Autiero, Giuseppina and Bruno, Bruna and Mazzotta, Fernanda (1999): A Correspondence Analysis of Labour Market Institutions. Published in: Economia & Lavoro , Vol. 35, No. 3 (2001): pp. 1-44.
Download (159Kb) | Preview
The aim of the paper is to combine the systemic approach to labour market institutions with the analysis of the role played by the organisational forms of the bargaining partners, which favour coordination both inter partes and intra partes, in order to characterise the 19 countries considered. The methodology adopted is based on Multiple Correspondence Analysis and on the use of a device called doubling. The results show a clear-cut distinction between two groups of countries: the former is characterised by the absence of institutional mechanisms of coordination whereas the latter by the presence of the organisational forms. In details, the countries with regulated labour market functioning but without any control of wages at macroeconomic level have the worst long term unemployment performance. The inter partes coordination role of the government entails the choice of a specific trade-off between direct intervention in the bargaining process and fiscal policy. This trade off performs well when it is supported by intra partes coordination devices. The evidence confirms the existence of the institutional equivalence, leading to the conclusion that better nemployment performances go along with specific institutional set-ups.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||A Correspondence Analysis of Labour Market Institutions|
|Keywords:||labour market institutions, organisations, centralisation|
|Subjects:||C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C1 - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General
J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J5 - Labor-Management Relations, Trade Unions, and Collective Bargaining
|Depositing User:||F. Mazzotta|
|Date Deposited:||19. Apr 2009 23:51|
|Last Modified:||12. Feb 2013 01:41|
Calmfors, L. - Driffill, J. (1988), “Bargaining Structure, Corporatism and Macroeconomic Performance”, Economic Policy, 6.
Flanagan, R.J. (1999), “Macroeconomic Performance and Collective Bargaining: an International Perspective”, Journal of Economic Literature.
Gherghi, M. (1999), Appunti di analisi dei dati multidimensionali: metodologie ed esempi, E.DI.S.U., Napoli.
Greenacre, M.J. (1984), Theory and Applications of Correspondence Analysis, Academic Press, London.
Greenacre, M.J. (1993), Correspondence Analysis in Practice, Academic Press, London.
Hartog J. - Teulings, C. (1998), Corporatism or Competition? Labour Contracts, Institutions and Wage Structure in International Comparison, Cambridge: Cambridge U. Press.
Henley, A. - Tsakalotos, E. (1991), Corporatism or Competition? Labour Contracts, Institutions and Wage Structure in International Comparison, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nickell, S. (1997), “Unemployment and Labor Market Rigidities: Europe versus North America”, Journal of Economic Persperctives, Vol. 11, n. 3. OECD. 1994. Employment Outlook.
OECD. 1995. Employment Outlook.
OECD. 1997. Employment Outlook.
OECD. 1994. Job Study.
Regini, M. (1997), “Still Engaging in Corporatism? Recent Italian Experience in Comparative Perspective, European Journal of Industrial Relations, 3 (3).
Schmid, G. (1995), “Introduction”, in G. Schmid (a cura di) Labour Market Institution in Europe. A Socioeconomic Evaluation of Performance, Armonk, New York, M.E. Sharpe.
Rhodes, M. (1997), “Globalization, Labour Market and Welfare States: a Future of Competitive Corporatism”, EUI Work. Pap. n. 36.
Soskice, D. (1990), “Wage Determination: the Changing role of Institutions in Advanced Industrialized Countries”, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 4.
U.S. Department of Health and Social Service. 1993. Social Security Programs throughout the World.
Wallerstein, M. - Golden, M. - Lange, P. (1997), “Unions, employers Associations, and Wage-Setting Institutions in North and Central Europe, 1950-1992”, Industrial Labour Relations Review, 50:3.