Herzer, Dierk and Kemper, Niels and Zamparelli, Luca (2009): Balanced growth and structural breaks: Evidence for Germany.
Download (198kB) | Preview
One of the central hypotheses of the neoclassical growth literature is the balanced- growth hypothesis, which predicts that output, consumption, and investment grow at the same rate. Empirically, this implies that the consumption-to-output ratio and the investment-to-output ratio must be stationary and that consumption and investment must be cointegrated with output. This paper tests these implications with respect to Germany, using unit root tests and cointegration techniques that allow for an endogenously determined structural break. We find that the long-run growth path of the German economy is consistent with the balanced-growth hypothesis if we allow for a structural break associated with the worldwide productivity slowdown of the early 1970s.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Balanced growth and structural breaks: Evidence for Germany|
|Keywords:||Balanced growth × Unit roots × Cointegration × Endogenous structural breaks|
|Subjects:||C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C3 - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models ; Multiple Variables > C32 - Time-Series Models ; Dynamic Quantile Regressions ; Dynamic Treatment Effect Models ; Diffusion Processes ; State Space Models
D - Microeconomics > D9 - Intertemporal Choice > D91 - Intertemporal Household Choice ; Life Cycle Models and Saving
E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E2 - Consumption, Saving, Production, Investment, Labor Markets, and Informal Economy > E23 - Production
|Depositing User:||Luca Zamparelli|
|Date Deposited:||01. May 2009 05:15|
|Last Modified:||19. May 2015 00:15|
Ando A, Modigliani F (1963) The ‘live cycle’ hypothesis of saving: aggregate implications and tests. Am Econ Rev 53: 55-84.
Attfield CLF, Temple JRW (2006) Balanced growth and the great ratios: new evidence for the US and UK. Centre for Growth and Business Cycle Research Discussion Paper No. 75. Available at http://www.socialsciences.manchester.ac.uk/cgbcr/dpcgbcr/dpcgbcr75.pdf.
Arrow KJ, Chenery HB, Minhas BS, Solow RM (1961) Capital-labor substitution and economic efficiency. Rev Econ Stud 43: 225-250.
Clemente J, Montanes A, Ponz M (1999) Are the consumption/output and investment/output ratios stationary? An international analysis. Appl Econ Lett 6: 687–691.
de La Grandville O (1989) In quest of the Slutsky diamond. Am Econ Rev 79: 468-81.
Diamond P, McFadden D, Rodriguez M (1978) Measurement of the elasticity of factor substitution and bias of technical change. In: Fuss M, MacFAdden D (ed) Production economics: a dual approach to the theory and application. Elsevier North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 125-147.
Gòmez MA (2008) Dynamics of the saving rate in the neoclassical growth model with CES production. Macroecon. Dynam, 12: 195-210.
Hakkio CS, Rush M (1991) Cointegration: How short is the long run? J Int Money Finance 10: 571-581.
Harrod RF, (1939) An essay in dynamic theory. Economic J, 49: 14-33.
Harvey DL, Leybourne SJ, Newbold P (2003) How great are the great ratios? Appl Econ 35: 163-77.
Johansen S, Mosconi R, Nielsen B (2000) Cointegration analysis in the presence of structural breaks in the deterministic trend. Econometrics J 3: 216-49.
King RG, Plosser CI, Stock JH, Watson MW (1991) Stochastic trends and economic fluctuations. Am Econ Rev 81: 819-40.
King RG, Plosser CI, Rebelo S (2002) Production, growth and business cycle: technical appendix. Computational Econ 20 (1-2): 87-116.
Klein LR, Kosobud RF (1961) Some econometrics of growth: Great ratios of economics. Quart J Econ 75: 173-198.
Klump R, de La Grandville O (2000) Economic growth and the elasticity of substitution: two theorems and some suggestions. Am Econ Rev 90: 282-291.
Klump R, Saam M (2008) Calibration of normalized CES production functions in dynamic models. Econ Letters 99: 256-259.
Lahiri K, Mamingi N (1995) Power versus frequency of observation – another view. Econ Lett 49: 121-124.
MacKinnon J (1996) Numerical distribution functions for unit root and cointegration tests. J Appl Econometrics 11: 601-618.
Li H, Daly V (2009) Testing the balanced growth hypothesis: evidence from China. Empirical Econ (early online article), Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00181-008-0229-7
Maddison A (1987) Growth and slow-down in advanced capitalist economies. J Econ Lit 25: 649-98.
McAdam P, Willman A (2008) Medium run redux: technical change, factor shares and friction in the euro area. European Central Bank Working Paper No. 915. Available at https://www.ecb.int/pub/pdf/scpwps/ecbwp915.pdf
Neusser K (1991) Testing the long-run implications of the neoclassical growth model. J Monet Econ 27: 3-37.
Perron P, Vogelsang TJ (1992) Nonstationarity and level shifts with an application to purchasing power parity. J Bus and Econ Statist 10: 301-20.
Reinsel GC, Ahn SK (1992) Vector autoregressive models with unit roots and reduced rank structure: Estimation, likelihood ratio and forecasting. J Time Ser Anal 13: 353-75.
Serletis A, Krichel K (1995) International evidence on the long-run implications of the neoclassical growth model. Appl Econ 27, 205-10.
Shiller RJ, Perron P (1985) Testing the random walk hypothesis: power versus frequency of observation. Econ Letters 18, 381-386.
Smetters K (2003) The (interesting) dynamic properties of the neoclassical growth model with CES production. Rev Econ Dynam 6: 697-707.
Solow RM (1956) A contribution to the theory of economic growth, Quart J Econ 70: 65-94.
Trenkler C (2008) Determining p-values for systems cointegration tests with a prior adjustment for deterministic terms. Computational Stat 23, 19-39.