Firms’ Innovative Performance: The Mediating Role of Innovative Collaborations

Lee, Lena and Wong, Poh Kam (2009): Firms’ Innovative Performance: The Mediating Role of Innovative Collaborations.

Abstract

While existing studies have provided many insightful discussions on the antecedents to innovative collaborations and the benefits of collaborative behavior, few studies have focused on the mediating role of innovative collaborations in enhancing the firm’s technological innovative performance. In this paper, we investigate the mediating role of the firm’s innovative collaborations in the relation between government innovation support and the firm’s product and process innovation intensities. As a mediating factor in the innovation process, innovative collaborations form part of the innovative inputs that contribute to the firm’s product and process innovation intensities. Using arguments derived from the resource-based theory, we found that while receipts of government innovation support help increase the firm’s level of innovative inputs as observed in its collaboration intensity, it is equally important for firms to internalize management practices that encourage maximum leverage of government innovation support for pursuits of innovative collaborations. In a similar vein, while innovative collaborations are necessary for realizing innovative outputs including product and process innovations, it is not a sufficient condition for achieving strong innovative performance. The firm’s internal capabilities as observed in its learning, R&D, resource allocation, manufacturing, marketing, organizing, and strategic planning abilities have a positive influence on the relationship between innovative collaborations and innovative outputs.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Innovative Performance; Innovative Collaboration; Firm’s Contextual Factors
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D2 - Production and Organizations > D23 - Organizational Behavior ; Transaction Costs ; Property Rights; M - Business Administration and Business Economics ; Marketing ; Accounting ; Personnel Economics > M1 - Business Administration; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O32 - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D

References

Acs, Z., and Yeung, 1999. Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises in the Global Economy. University of Michigan Press.

Audretsch, D.B. (2004). Sustaining Innovation and Growth: Public Policy Support for Entrepreneurship, Industry and Innovation, 11(3): 167-191.

Baldridge, J.V., and Burnham, R.A. 2005. Organisational Innovation: Individual, Organisational, and Environmental Impacts. Administrative Science Quarterly 20(2): 165-176.

Barney, J.B. 1986. Strategic factor markets: expectations, luck, and business strategy, Management Science, 32(10): 1231-1241.

Barney, J.B., 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage, Journal of Management, 17(1): 99-120.

Baum, J., and Oliver, C. 1991. Institutional Linkages and Organizational Mortality. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36: 187-218.

Beaver, G. 2001. Innovation, high technology and the new enterprise. Strategic Change 10(8): 421-426.

Becker, W., and Dietz, J. 2004. R&D Cooperation and innovation activities of firms – evidence for the German manufacturing industry. Research Policy 33: 209-223.

Belderbos, R., Carree, M., and Lokshin, B. 2004. Cooperative R&D and firm performance. Research Policy 33(10): 1477-1492.

Bozeman, B. and Link, A. N. 1983. Investments in Technology: Corporate Strategies & Public Policy Alternatives, Praeger Publishers, New York.

Brown, T., Davidsson, P., and Wiklund, J., 2001. An Operationaliszation of Stevenson’s Conceptualization of Entrepreneurship As Opportunity-Based Firm Behavior, Strategic Management Journal 22(10): 953-968.

Buisseret, T.J., Cameron, H., and Georghiou, L. 1995. What difference does it make? Additionality in the public support of R&D in large firms, International Journal of Technology Management, Vol.10, Nos. 4/5/6 pp. 587-600.

Burgelman, R.A., Christensen, C.M., and Wheelwright, S.C. 2004. Strategic Management of Technology and Innovation, Boston, Mass: McGraw-Hill.

Census of Manufacturing Activities – CMA 2006. Singapore Annual Census of Manufacturing Activities.

Chatterjee, S., and Price, B. 1991. Regression analysis by example. New York: Wiley.

Cohen, W., & Levin, R. 1989. Empirical studies of innovation and market structure. In R. Schmalensee and R. D. Willig (Eds.), Handbook of Industrial Organization, Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, 1059-1107.

Dosi, G. 1988. Sources, procedures and microeconomic effects of innovation. Journal of Economic Literature, 36, 1126-1171.

Fritsch, M., and Meschede, M., 2001. Product innovation, process innovation and size, Review of Industrial Organization, 19(3): 335-350.

Fu, T.F., and Robertson, P.L. 2000. Technological capabilities and small manufacturing firms in Foss, N.J., and Robertson, P.L. (ed.), Resources, technology and strategy: explorations in the resource-based perspective. London, New York: Routledge.

Gold, B. 1986. Strengthening the Technological Competitiveness of Industries: Potential Contribution of Government, in: Dermer, J. (ed.) Competitiveness through Technology: What Business Needs from Government, Lexington Books, Lexington Books, Lexington, Mass.

Grant, R.M. 1991. The Resource-Based Theory of Competitive Advantage: Implications for strategy formulation, California Management Review, 33: 114-135.

Hall, R.H., 1993. A framework linking intangible resources and capabilities to sustainable competitive advantage, Strategic Management Journal, 14: 607-618.

Hamel, G.Y., Doz, Y., and Prahalad, C. 1989. Collaborate with your competitors and Win. Harvard Business Review: 133-139.

Hauknes, J., 1999. Norwegian input-output clusters and innovation patters. In: OECD Proceedings: Boosting Innovation. The Cluster Approach. OECD Publications Service, Paris: 60-90.

He, Z.L., and Wong, P.K., 2004. Exploration vs. Exploitation: An Empirical Test of the Ambidexterity Hypothesis, Organization Science, 15(4): 481-494.

Hollenstein, H. 1996. A Composite indicator of a firm’s innovativeness. An empirical analysis based on survey data for Swiss manufacturing. Research Policy 25: 633-645.

Hunt, S.D., and Morgan, R.M. 1997. Resource-Advantage Theory: A Snake Swallowing Its Tail or a General Theory of Competition?” Journal of Marketing, 61: 74-82.

Janne, O.E.M. 2002. The emergence of corporate integrated innovation systems across regions: The case of the chemical and pharmaceutical industry in Germany, the UK, and Belgium. Journal of International Management, 8(1): 97-119.

Kaufmann, A. and Tödtling, F., 2002. How effective is innovation support for SMEs? An analysis of the region of Upper Austria. Technovation, 22(3): 147-159.

Kogut, B., and Zander, U. 1992. Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization Science 3(3): 383-397.

Kohler, S.S., and Mathieu, J.E. 1993. Individual characteristics, work perceptions, and affective reactions influences on differentiated absence criteria. Journal of Organizational Behavior 14(6): 515-530.

Kotabe, M., Martin, X., Domoto, H. 2003. Gaining from vertical partnerships: knowledge transfer, relationship duration, and supplier performance improvement in the U.S. and Japanese Automative Industries, Strategic Management Journal, 24 (4): 293-316.

Leyden, D.P., and Link, A.N. 1992. Technological innovations; Government Policy. United States.

Li, H., and Atuahene-Gima, K., 2001. Product Innovation Strategy and the Performance of New Technology Ventures in China, Academy of Management Journal, 44(6): 1123-1134.

Long, J.S., and Freese, J. 2006. Regression models for categorical dependent variables using Stata, 2nd Edition. Stata Press.

Lundvall, B.A. and Borras, S. 1998. The globalizing learning economy: Implications for innovation policy. Report prepared under the TSER Programme, DG XII, Commission of the European Union, Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European communities.

Miner, A., Amburgey, T., and Stearns, T. 1990. Interorganizational Linkages and Population Dynamics. Buffering and Transformational Shields. Administrative Science Quarterly 35: 689-713.

Mohnen, P., and Roller, L.H. 2005. Complementarities in innovation policy. European Economic Review 49(6): 1431-1450.

Nelson, R.R., 1993. National Innovation Systems: A comparative analysis. New York. Oxford University Press. OECD-EUROSTAT, 1997. Proposed Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Technological Innovation Data, Oslo Manual, 2nd ed. OECD, Paris, France.

OECD, 1998. Public/Private partnership in science and technology: an overview, STI Review 23, 7-21.

Porter M., and Fuller, M. 1986. Coalitions and Global Strategies, in Porter (ed.) Competition in Global Industries, HBS Press, Boston.

Porter, M.E. 1996. What is Strategy? Harvard Business Review: 61-78.

Prahalad, C.K., Hamel, H., 1990. The core competence of the corporation, Harvard Business Review, 68: 79-91.

Robertson, P.K. 1996. Competences, Transaction Costs and Competitive Strategy in N.J. Foss and C. Knudsen (eds), Towards A Competence Theory of the Firm. London, Routledge.

Rudma, S.T., 2001. Are successful innovators high performers? Insights from Israel’s largest companies, Academy of Management Executive, 15(1): 149-150.

Sakakibara, M. 1997. Evaluating Government-Sponsored R&D Consortia in Japan: Who Benefits and How, Research Policy, 26: 447-473.

Schumpeter, J. 1934. The Theory of Economic Development, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

Soete, B., and Stephan, A. 2004. Introduction: Entrepreneurship, Innovation and Growth. Industry and Innovation 11(3): 161-165

Shaw, B., 1994. User-supplier links and innovation. In: Dodgson, M., Rothwell, R. (Eds.), The Handbook of Industrial Innovation. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK.

Stevenson, H.H., 1983. A perspective on entrepreneurship. Harvard Business School Working Paper, 9-384-131.

Stevenson, H. H. and Jarillo, J.J. 1986. Preserving entrepreneurship as companies grow. Journal of Business Strategy 6, 10-23.

Tether, B.S. 2002. Who co-operates for innovation, and why. An empirical analysis, Research Policy, 31: 947-967.

Tidd, J., Bessant, J., Pavitt, K., 1997. Managing Innovation: Integrating Technological, Market and Organizational Change. Wiley, Chichester.

Tripsas, M., Schrader, S. and Sobrero, M. 1995. Discouraging Opportunistic Behavior in collaborative R&D: A New Role for Government, Research Policy, 24(3): 367-389.

Von Hippel. 1988. The Sources of Innovation. Oxford University Press, New York.

Vonortas, N., 1997. Cooperation in Research and Development. Boston.

Wakelin, K. 1998. Innovation and Export Behaviour at the firm level. Research Policy 26: 829-841.

Wernerfelt, B., 1984. A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal 5, 171-180.

Wong, P.K. and He, Z.L., 2003. The Moderating effect of a firm’s internal climate for innovation on the impact of public R&D support programs, International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 3(5/6): 525-545.

Yam, R.C.M., Guan, J.C.., Pun, K.F., and Tang, E.P.Y., 2004. An audit of technological innovation capabilities in Chinese firms: some empirical findings in Beijing, China. Research Policy, 33(8): 1123-1140.