Munich Personal RePEc Archive
Login | Create Account

Small-scale technologies for energy innovations: role and implication directions

Knol, W.H.C. (2005): Small-scale technologies for energy innovations: role and implication directions. Published in:

[img]
Preview
PDF - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
115Kb

Abstract

Energy innovations with sustainable fundamentals are needed to fulfill energy demands for the coming decades. This leads to a seeking process for new knowledge and technologies in order to create incremental and breakthrough energy innovations. The question is what the role is of small-scale technologies (nanotechnologies) for these innovations? This paper examines in a brief and non-exhaustive manor the role and implication directions of small-scale technologies for energy innovations. First, the paper describes the necessity for energy innovations and small-scale technologies. Next, based on examples role and implication directions are discussed. The conclusion focuses on the outline presented.

Item Type:MPRA Paper
Institution:Qeam
Language:English
Subjects:Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q4 - Energy > Q40 - General
O - Economic Development, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Technological Change; Research and Development > O33 - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences; Diffusion Processes
L - Industrial Organization > L0 - General > L00 - General
ID Code:1325
Deposited By:Erik Knol
Deposited On:04. Jan 2007
Last Modified:07. Nov 2007 01:41
References:

Arnall. A.H. (2003), Future technologies, today’s choices: nanotechnology, artificial intelligence and robotics; a technical, political and institutional map of emerging technologies. Research report of Greenpeace Environmental Trust, London.

Bainbridge, W.S. (2002), Public attitudes toward nanotechnology, Journal of Nanoparticle Research, Vol. 4, pp. 561-570.

Brabec, C.J., Sariciftci, N.S. & Hummelen, J.C. (2001), Plastic solar cells. Advanced Functional Materials, Vol. 11(1), pp. 15-26.

Callon, M, Laredo, P. & Rabehariso, V. (1992), The management and evaluation of technological programs and the dynamics of techno-economic networks: the case to the AFME. Research Policy, Vol. 21, pp. 215-236.

Dosi, G. (1982), Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: a suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change. Research Policy, Vol. 11, pp. 147-162.

ETC Group (2004), Nanotech news in living coulor: an update on white papers, red flags, green goo, grey goo (and Red Herrings). Communiqué of the ETC groep, issue 85, May / June 2004.

European Commission (2004), Nanotechnology: innovation for tomorrow’s world. Report of DG Research, Brussels.

Hawken, P., Lovins, A.B. & Lovins, L.H. (1999), Natural capitalism: the next industrial revolution. Earthscan Publications Ltd.

Knol, W.H.C. (2004), Nanotechnology and business opportunities: scenarios as awareness instrument. Paper published in the proceedings of the 12th international conference ‘High Technology Small Firms’, Enschede, May 24-25, pp. 609-621.

Köhler, Th., Mietke, S., Ilgner, J. & Werner, M. (2003), Nanotechnology - market & trends. Vakuum in Forschung und Praxis, Vol. 15(6), pp. 292-297.

Millet, S.M. (1988), How scenarios trigger strategic thinking. Long Range Planning, Vol. 21(5), pp. 61-68.

Murphy, V., Volpe, A.F., Weinberg, W.H. (2003), High-throughput approaches to catalyst discovery. Current Opinion in Chemical Biology, Vol. 7(3), pp. 427-433.

Nolan, P., Shipman, A. & Rui, H. (2004), Coal liquefaction, Shenhua Group, and China’s energy security. European Management Journal, Vol. 22 (2), pp 150-164.

Nunzi, J.M. (2002), Organic photovoltaic materials and devices. C. R. Physique, Vol. 3, pp. 523-542.

Parayil, G. (1993), Models of technological change: a critical review of current knowledge. History and Technology, Vol. 10, pp. 105-126.

Rifkin, J. (2002), The hydrogen economy: the creation of the worldwide energy web and the redistribution of power on earth. Jeremy P. Tarcher / Putman, New York.

Roco, M.C. (1999), Nanoparticles and nanotechnology research. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, Vol. 1, pp. 1-6.

Roco, M.C. (2003), Broader societal issues of nanotechnology, Journal of Nanoparticle Research, Vol. 5, pp. 181-189.

Rogers, E.M. (1995), Diffusion of innovations. The Free Press, New York.

Royal Society (2004), Nanoscience and nanotechnologies: opportunities and uncertainties. Research report of The Royal Society, London, July 2004.

Spanggaard, H. & Krebs, F.C. (2004), A brief history of the development of organic and polymeric photovoltaics. Solar Energy Materials & Solar Cells, Vol. 83, pp. 125-146.

Walsh, S.T. (2004), Roadmapping a disruptive technology: a case study; the emerging icrosystems and top-down nanosystems industry. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, Vol. 71, pp. 161-185.

WBCSD (2004), Energy and climate change: facts and trends to 2050. Report of World Business Council for Sustainable Development, August 2004.

Veen, A.C. van, Farrusseng, D. Rebeilleau, M, Decamp, T., Holzwarth, A. Schuurman, Y. & Mirodatos, C. (2003), Acceleration in catalyst development by fast transient kinetic investigation. Journal of Catalysis, Vol. 216, pp. 135-143.

Wood, S., Jones, R., & Geldart, A. (2003), The social and economic challenges of nanotechnology. Report of Economic and Social Research Council, Swindon.

All papers reproduced by permission. Reproduction and distribution subject to the approval of the copyright owners.
Repository Staff Only: item control page

LMU-Logo
MPRA is a RePEc service hosted by
the Munich University Library in Germany.