Freeman, Alan (2009): What makes the US Profit Rate Fall?
Download (207Kb) | Preview
Since world war II there have been two quite distinct phases of world growth. In about 1965, a long slowdown set in which has still not ended. Robert Brenner (2002, 2003) has re-ignited the debate about its causes, claiming that nothing in either present or past economic theory explains it. He argues for a ‘third explanation’, alternative both to the profit-share hypothesis which dominates today, and the rising output-capital ratio account associated with Marx and Kalecki.
Empirically, the evidence overwhelmingly shows the output-capital ratio is a dominant cause of postwar movements in the US profit rate; thus what Brenner maintains is theoretically impossible, is empirically true. The paper dissects this contradiction which, if economics proceeded scientifically, would lead to a radical critique of its own paradigm, but has instead led it to suppress and ignore the only coherent alternative.
The paper shows Brenner’s rejection of the Marx-Kalecki framework arises because his theoretical paradigm, adapted uncritically from his critics, cannot allow for the effect of falling prices on capital stocks. His own ‘third explanation’ is incompatible with this same framework and can be sustained only by understanding it as the mechanism behind, or ultimate cause of, the movement of the output-capital ratio in price terms.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||What makes the US Profit Rate Fall?|
|Keywords:||crisis, inequality, Brenner, Value, profit rate, long waves, world systems, TSSI, temporalism|
|Subjects:||B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B5 - Current Heterodox Approaches > B51 - Socialist; Marxian; Sraffian
E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E3 - Prices, Business Fluctuations, and Cycles > E32 - Business Fluctuations; Cycles
O - Economic Development, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Technological Change; Research and Development; Intellectual Property Rights > O30 - General
B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B4 - Economic Methodology
|Depositing User:||Alan Freeman|
|Date Deposited:||19. Mar 2009 05:32|
|Last Modified:||11. Feb 2013 18:01|
Armstrong, P., Glyn, A., & Harrison, J. (1984). Capitalism since World War II: The making and breakup of the great boom. London: Fontana.
Brenner R (2002). ‘Competition and profitability: a reply to Ajit Zacharias’in Review of Radical Political Economics 34,pp35-44. New York:North-Holland.
Day, RB.(1981) The Crisis and the Crash: Soviet Studies of the West (1917-1939). London: NLB
Dumenil, G and Dominique Levy(1993), The economics of the profit rate: competition, crises, and historical tendencies in capitalism. Aldershot and Vermont: Edward Elgar
Freeman, A. and Guglielmo Carchedi (1995) (eds) Marx and Non-Equilibrium Economics. London and Aldershot: Edward Elgar
Freeman, A., Andrew Kliman and Julian Wells (2004)(eds) The New Value Controversy in Economics. London and Aldershot: Edward Elgar
Glyn, A and R.B. Sutcliffe(1972) British capitalism, workers and the profits squeeze. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Johnman, L. and Hugh Murphy (2002), British Shipbuilding and the State since 1918: a Political Economy of Decline, Ithaca: Regatta Press
Maddison, A (1982), Phases of Capitalist Development, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
Maddison, A (1995) , Monitoring the World Economy: 1820-1992. Development Centre Studies. Paris and Washington, DC: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
Mandel, E. (1974) The Second Slump. London: Verso.
Okishio, N. (1961). “Technical Change and the Rate of Profit,” Kobe University Economic Review, no.7: 86-99.
Roemer, J. (1978a) ‘Technical Change and the “Tendency of the Rate of Profit to Fall”, Journal of Economic Theory, vol ii
Roemer, J. (1978b) ‘The Effects of Technological Change and the Real Wage on Marx’s Falling Rate of Profit’, Australian Economic Papers, June 1978.
Roemer, John ,(1981), Analytical Foundations of Marxian Economic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.