Giuriato, Luisa (2008): Combining autocracy and majority voting: the canonical succession rules of the Latin Church. Published in: UCSIA Discussion Papers No. 0715
Download (381kB) | Preview
The autocratic turn of the Latin Church in the XI-XIII century, a reaction to the secular power interferences, concentrated the decision-making power in the hands of the top hierarchy, and finally in the hands of the pope. A fundamental step was the change and the constitutionalisation of the procedures for leadership replacement, which were open successions where the contest for power was governed by elections. The autocratic reform limited the active electorate to the clergy only and gradually substituted the episcopal elections by the pope’s direct appointment. Besides, the voting rules changed from unanimity to the dual principle of maioritas et sanioritas (where the majority was identified with the greater part by number and wisdom) and finally to the numerical rule of qualified majority. This evolution aimed at preserving the elections from external interferences and at eliminating the elements of arbitrariness. The most important succession, the papal election, was protected by institutionalising a selectorate and its decision-making rules. The selectorate and the elections did not insert accountability and representation mechanisms but only protected the quality of the autocratic leadership and its autonomy.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Combining autocracy and majority voting: the canonical succession rules of the Latin Church|
|Keywords:||Theocracies, Autocracy, Succession rules|
|Subjects:||D - Microeconomics > D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making > D70 - General
D - Microeconomics > D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making > D72 - Political Processes: Rent-Seeking, Lobbying, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior
|Depositing User:||Luisa Giuriato|
|Date Deposited:||14. May 2009 07:43|
|Last Modified:||01. May 2014 02:36|
Acemoglu, D. and Robinson J. (2006) Economic Backwardness in Political Perspective, American Political Science Review, 100, pp.115-131.
Alberigo, G. (1989). Il Cristianesimo in Italia. Bari: Ed. Laterza.
Berman, H.J. (1983) Law and Revolution. The Formation of the Western Legal Tradition. Cambridge (Mass.) and London: Harvard University Press.
Besley, T. and Kudamatsu K. (2007) Making Autocracy Work, CEPR Discussion Paper, 6371.
Blumenthal U.R. (1994). La querelle des investitures, in Levillain, Ph. (ed.), Dictionnaire historique de la papauté, Paris: Fayard, 1409-1411.
Buchanan, J. and Tullock G. (1962). The calculus of consent. Ann Arbor: Michigan University Press.
Bueno de Mesquita, B. et al. (2003) The Logic of Political Survival. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Camelot et al. (2001). I concili ecumenici. Brescia: Queriniana
Galeotti, G. (2003) Voting rules, in Breton A., Galeotti G., Salmon P. and Wintrobe R. (eds) Rational Foundation of Democratic Policy. New York and Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 177-197.
Gaudemet, J. (1997). Les élections dans l’Eglise Latine des origines au XVI siècle. Paris: Editions F. Lanore.
Gaudemet, J. (1998). Storia del diritto canonico. Ecclesia et civitas. Cinisello Balsamo: San Paolo.
Gordon, S. (1999) Controlling the State. Constitutionalism from ancient Athens to Today. Cambridge (Mass.) and London: Harvard University Press.
Grossi P. (1958) Unanimitas, Annali di Storia del Diritto.
Grossman, H. and Noh S.J. (1994) Proprietary Public Finance and Public Welfare, Journal of Public Economics, 53, p.187-204.
Klick, J. and Parisi F. (2003). The Disunity of Unanimity, Constitutional Political Economy, 14, 83-94.
Kurrild-Klitgaard, P. (2000) The constitutional economics of autocratic succession, Public Choice, 103, 63-84.
Levillain, Ph. (ed.) (1994) Dictionnaire historique de la papauté, Fayard.
Mueller, D. (2003) Public Choice III. New York and Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Overland, J. et al. (2005) Political Instability and Growth in Dictatorships, Public Choice, 25 (3-4), pp.445-470.
Pacaut, M. La théocratie. L’Eglise et le pouvoir au Moyen Age. Paris: Aubier.
Tullock, G. (1987) Autocracy. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Zizola, G.(1993) Il conclave. Roma : Newton Compton Editori.