Do women choose to work in the public and nonprofit sectors? Empirical evidence from a French national survey

Narcy, Mathieu and Lanfranchi, Joseph and Meurs, Dominique (2008): Do women choose to work in the public and nonprofit sectors? Empirical evidence from a French national survey.

Abstract

Women are over-represented in public and nonprofit sector jobs. This article aims to bring to light the reasons behind that phenomenon. In particular, do women choose these sectors because they offer female employees specific advantages that are absent from the private sector? The feminization of the public sector can be explained by the fact that women obtain a higher wage gain from choosing this sector than men do. However, this is not true for the nonprofit sector. Working hours - in the form of part-time work in the nonprofit sector and total hours worked in the public sector - appear to play an important role in the over-representation of women in these two sectors. On the other hand, the idea that women are more attracted to the social objectives pursued by public and nonprofit organizations does not appear to play any part. “Family-friendly” measures - aiming to reconcile the demands of family life and professional life - appear to attract women to the public sector, but it is difficult to interpret their influence, because it is impossible to distinguish between the attractiveness of these measures and the result of professional segregation in the public sector.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: women’ employment choices; nonprofit sector; public sector; firms family-friendly policies
• Subjects: J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J4 - Particular Labor Markets > J45 - Public Sector Labor Markets; J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J1 - Demographic Economics > J16 - Economics of Gender ; Non-labor Discrimination

References

ALBRECHT J. W., EDIN P-A., SUNDSTRÖM M. & VROMAN S.B. (1999). Career Interruptions and Subsequent Earnings, Journal of Human Resources, 34, 294-311.

BEM S.L. (1974). The Measurement of Psychological Androgyny, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155-62.

BOLLINGER D. & HOFSTEDE G. (1987). Les différences culturelles dans le management. Comment chaque pays gère-t-il ses hommes. Paris : Editions d’organisation.

BORZAGA C. & TORTIA E. (2006), Worker Motivations, Job Satisfaction, and Loyalty in Public and Nonprofit Social Services, Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 35, 225 - 248.

BUÉ J. (2002). Temps partiel des femmes : entre ‘choix’ et contraintes, Premières Synthèses, n°8.02.

COUPPIÉ T. & EPIPHANE D. (2006). La ségrégation des hommes et des femmes dans les métiers : entre héritage scolaire et construction sur le marché du travail, Revue Formation Emploi, n° 93, 11-27.

CROSON R. & GNEEZY U. (2004). Gender Differences in Preferences, forthcoming in Journal of Economic Literature.

DATTA GUPTA N. & SMITH N. (2002). Children and Career Interruptions, Economica, 69, 609-629.

DGAFP (2007). Rapport annuel sur l’état de la fonction publique 2006-2007. Volume 1 : Faits et chiffres.

ETIENNE J-M. & NARCY M. (2007). Les femmes sont-elles moins discriminées dans l’associatif que dans le privé, Document de Travail ERMES, n°07-02.

FEHR E. & SCHMIDT K.M. (2006) The Economics of Fairness, Reciprocity and Altruism: Experimental Evidence , in Handbook of the Economics of Giving, Altruism and Reciprocity, Vol. 1, ed. by S. Kolm and J. M. Ythier. North Holland, New York.

FRANCOIS P. & VLASSOPOULOS M. (2008). Pro-social Motivation and the Delivery of Social Services, CESifo Economic Studies, 54, 22-54.

GILLIGAN C. (1982). In a Different Voice : Psychological Theory and Women’s Development., Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

HOFFNAR E. & GREENE M. (1998). Gender discrimination in the public and private sectors: A sample selectivity approach, Journal of Socio-Economics, 25, 105-114.

INSEE (2007). Femmes et Hommes. Regards sur la Parité, Statistique Publique et INSEE.

LANFRANCHI J. ET NARCY M. (2006). Wages and effort in the French for-profit and nonprofit sectors: Labor donation theory revisited, Document de travail ERMES, 06-20.

LANFRANCHI J. ET NARCY M. (2008). Différence de satisfaction dans l’emploi entre secteurs à but lucratif et à but non lucratif : le rôle joué par les caractéristiques d’emploi, Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 79, 323-368.

LEETE L. (2000). Wage Equity and Employee Motivation in Nonprofit and For-Profit Organizations, Journal of Economic behaviour and Organization, 43, 423-446.

LIGHT P. (2002). The content of their character: The state of the nonprofit workforce. The Nonprofit Quarterly, 9(3), 6-16.

LUCIFORA C. & MEURS D. (2006). The Public Sector Pay Gap in France, Great Britain and Italy, Review of Income and Wealth, 1, 43-59.

MICHEAUX S. & MONSO O. (2007). Faire garder ses enfants pendant son temps de travail, Insee Première, n°1132.

MUELLER R. E. (1998). Public–private sector wage differentials in Canada: evidence from quantile regressions, Economics Letters, 60, 229-235.

NIELSEN H.S., SIMONSEN M. & VERNER M. (2004). Does the Gap in Family-friendly Policies Drive the Family Gap?, Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 106, 721–744.

PANIZZA U. & ZHEN-WEI QIANG C. (2005). Public–private wage differential and gender gap in Latin America: Spoiled bureaucrats and exploited women?, Journal of Socio-Economics, 34, 810-833.

PONTHIEUX S. & SCHREIBER A. (2006). Dans les couples de salariés, la répartition du travail domestique reste très inégale, Données Sociales, 43-52.

PRESTON A.E. (1990). Women in Non-Profit Organizations: The Best Option or the Only Option, Review of Economics and Statistics, 72, 560-568.

PROUTEAU L. & WOLFF F-C. (2002). La participation associative au regard des temps sociaux, Économie et Statistique, n°352-353, 57-80.

SMALL K.A. & HSIAO C. (1985). Multinomial Logit Specification Tests, International Economic Review, 26, 619-627.

TCHERNONOG V. (2007). Le paysage associatif français. Mesures et évolutions. Dalloz, Paris.

WEITZMAN,M.S., JALANDONI,N.T., LAMPKIN,L.M.,& POLLAK,T.H.(2002). The new nonprofit almanac and desk reference. New York:Jossey-Bass.