Opocher, Arrigo (2009): A Dual-Solovian Measure of Productivity Increase and its Early Antecedents.
Download (133kB) | Preview
The duality between a production function and the cost function generated by it implies that a Solovian ‘growth accounting’ measure of productivity increase, as referred to the industry, has an equivalent dual measure, based on what may be called ‘price accounting’. It is argued in this paper that the dual measure provides a coherent framework for considering productivity increase in relation to inflation/deflation, earnings dispersion, long-run variations in domestic relative prices and in external terms of trade. Even though the theoretical interest in measures based on real input prices dates back to the late 1960s, few or no attempts have been made thereafter to adopt it in practice. Curiously enough, the practical adoption of some kind of ‘price accounting’ dates to much earlier. We argue in this paper that, during the 19th century, distinguished statisticians and economic commentators such as G.R. Porter and R. Giffen based their evaluations on the comparative change in prices, wages and profits and in so doing they followed a logic that remarkably resembles that of a dual-Solovian measure.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||A Dual-Solovian Measure of Productivity Increase and its Early Antecedents|
|Keywords:||productivity increase, TFP, cost function, real wages, income distribution|
|Subjects:||D - Microeconomics > D3 - Distribution > D33 - Factor Income Distribution
B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B1 - History of Economic Thought through 1925 > B16 - Quantitative and Mathematical
D - Microeconomics > D2 - Production and Organizations > D24 - Production; Cost; Capital; Capital, Total Factor, and Multifactor Productivity; Capacity
|Depositing User:||Arrigo Opocher|
|Date Deposited:||04. Jun 2009 08:29|
|Last Modified:||19. Feb 2013 06:27|
Atkinson A.B. (2007), ‘The Distribution of earnings in OECD Countries’, International Labour Review, 146 (1-2): 41-60.
Checchi D. and C. García-Peñalosa (2008), ‘Labour market institutions and income inequality’, Economic Policy, October 2008: 601-649.
Denison E.F. (1962), The Sources of Economic Growth in the United States and the Alternatives before Us. Committee on Economic Development, New York.
Domar E.D. (1961), ‘On the Measurement of Technological Change’,Economic Journal, 71 (284): 709-729.
Giffen R. (1888), ‘Recent Changes in Prices and Incomes Compared’, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 51 (4): 713-815.
Giffen R. (1886), ‘Further Notes on the Progress of the Working Classes in the Last Half Century’, Journal of the Statistical Society of London, 49, (1): 28-100.
Giffen R. (1879), ‘On the Fall of Prices of Commodities in Recent Years, Journal of the Statistical Society of London, 42, (1): 36-78.
Hall R.A. (1968), ‘Technical Change and Capital from the Point of View of the Dual’, The Review of Economic Studies, 35 (1): 35-46.
Hulten C.R. (1978), ‘Growth Accounting with Intermediate Inputs’, Review of Economic Studies, 45 (3): 511-18.
Jevons W.S. (1865), ‘On the Variation of Prices and the Value of the Currency since 1782’, Journal of the Statistical Society of London, 28, (2): 294-320.
Jorgenson D.W. (1990), ‘Productivity and Economic Growth’, in E.R. Bernt and J.E. Triplett, Fifty Years of Economic Measurement, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London.
Jorgenson D.W. and Z. Griliches (1967), ‘The Explanation of Productivity Change’, The Review of Economic Studies, 34 (3): 249-283.
Jorgenson D.W., Gollop F.M., Fraumeni B.M. (1987), Productivity and U.S. Economic Growth, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Jorgenson D.W. and K.J. Stiroh (2000), ‘U.S. Economic growth at the industry level’, The American Economic Review, 90 (2): 161-167.
Lydall H. (1969), ‘On Measuring Technical Progress’, Australian Economic Papers, 6 (12): 1-12.
Katz, L. F.; Autor, D. H. 1999. “Changes in the wage structure and earnings inequality”, in Orley Ashenfelter and David Card (eds): Handbook of labor economics. Volume 3A. Amsterdam, Elsevier: 1463–1555.
Kendrik J.W. (1961), Productivity Trends in the U.S., Princeton University Press.
OECD (2001), Measuring Productivity, OECD.
Opocher A. (2010), ‘The Future of the Working Classes: A Comparison between J.S. Mill and A. Marshall’ European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 17(2), forthcoming.
Porter G.R. (1851) , The Progress of the Nation, 3rd edition, London, John Murray.
Solow R.M. (1957), ‘Technical Change and the Aggregate Production Function’, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 39 (3): 312-320.
Steedman I. (1983), ‘On the Measurement and Aggregation of Productivity Increase’, Metroeconomica, 35 (3): 223-233.
World Bank (2006), ‘Equity and Development’, World Development Report 2006.