013 14:42|
Asian Development Bank (ADB, 2002), Technical Assistance to the People’s Republic of China for Opportunities for the Clean Development Mechanism in the Energy Sector, TAR: PRC 35429, March, Manila.
CDM Executive Board (2004), Project Design Document Form for Huitengxile Windfarm Project in China (Project 0064) – Version 02, September, Available at: http://cdm.unfccc.int/UserManagement/FileStorage/FS_920755771.
Gao, G.S. and Li, L.Y. (2003), Implementation and Management of the CDM, Energy of China, Vol. 25, No. 6, pp. 11-16.
Joint Implementation Quarterly (JIQ, 2003), CERUPT First Round Concluded, JIQ, Vol. 9, No. 1, p. 2.
Joint Implementation Quarterly (JIQ, 2005), CDM Methodologies Approved by the CDM Executive Board, JIQ, Vol. 11, No. 2, p.14.
Lecocq, F. and K. Capoor (2003), State and Trends of the Carbon Market 2003, December 1, Prototype Carbon Fund, The World Bank, Washington, DC.
Lecocq, F. and K. Capoor (2005), State and Trends of the Carbon Market 2005, May, Carbon Finance Business, The World Bank, Washington, DC.
Li, L. (2001), Sino-Dutch Co-op Enters New Era, China Daily, April 21, Beijing.
Lin, W., Heggelund, G., Tangen, K. and J. Li (2004), Efficient Implementation of CDM in China, Report Prepared for the Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, February 5, Beijing.
Lu, X.D. (2004), Clean Development Mechanism: An Update, PowerPoint Presentation at Energy Research Institute, the National Development and Reform Commission, January 16, Beijing.
Senter Internationaal (2001), Terms of Reference: CERUPT 2001, November 1, The Hague, Available at: http://www.senter.nl/sites/erupt/contents/i000008/tor_cerupt2001.doc.
Sun, C.H. (2003), Clean Development Mechanism – International Rules and China’s Activities, PowerPoint Presentation at Canada-China Workshop on the CDM in China, September 3, Beijing.
The Government of the People’s Republic of China and United Nations Development Program (The Government of the PRC and UNDP, 2003), Building Capacity for the Clean Development Mechanism in China, CPR/01/H02.
Tsinghua University (2003), The Study on the Methodologies and its Application of Clean Development Mechanism in China, Draft Final Report Prepared for the World Bank, November, Beijing.
Werksman, J. (1999), Greenhouse Gas Emissions Trading and the WTO, Review of European Community and International Environmental Law, Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 251-264.
World Bank (2004), Clean Development Mechanism: Thinking a Proactive and Sustainable Approach, June, Washington, DC.
Zhang, Z.X. (1999), Estimating the Size of the Potential Market for All Three Flexibility Mechanisms under the Kyoto Protocol, Prepared for the Asian Development Bank under Contract TA-5592-REG, Faculty of Law and Faculty of Economics, University of Groningen, The Netherlands.
Zhang, Z.X. (2000), Estimating the Size of the Potential Market for the Kyoto Flexibility Mechanisms, Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv - Review of World Economics, Vol. 136, No. 3, pp. 491-521.
Zhang, Z.X. (2001), An Assessment of the EU Proposal for Ceilings on the Use of Kyoto Flexibility Mechanisms, Ecological Economics, Vol. 37, No. 1, pp. 53-69.
Zhang, Z.X. (2004a), Meeting the Kyoto Targets: The Importance of Developing Country Participation, Journal of Policy Modeling, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp. 3-19.
Zhang, Z.X. (2004b), Report on the International Conference on Climate Policy after Marrakech: Towards Global Participation, Honolulu, Hawaii, 4-6 September 2003, Prepared for the Dutch Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environ¬ment, the Japanese Ministry of the Environment, Industrial Technology Research Institute (Hsinchu, Taiwan), and Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (Kanagawa, Japan), 86 pp, Available at: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=534163.
Zhang, Z.X. (2006), The World Bank’s Prototype Carbon Fund and China, Journal of Energy and Development, Vol. 31, No. 2, pp. 157-171.