Fuerst, Franz and McAllister, Patrick (2009): An Investigation of the Effect of Eco-Labeling on Office Occupancy Rates.
Download (142Kb) | Preview
This paper investigates the effect of eco-labeling on the occupancy rates of commercial offices in the US. The occupancy rates of LEED and Energy Star labeled offices are compared to a sample of non-labeled offices which were selected to include properties in the same submarkets. Significant differences are found between the two types of labeling. While Energy Star labeled offices are more likely to be multi-tenanted compared to the total sample, single tenant occupancy tends to be over-represented among LEED labeled offices. Using OLS and quantile regression analyses, a significant positive relationship is found between occupancy rate and the eco-label. Controlling for differences in age, height, building class and quality, the results suggest that occupancy rates are 5-7% higher in LEED labeled buildings and 1.5-3.5% higher in Energy Star labeled buildings. However, the effects are concentrated in certain market segments.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||An Investigation of the Effect of Eco-Labeling on Office Occupancy Rates|
|Keywords:||Eco-certification, real estate economics, dynamics of office occupancy rates|
|Subjects:||Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics
C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C3 - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models; Multiple Variables > C31 - Cross-Sectional Models; Spatial Models; Treatment Effect Models; Quantile Regressions; Social Interaction Models
R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R3 - Real Estate Markets, Production Analysis, and Firm Location > R33 - Nonagricultural and Nonresidential Real Estate Markets
|Depositing User:||Franz Fuerst|
|Date Deposited:||19. Jun 2009 05:46|
|Last Modified:||11. Feb 2013 17:01|
Berry, T. 2007. Towards a green building and infrastructure investment fund: A review of challenges and opportunities. Compass Resource Management.
Eicholtz, P., N. Kok, and J. Quigley, Doing Well By Doing Good? Green Office Buildings, Working paper, Fisher Center for Real Estate and Urban Economics, UC Berkeley, January, 2009.
Frew, J. and Jud, G. 1988 Vacancy Rates in Rent Levels in the Commercial Office Market, Journal of Real Estate Research, 1-8.
GVA Grimley. 2007. Towards Sustainable Offices. Research Bulletin, Spring, 2007.
Kats, G. 2003. The Costs and Financial Benefits of Green Buildings – A Report to California’s Sustainable Building Task Force. Capital E, October 2003.
Koenker, R. and Hallock, K.F. 2001. Quantile Regression. Journal of Economic Perspectives. 15/4, 143–156.
Koenker, R. 2005. Quantile Regression. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kotchen, M. 2006. Green Markets and Private Provision of Public Goods. Journal of Political Economy 114: 816-834.
McGraw Hill Construction. 2006. Green Building Smart Report.
Miller, N., Spivey, J. Florance, A. (2008): Does Green Pay Off? Journal of Real Estate Portfolio Management. 14/4, 385-399.
Morrison Hershfield. 2005. A Business Case for Green Buildings. Internal Morrison Hershfield Report.
National Real Estate Investor, 2008. Fighting Obsolescence: Green Building Survey 2008.
Nelson, A. 2007. The Greening of U.S. Investment Real Estate – Market Fundamentals, Prospects and Opportunities. RREEF Research Report No. 57. Sirmans, G., Sirmans, C. and Benjamin, J. 1990. Rental Concessions and Property Values, Journal of Real Estate Research, 141-151. Rosen, S. 1974. Hedonic prices and explicit markets: production differentiation in pure competition. Journal of Political Economy 82: 34–55.
Wiley, J., Benefield, J. and Johnson, K. Green Design and the Market for Commercial Office Space, Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, forthcoming.
Available Versions of this Item
- An Investigation of the Effect of Eco-Labeling on Office Occupancy Rates. (deposited 19. Jun 2009 05:46) [Currently Displayed]