Milanovic, Branko (2009): Global inequality recalculated: The effect of new 2005 PPP estimates on global inequality.
Download (213Kb) | Preview
The results of new direct price level comparisons across 146 countries in 2005 have led to large revisions of PPP (purchasing power parity) exchanges rates, particularly for China and India. The recalculation of international and global inequalities, using the new PPPs, shows that inequalities are substantially higher than previously thought. Inequality between global citizens is estimated at 70 Gini points rather than 65 as before. The richest decile receives 57 percent of global income rather than 50 percent.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Global inequality recalculated: The effect of new 2005 PPP estimates on global inequality|
|Keywords:||Global inequality; Purchasing power parity|
|Subjects:||D - Microeconomics > D3 - Distribution > D31 - Personal Income, Wealth, and Their Distributions
I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I3 - Welfare and Poverty
O - Economic Development, Technological Change, and Growth > O5 - Economywide Country Studies > O57 - Comparative Studies of Countries
|Depositing User:||Branko Milanovic|
|Date Deposited:||03. Aug 2009 05:43|
|Last Modified:||16. Feb 2013 00:45|
Ahmed, Sultan (1983), “International comparison of Chinese prices”, unpublished World Bank working paper, World Bank: Comparative Analysis and Data Division, Washington, D.C.
Australian Bureau of Statistics (2006), “The International Comparison Program and purchasing power parities”. Available at http://siteresources.worldbank.org/ICPINT/Resources/internationalppp_AUS.pdf.
Anand, Sudhir and Paul Segal (2007), “What do we know about global income inequality?”, Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 46(1), pp. 57–94.
Chen, Shaohua and Martin Ravallion (2008), “The developing world is poorer than we thought, but no less successful in the fight against poverty, Policy Research Working Paper No. 4703, August.
Deaton, Angus (2003), “Measuring poverty in a growing world (or measuring growth in a poor world)”, Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 1, pp. 1-19, February 2005.
Milanovic, Branko (2005), Worlds Apart: Measuring International and Global Inequality, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Milanovic, Branko (2005a) “Why did the poorest countries fail to catch up?”, Carnegie Working Paper No. 62, September 2005.
Milanovic, Branko (2008), “An even higher global inequality than previously thought: A note on global inequality calculations using the 2005 International Comparison Program results”, International Journal of Health Services, volume 38, No. 3, 2008, pp. 421-429.
Minoiu, Camelia and Sanjay Reddy (2009), Real income stagnation of countries: 1960-2001, Journal of Development Studies, Vol. 45(1), pp. 1–23.
Pritchett, Lant (1997), “Divergence, Big Time”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol.11, No. 3, pp. 3-17.
Ravallion, Martin (2000), “Should poverty measures be anchored to the national accounts?” Economic and Political Weekly, 34 (August 26), pp. 3245-3252.
Ruoen, Ren and Kai Chen (1995), “China's GDP in U.S. dollars based on purchasing power parity”, Policy Research Working Paper No. 1415.
World Bank (2006), World Development Report 2006: Equity and Development, Washington D.C.:Oxford University Press and the World Bank.
World Bank (2008), Global Purchasing Power: Parities and Real Expenditures, 2005 International Comparison Program, Washington D.C.: and the World Bank.