Munich Personal RePEc Archive
Login | Create Account

Should for-profit schools be banned?

Chumacero, Romulo and Paredes, Ricardo (2008): Should for-profit schools be banned? Unpublished.

[img]
Preview
PDF - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
200Kb

Abstract

This paper uses different methods to evaluate the performance of students of public, subsidized, and private schools; distinguishing among for-profit and non-profit schools.

Item Type:MPRA Paper
Language:English
Keywords:Voucher System; Education; Non-profit; Chile
Subjects:H - Public Economics > H5 - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies > H52 - Government Expenditures and Education
C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C2 - Econometric Methods: Single Equation Models; Single Variables > C21 - Cross-Sectional Models; Spatial Models; Treatment Effect Models; Quantile Regressions
I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I2 - Education and Research Insititutions > I22 - Educational Finance
ID Code:15099
Deposited By:Romulo Chumacero
Deposited On:09. May 2009 19:39
Last Modified:09. May 2009 19:39
References:

Chumacero, R., D. Gómez, and R. Paredes (2008), “I Would Walk 500 Miles (if it paid),” Manuscript, University of Chile.

Easley, D. and M. O’Hara (1983), “The Economic Role of the Nonprofit Firm,” Bell Journal of Economics 14(2), 531-538.

Holtmann, A. (1983), “A Theory of Non-Profit Firms,” Economica 50, 439-449.

Hoxby, C. (1994), “Do Private Schools Provide Competition for Public Schools?,” Working Paper 4978, NBER.

Hoxby, C. (2000), “Does Competition Among Public Schools Benefit Students and Taxpayers?,” American Economic Review 90 (5), 1209-1238.

Hoxby, C. (2005), “Competition Among Public Schools: A Reply to Rothstein (2004),” Working Paper 11216, NBER.

Hsieh, C. and M. Urquiola (2006), “The Effects of Generalized School Choice on Achievement and Stratification: Evidence from Chile’s Voucher Program,” Journal of Public Economics 90, 1477-1503.

Lavy, V. (2005), “From Forced Busing to Free Choice in Public Schools: Individual and General Equilibrium Effects,” Manuscript, Hebrew University.

Lott, J. (1987), “Why is Education Publicly Provided? A Critical Survey,” CATO Journal 7(2), 475-501.

Lott, J. (1999), “Public Schooling, Indoctrination, and Totalitarianism,” Journal of Political Economy 107(6), S127-S157.

Lott, J. (2007), Freedomnomics: Why the Free Market Works and Other Half-Baked Theories Don’t, Regnery.

Paredes, R. and J. I. Pinto (2008): “¿Se Está Acabando la Educación Pública en Chile?,” Working Paper, Departamento de Ingeniería Industrial, Universidad Católica de Chile.

Rose-Ackerman, S. (1987), “Ideals versus Dollars: Donors, Charity Managers, and Government Grants,” Journal of Political Economy 95(4), 810-823.

Rose-Ackerman, S. (1996), “Altruism, Nonprofits, and Economic Theory,” Journal of Economic Literature 34, 701-728.

Rothstein, J. (2004), “Good Principals or Good Peers: Parental Valuation of School Characteristics, Tiebout Equilibrium, and the Incentive Effects of Competition among Jurisdictions.” Working Paper 10666, NBER.

Rothstein, J. (2005), ”Does Competition Among Public Schools Benefit Students and Taxpayers? A Comment on Hoxby (2000)” Working Paper 11215, NBER.

Sandstrom, F. and F. Bergstrom (2005), “School Vouchers in Practice: Competition Will Not Hurt You,” Journal of Public Economics 89, 351-380.

Steinberg, R. (1986), “The Revealed Objective Functions of Nonprofit Firms,” Rand Journal of Economics 17(4), 508-526.

All papers reproduced by permission. Reproduction and distribution subject to the approval of the copyright owners.
Repository Staff Only: item control page

LMU-Logo
MPRA is a RePEc service hosted by
the Munich University Library in Germany.