Munich Personal RePEc Archive

Tort Reform, Disputes and Belief Formation

Landeo, Claudia M. (2009): Tort Reform, Disputes and Belief Formation.

[img]
Preview
PDF
MPRA_paper_13453.pdf

Download (269Kb) | Preview

Abstract

We experimentally study the effects of the split-award tort reform, where the state takes a share of the plaintiff's punitive damage award, on litigants' beliefs and bargaining outcomes. In addition, we study the formation of litigants' beliefs in a strategic environment. Our results provide support for coherence-based reasoning theories: coherence shifts in litigants' background beliefs (elicited before a role is assigned and after commitment to a choice at the pretrial bargaining stage) suggest bi-directionality between choices and beliefs. Our findings also suggest role-specific bias in the updating of plaintiffs' beliefs about firm's negligence. Finally, our findings indicate that split-awards affect plaintiffs' beliefs about fairness and lower out-of-court settlement amounts.

UB_LMU-Logo
MPRA is a RePEc service hosted by
the Munich University Library in Germany.