Longitudinal Poverty and Income Inequality A Comparative Panel Study for The Netherlands, Germany and the UK

Muffels, Ruud; Fouarge, Didier and Dekker, Ronald (2000): Longitudinal Poverty and Income Inequality A Comparative Panel Study for The Netherlands, Germany and the UK. Unpublished.

Abstract

The increasing availability of longitudinal data on income in Europe greatly facilitates the analysis of income and poverty dynamics. In this paper, the results of longitudinal data analyses on income and poverty in three European welfare states are reported. Using panel data for Germany, the Netherlands and the UK a variety of longitudinal inequality and poverty measures have been applied to reveal these dynamics. The focus will be on so-called poverty profiles indicating whether people belong to the permanent poor, the transient poor, the recurrent poor or the never poor. Multinomial regression models are estimated that aim to explain the likelihood of belonging to each of the poverty profiles over time and on the events that trigger the belonging to the poverty profiles over time. Our results show that there is a great deal of economic mobility in and out of poverty over time. Most of the poor are only poor for a short period of time but, nevertheless, a substantial part of the population is found to be persistent poor. This is particularly the case in the UK. In matured welfare states, income mobility and persistency of poverty are co-occurring. Our analysis of poverty profiles shows that especially labour market events trigger the belonging to the persistent, the recurrent or the transient poor.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: income dynamics; poverty; comparative analysis; welfare states; panel data, multinomial logit models
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D3 - Distribution > D31 - Personal Income, Wealth, and Their Distributions; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C2 - Econometric Methods: Single Equation Models; Single Variables > C23 - Models with Panel Data; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C3 - Econometric Methods: Multiple; Simultaneous Equation Models; Multiple Variables; Endogenous Regressors > C35 - Discrete Regression and Qualitative Choice Models; Discrete Regressors; I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I3 - Welfare and Poverty > I32 - Measurement and Analysis of Poverty

References

Atkinson, A.B. (1987). ‘On the Measurement of Poverty’, Econometrica, 55 (4), 749-764.

Atkinson, A.B., Rainwater, L. & Smeeding, T.M. (1995). Income Distribution in OECD Countries, Paris: OECD.

Berghman, J. (1995). ‘Social exclusion in Europe: policy context and analytical framework’. In G. Room (ed.). Beyond the threshold: the measurement and analysis of social exclusion. Bristol: The Policy Press.

Callan. T., Nolan, B., Whelan, C. & Williams, J. (1996). Poverty in the 1990’s. evidence from the 1994 living in Ireland survey. ESRI-Dublin. Oak Tree Press. Dublin.

Dirven, H-J., Fouarge, D., & Muffels, R. (1998). ‘Poverty in the Netherlands’. In: J.Dixon & D. Macarov (eds.). Poverty: a persistent global reality. London: Routledge.

Duncan. G. & W. Rodgers (1991). “Has children’s poverty become more persistent?”. American Sociological Review. 56: 538-550.

Fouarge, D. & R. Muffels (2000). ‘Model-based estimates of longitudinal poverty for the Netherlands, Germany and the UK’. Paper for the 14th Annual Conference of the European Society for Population Economics, Bonn 15-17 june 2000.

Headey, B., Goodin, R.E., Muffels, R. & Dirven, H-J. (1997). ‘Welfare over time: three worlds of welfare capitalism in panel perspective’, Journal of Public Policy, 17, 329-59.

Headey, B., R. Muffels, R. Goodin & H.-J. Dirven (2000), Is There a Trade-Off Between Economic Efficiency and a Generous Welfare State? A Comparison of Best Cases of 'The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism'. Journal of Social Indicators Research, Vol. 50, 2, pp. 115-157.

Jarvis, S. and Jenkins, S.P. (1998). Derived Net Income Variables for BHPS Waves 1-6. Economic and Social Research Council, Research Centre on Micro-Social Change, University of Essex: The Data Archive, Colchester.

Kakwani, N. (1986). Analysing Redistribution Policies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lillard. L & R. Willis (1978). “Dynamic aspects of earnings mobility”. Econometrica. 46(5): 985-1012.

Mitchell, D. (1991). Income Transfers in Ten Welfare States. Aldershot: Avebury.

Muffels, R.JA. (1993). Welfare Economic Effects of Social Security. Essays on Poverty, Social Security and Labor Markets: Evidence from Panel Data .. Series on Social Security Studies, Report No. 21. Tilburg, Netherlands: Tilburg University.

Ringen, S. (1988). ‘Direct and Indirect Measures of Poverty’, Journal of Social Policy, 17(3), 351-365. Sen, A. (1979). ‘Issues in the Measurement of Poverty’, Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 81, 285-307.

Smeeding, T.M., Saunders, P., Coder, J., Jenkins, S., Fritzell, J., Hagenaars, A.J.M. & Wolfson, M. (1993). ‘Poverty, inequality and family living standards across seven nations: the effect of non-cash subsidies for health, education and housing’. Review of Income and Wealth , 39, 229-56.

Walker, R. (1994). Poverty Dynamics: Issues and Examples. Avebury, Aldershot, ISBN 185628 929 X.