Pemekaran Daerah di Papua: Kesejahteraan Masyarakat vs. Kepentingan Elit

Aloysius Gunadi, Brata (2008): Pemekaran Daerah di Papua: Kesejahteraan Masyarakat vs. Kepentingan Elit. Unpublished.

Abstract

Number of regions in Papua have increased significantly as a result of the creation of new sub-national administration or pemekaran. There were 36 regions (kabupaten/kota) in this island; meanwhile in 1996 there were only 13 regions. There are several controversies regarding to pemekaran in Papua. The aim of this article is to discuss two main issues: social welfare of Papuans and actors behind pemekaran. For this purposes, this article mainly used secondary data that collected from various sources such as the Indonesia Human Development Report.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: Indonesian
• Keywords: pemekaran, social welfare, elite’s interest, Papua
• Subjects: O - Economic Development, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development; H - Public Economics > H7 - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations > H70 - General; R - Urban, Rural, and Regional Economics > R1 - General Regional Economics > R11 - Regional Economic Activity: Growth, Development, and Changes

References

Aloysius Gunadi Brata (2007), ‘Konsolidasi Daerah dan Pelayanan Publik’, makalah pada Seminar Internasional Ke Delapan Dinamika Politik Lokal Di Indonesia: “Penataan Daerah (Territorial Reform) dan Dinamikanya”, Yayasan Percik-Ford Foundation, Salatiga, 17-19 Juli 2007

Aloysius Gunadi Brata (2008), “Creating New Regions, Improving Regional Welfare Equality?”, makalah pada the Indonesian Regional Science Association Ninth International Conference: ”The Current and Future Issues of Regional Development, Energy and Climate Change”, Palembang, 31 Juli – 1 Agustus 2008.

Aryo Wisangheni G dan Andy Riza Hidayat (2007), “Dimekarkan Malah Makin Melorot…”, Kompas 10 Maret 2007.

BPS-BAPPENAS-UNDP (2004), Indonesian Human Development Report 2004.

Fitria Fitrani, Bert Hofman, Kai Kaiser (2005). ‘Unity in Diversity? The Creation of New Local Governments in a Decentralizing Indonesia’, Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies 41 (1): 57-79.

Henk Schulte Nordhold dan Gerry van Klinken (2007), ‘Pendahuluan’, dalam Henk Schulte Nordhold dan Gerry van Klinken (eds.), Politik Lokal di Indonesia, Yayasan Obor Indonesia, Jakarta, hal. 1-41.

Hedman, Eva-Lotta E (2007), ‘Papua: the last frontier for democratization, demilitarization and decentralization in Indonesia’, dalam Eva-Lotta E. Hedman (ed.), Dynamics of Conflict and Displacement in Papua, Indonesia, Refugee Studies Centre Working Paper No. 42, Departement of International Development, University of Oxford, September 2007.

Jaap Timmer (2007), “Desentralisasi Salah Kaprah dan Politik Elit di Papua”, dalam Henk Schulte Nordhold dan Gerry van Klinken (eds.), Politik Lokal di Indonesia, Yayasan Obor Indonesia, Jakarta, hal. 595-625.

Muridan Widjojo (2008a), “Pemekaran demi Keutuhan NKRI?” (http://muridan-papua.blogspot.com/2008/02/pemekaran-demi-keutuhan-nkri-bagian-1.html).

Syarif Hidayat (2007), “Shadow State…? Bisnis dan Politik di Propinsi Banten”, dalam Henk Schulte Nordhold dan Gerry van Klinken (eds.), Politik Lokal di Indonesia, Yayasan Obor Indonesia, Jakarta, hal. 267-303.

USAID-DRSP (2006), Stock Taking on Indonesia’s Recent Decentralization Reforms-Main Report, diakses 21/5/2007 from <http://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/PNADH312.pdf>

Yermias Ignatius Degei (2007), “Otonomi Khusus vs Pemekaran di Papua” (http://suarapembaca.detik.com/index.php/home.read/tahun/2007/bulan/06/tgl/04/time/161241/idnews/788935/idkanal/471).

Walhamri Wahid (2007), “Freeport Masa lalu, LNG Tangguh Masa Sekarang, Mamberamo Masa Depan Papua” (sarmikab.go.id/page_info.php?id_brt=49&id_ktgbr=22)