Connelly, Luke B. (2003): Balancing the Number and Size of Sites: An Economic Approach to the Optimal Design of Cluster Samples. Published in: Controlled Clinical Trials , Vol. 24, (2003): pp. 544-559.
Download (194kB) | Preview
The design of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) entails decisions that have economic, as well as statistical implications. In particular, the choice of an individual or cluster randomisation design may affect the cost of achieving the desired level of power, other things equal. Furthermore, if cluster randomisation is chosen, the researcher must decide how to balance the number of clusters, or "sites", and the size of each site. This paper investigates these interrelated statistical and economic issues. Its principal purpose is to elucidate the statistical and economic trade-offs to assist researchers to employ RCT designs that have desired economic, as well as statistical, properties.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Balancing the Number and Size of Sites: An Economic Approach to the Optimal Design of Cluster Samples|
|Keywords:||Cluster sample; optimal design; economic analysis|
|Subjects:||C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C4 - Econometric and Statistical Methods: Special Topics > C42 - Survey Methods
C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C9 - Design of Experiments > C93 - Field Experiments
D - Microeconomics > D2 - Production and Organizations > D24 - Production; Cost; Capital; Capital, Total Factor, and Multifactor Productivity; Capacity
|Depositing User:||Luke B. Connelly|
|Date Deposited:||16. Apr 2009 16:09|
|Last Modified:||17. Feb 2013 18:33|
Selvin, S, Statistical Analysis of Epidemiological Data. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1996.
Deaton A and Muellbauer J, Economics and Consumer Behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1980.
Elfving G, Optimum allocation in linear regression theory, Ann Math Statist 1952; 23: 255-62.
Kiefer J, Optimum experimental designs, J R Statist Soc B 1959; 21: 272-304.
Conlisk J and Watts H, A model for optimizing experimental designs for estimating response surfaces, Proceedings of the American Statistical Association 1969, Social Statistics Section; 150-56.
Conlisk J, Choice of response functional form in designing subsidy experiments, Econometrica 1973; 41: 643-56.
American Economic Association: Current status of income maintenance experiments, session, Papers and Proceedings 1971; 61: 15-42.
Newhouse J P and the Insurance Experiment Group, Free for All? Lessons from the Rand Health Insurance Experiment. Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press, 1993.
Morris C, A finite selection model for experimental design of the health insurance study, J Econom 1979; 11: 43-61.
Aigner DJ, Bayesian analysis of optimal sample size and a best decision rule for experiments in direct load control, J Econom 1979; 9: 209-21.
Aigner DJ, Sample design for electricity pricing experiments, J Econom 1979; 11: 195-205.
Aigner DJ, A brief introduction to the methodology of optimal experimental design, J Econom 1979; 11: 7-26.
Aigner DJ and Balestra P, Optimal experimental design for error components models, Econometrica 1988; 56: 955-71.
Hausman JA, The effects of time in economic experiments. In Hildenbrand W (ed) Advances in Econometrics (pp.79-108). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982.
Aigner DJ and Schönfeld P, Experimental design for direct metering of residential electricity end-uses. In Gabszewicz JJ, Richard J-F and Wolsey LA (eds) Economic Decision-Making: Games, Econometrics and Optimisation. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, 1990.
Cohen SB and Yu WW, The impact of alternative sample allocation schemes on the precision of survey estimates derived from the national medical expenditure panel survey, J Econ Soc Meas 2000; 26: 111-128.
Cohen SB and Machlin SR, Survey attrition considerations in the medical expenditure panel survey, J Econ Soc Meas 2000; 26: 83-98.
Howes S and Lanjouw P, Does sample design matter for poverty rate comparisons?, Rev Income Wealth 1998; 44: 99-109.
van Praag B, Kloek T and De Leeuw J, Large-sample properties of method of moment estimators under different data-generating processes, J Econom 1988; 37: 157-69.
Fiebig, DG, Bartels R and Aigner DJ, A random coefficient approach to the estimation of residential end-use load profiles, J Econom 1991; 50: 297-327.
Butler JRG, Hospital Cost Analysis. Dordrecht: Kluwer; 1995.
Carlin JB and Hocking J, Design of cross-sectional surveys using cluster sampling: An overview with Australian case studies, Aust N Z J Public Health, 1999; 23:546-551.
Smeeth L and Ng E S-W, Intraclass correlation coefficients for cluster randomized trials in primary care: data from the MRC Trial of the Assessment and Management of Older People in the Community, Control Clin Trials 2002; 23: 409-21.
Kerry SM and Bland JM, Sample size in cluster randomisation. Br Med J 1998; 316:549.
Nicholson W, Microeconomic Theory: Basic Principles and Extensions. Fort Worth: Dryden Press; 1998.