Jonung, Lars (2004): To be or not to be in the euro? Benefits and costs of monetary unification as perceived by voters in the Swedish euro referendum 2003. Published in: The Cato Journal , Vol. 24, No. numbers 1-2 (2004): pp. 123-149.
Download (442Kb) | Preview
The Swedish referendum in September 2003 on adopting the euro or keeping the domestic currency, the krona, represents a unique event to examine the public’s perceptions of the benefits and costs of monetary unification. The voters chose between the two polar cases of exchange rate regimes: either a freely floating exchange rate or membership in a monetary union. Three major conclusions emerge from the analysis of the exit poll surveys gathered on the day of the referendum. First, the optimum currency area theory proves to be a constructive framework to predict voting behaviour across socio-economic groups and regions in Sweden, assuming voters behave in their self-interest. Second, the distribution of the expected benefits and costs across groups was a major determinant of their voting behavior. As predicted by theory, the Yes-vote was strongest among voters employed in the tradable sector, in high growth regions as well as among high-income earners and well educated. The No-vote was strongest among voters employed in the non-tradable sector, in particular in the public sector, and among low-income earners, the unemployed and the less educated – in short, among groups dependent on public-sector transfers to maintain their living standards in the event of adverse economic shocks. Third, political attitudes towards the European integration process heavily influenced the views of the voters towards the euro.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Institution:||DG ECFIN, European Commission, Brussels|
|Original Title:||To be or not to be in the euro? Benefits and costs of monetary unification as perceived by voters in the Swedish euro referendum 2003|
|Keywords:||Euro; optimum currency area; exchange rate regime; voting; referendum; Sweden|
|Subjects:||H - Public Economics > H1 - Structure and Scope of Government > H11 - Structure, Scope, and Performance of Government
F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F15 - Economic Integration
F - International Economics > F3 - International Finance > F33 - International Monetary Arrangements and Institutions
E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E6 - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, Macroeconomic Policy, and General Outlook > E60 - General
|Depositing User:||Lars Jonung|
|Date Deposited:||06. Jan 2007|
|Last Modified:||12. Feb 2013 10:46|
Artis, M., (2003), “Reflections on the optimal currency area (OCA) criteria in the light of EMU”, pp. 297-307, International Journal of Finance and Economics.
Bordo, M.D. and L. Jonung, (2003),"The future of EMU: what does the history of monetary unions tell us?”, chapter 3 in Capie, F. and G. Wood, eds., Monetary unions. Theory, history, public choice, Routledge, London.
Broz, L. and J. Frieden, (2001), “The political economy of international monetary relations”, pp. 317-43, Annual Review Political Science.
Calmfors, L., et al., (1997), EMU – A Swedish Perspective, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston.
Carlson, B. and L. Jonung, (2004), “How did the great Swedish economists look at their role in public debate? The views of Knut Wicksell, Gustav Cassel, Eli Heckscher, Bertil Ohlin and Gunnar Myrdal,” forthcoming in Bellet, M., S. Gloria-Palermo and A. Zouache, eds., Evolution of the market process. Austrian and Swedish economics, Routledge.
Cohen, B., (1998), The geography of money, Cornell University Press, Itacha and London.
Doyle, O. and J. Fidrmuc (2003), “Who is in favour of enlargement? Determinants of support for EU membership in the candidate countries’ referenda”, prepared for the ZEI/WDI conference on Political Economy of Transition: Job Creation and Job Destruction, ZEI, Bonn, August 2003. CEPR Discussion Paper No. 4273, February 2004.
Eichengreen, B., (1995), “The endogeneity of exchange-rate regimes”, Chapter 1 in Kenen, P. ed., Understanding interdependence. The macroeconomics of the open economy, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Eichengreen, B. and J. Frieden, (2001), “The political economy of the European monetary unification. An analytical introduction”, Chapter 1 in Eichengreen, B. and J. Frieden, eds., The political economy of European monetary unification, Westview Press, Boulder.
Eichengreen, B. and D. Leblang, (2003), “Exchange rates and cohesion: Historical perspectives and political-economy considerations”, pp. 797-822, Journal of Common Market Studies.
Fischer, S., (2001), “Distinguished Lecture on Economics in Government – Exchange rate regimes: Is the bipolar view correct?”, pp. 3-24, Journal of Economic Perspectives.
Frieden, J., (1994), “Exchange rate politics: contemporary lessons from American history”, pp. 81-103, Review of International Political Economy.
Gabel, M., (2001), “Divided opinion, common currency: The political economy of public support for EMU”, Chapter 3 in Eichengreen, B. and J. Frieden, eds., The political economy of European monetary unification, Westview Press, Boulder.
Giovannini, A., (1993), “Economic and monetary union: what happened? Exploring the political dimension of optimum currency areas”, Chapter 4 in The monetary future of Europe, CEPR, London.
Goodhart, C., (1995), "The Political Economy of Monetary Union", Chapter 12 in Kenen, P., ed., Understanding interdependence. The macroeconomics of the open economy, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Hernborn, H., S. Holmberg, P. Näsman and T. Thedéen, (2002), Valu. Swedish exit polls, Sveriges Television, Stockholm.
Holmberg, S., (2003), “EMU-folkomröstningen 2003. Valu-siffror”, mimeo, Sveriges Television, Stockholm.
Jensen, A.T., M. Gilljam and P. Personen, (1998), “The citizens, the referendums and the European Union”, Chapter 14 in Jensen, A.T., P. Personen and M. Gilljam, eds., To join or not to join. Three Nordic referendums on membership in the European Union, Scandinavian University Press, Oslo.
Jonung, L., (2002), “National or international inflation targeting. The Wicksellian dilemma of the Euro-outs”, pp. 183-97, Journal of Public Policy.
Marcussen, M. and M. Zölner, (2003), “Monetarism and the masses. Denmark and economic integration in Europe”, pp. 101-23, Cooperation and Conflict: Journal of the Nordic International Studies Association.
Meon, P-G., (2002), “Distributive consequences of a monetary union: What can we learn from a referendum?”, pp. 581-84, Applied Economics Letters.
Mongelli, F. P., (2002), “‘New’ Views on the Optimum Currency Area Theory: What is EMU telling us?”, Working Paper No. 138, European Central Bank, Frankfurt am Main.
Mundell, R., (1961), “A theory of optimum currency areas”, pp. 657-65, American Economic Review.
Stråth, B., (2000), “Poverty, Neutrality and Welfare: Three concepts in the modern foundation myth of Sweden”, Chapter 20 in Stråth, B., ed., Myth and memory in the construction of community. Historical patterns in Europe and beyond, Presses interuniversitaires européennes-Peter Lang, Brussels.
Vlachos, J., (2004), “Who wants political integration? Evidence from the Swedish EU-membership referendum”, pp. 1589-1604, Journal of Public Economics.
Östergård, U., (1994), “Nation-Building Danish Style”, in Sörensen, Ö., ed., Nordic paths to national identity in the nineteenth century, The Research Council of Norway, Oslo.