Pradhan, Jaya Prakash (2003): Liberalization, Firm Size and R&D performance: A Firm Level Study of Indian Pharmaceutical Industry. Published in: Journal of Indian School of Political Economy , Vol. 14, No. 4 (2002): pp. 647-666.
Download (202Kb) | Preview
In the present paper, it is attempted to empirically verify the impact of economic liberalization on the R&D behaviour of Indian pharmaceutical firms controlling for the effects of several firm specific characteristics including firm size. The results from the Tobit analysis for a sample of firms over the period 1989-90 to 2000-01 indicate that competitive pressure generated by liberalization has worked effectively in pushing Indian pharmaceutical firms into R&D activity. A host of firm characteristics like firm age, size, profitability, intangible assets, export orientation and outward foreign direct investment are also found to be important determinants of innovative activity in the industry. The study suggests several policy measures to further indigenous technological efforts of pharmaceutical firms, which include, removing obstacles that inhibit outward orientation of firms, providing special scheme for small size firms in the overall technology policy for the industry, intensifying collaborative research efforts between private sectors and government research institution, and utilizing flexibilities in the TRIMs agreements to persuade foreign firms to relocate their R&D units into the country.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Liberalization, Firm Size and R&D performance: A Firm Level Study of Indian Pharmaceutical Industry|
|English Title:||Liberalization, Firm Size and R&D performance: A Firm Level Study of Indian Pharmaceutical Industry|
|Keywords:||Indian Pharmaceutical Industry; R&D|
|Subjects:||L - Industrial Organization > L6 - Industry Studies: Manufacturing > L65 - Chemicals; Rubber; Drugs; Biotechnology
O - Economic Development, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Technological Change; Research and Development; Intellectual Property Rights > O32 - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D
O - Economic Development, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Technological Change; Research and Development; Intellectual Property Rights > O31 - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives
|Depositing User:||Jaya Prakash Pradhan|
|Date Deposited:||03. Sep 2009 14:15|
|Last Modified:||12. Feb 2013 11:57|
Amsden, A. H. (2001) The Rise of the Rest: Challenges to the West from Late-Industrializing Economies. New York: Oxford University Press.
Amsden, A. H., Ted Tschang and Akira Goto (2001) ‘Do Foreign Companies Conduct R&D in Developing Countries? A New Approach to Analyzing the level of R&D, with an Analysis of Singapore’, ADB Institute Working Paper 14, Tokyo.
Aw, Bee Yan and Geeta Batra (1998) ‘Technological Capability and Firm Efficiency in Taiwan (China)’, The World Bank Economic Review, 12 (1), pp.59-79.
Basant, Rakesh (1997) ‘Technology Strategies of Large Enterprises in Indian industry: Some Explorations’, World Development, 25(10), pp. 1683-1700.
Bell, Martin. And Keith Pavitt (1992) ‘Accumulating Technological Capability in Developing Countries’, Proceedings of the World Bank Annual Conference on Development Economics, 1992, pp. 257-581.
Braga, H. and L. Willmore (1991) ‘Technological imports and technological efforts: an analysis of their determinants in Brazilian firms’, The Journal of Industrial Economics, 39 (4), pp. 421-432.
Caves, R. E. (1971) ‘International Corporations: the Industrial Economics of Foreign Investment’, Economica, 38, pp. 1-27.
Chen, E. K. Y. (1983) ‘Multinationals from Hong Kong’ in Lall (ed.) The New Multinationals: The Spread of Third World Enterprises, John Wiley & Sons, New York. pp. 88-126.
Cohen, W.M. (1995) ‘Empirical Studies of Innovative Activity’, in Paul Stoneman (ed.), Handbook of the Economics of Innovation and Technological Change, Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 182-264.
Deolalikar, Anil B. and Robert E. Evenson (1989) ‘Technology Production and Technology Purchase in Indian Industry: An Econometric Analysis’, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 71 (4), pp. 687-697.
Desai, A.V. (1980) ‘The Origin and Direction of Industrial R&D in India’, Research Policy, 9 (Jan.1980), pp. 74-96.
Euh, Y. and S. H. Min (1986) ‘Foreign Direct Investment from Developing Countries: The Case of Korean Firms’, The Developing Economies, xxxiv-2, pp. 149-168.
Fikkert, Brian (1993) An Open or Closed Technology Policy? The Effects of Technology Licensing, Foreign Direct Investment, and Technology Spillovers in Indian Industrial Sector Firms, Ph.D. Dissertation, Yale University.
GOI (2001) INDIA, Publication Division, Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, New Delhi.
Haksar, V. (1995) ‘Externalities, Growth and Technology Transfer: Application to the Indian Manufacturing Sector, 1975-90’, Washington DC: IMF, mimeo.
Hymer, S. H. (1976) The International Operations of National Firms: a Study of Direct Foreign Investment, Boston, MIT Press.
Katrak, Homi (1985) ‘Imported Technology, Enterprise Size and R&D in a Newly Industrializing Country: The Indian Experience’, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 47, pp. 213-230.
Katrak, Homi (1990) ‘Imports of Technology and the Technological Efforts of Indian Enterprises’, World Development, 18(3), pp. 371-381.
Katrak, Homi (1997) ‘Developing countries’ imports of technology, in-house technological capabilities and efforts: an analysis of the Indian experience’, Journal of Development Economics, 53, pp. 67-83.
Katz, J. and B. Kosacoff (1983) ‘Multinationals from Argentina’, in Lall (ed.) The New Multinationals: The Spread of Third World Enterprises, John Wiley & Sons, New York. pp. 137-219.
Kindleberger, C. P. (1969) American Business Abroad, New Haven: Yale University Press.
Kumar, K. and K. Y. Kim (1984) ‘The Korean Manufacturing Multinationals’, Journal of International Business Studies, Spring/Summer, pp. 45-61.
Kumar, Nagesh (1987) ‘Technology Imports and Local Research and Development in Indian Manufacturing’, The Developing Economies, xxv-3, pp. 220-233.
Kumar, Nagesh (1996) ‘Intellectual Property Protection, Market Orientation and Location of Overseas R&D Activities by Multinational Enterprises’, World Development, 24(4), pp. 673-688.
Kumar, Nagesh (2001) ‘Determinants of Location of Overseas R&D Activity of Multinational Enterprises: The Case of US and Japanese Corporations’, Research Policy, 30, pp. 159-174.
Kumar, Nagesh and Aradhna Agarwal (2000) ‘ Liberalization, Outward Orientation and In-house R&D Activity of Multinational and Local Firms: A Quantitative Exploration for Indian Manufacturing’, RIS Discussion paper #07/20002.
Kumar, Nagesh and Mohammed Saqib (1996) ‘Firm Size, Opportunities for Adaptation, and In-house R&D Activity in Developing Countries: The Case of Indian Manufacturing’, Research Policy, 25(5), pp. 712-22.
Kumar, Nagesh and N. S. Siddharthan (1997) Technology, Market Structure and Internationalization: Issues and Policies for Developing Countries, Routledge and UNU Press, London and New York.
Kumar, Nagesh, and Jaya Prakash Pradhan (2002) ‘Economic Reforms, WTO and Indian Drugs and Pharmaceuticals Industry: Implications of Emerging Trends’ A Report prepared for the Centre for Multidisciplinary Development Research, Dharwad.
Lall, S. (1983) ‘Determinants of R&D in an LDC: The Indian Engineering Industry’, Economic Letters, 37 (3), pp.379-383.
Lall, S. (1983) ‘Multinationals from India’ in Lall (ed.) The New Multinationals: The Spread of Third World Enterprises, John Wiley & Sons, New York. pp. 21-87.
Lall, S. (1992) ‘Technological capabilities and industrialization’, World Development, 20, pp. 165-186.
McDonald, John F. and Robert A. Moffitt (1980) ‘The Uses of Tobit Analysis’, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 62, pp. 318-321.
Patel, P. and K. Pavitt (1995) ‘The Localized Creation of Global Technological Advantage’, J. Molero (ed.) Technological Innovation, Multinational Corporations and New International Competitiveness: The Case of Intermediate Countries, pp. 59-74, Germany: Harwood Academic Publishers.
Patel, P. and M. Vega (1999) ‘Patterns of Internationalization of Corporate Technology: Location vs. Home Country Advantages’, Research Policy, 28, pp. 145-155.
Siddharthan, N. S. (1988) ‘In-house R&D, Imported Technology, And Firm Size: Lessons from Indian Experience’, The Developing Economies, XXVI-3, pp. 212-221.
UNCTAD (2002) Host Country Operational Measures, United Nations, New York and Geneva.
Villela, A. (1983) ‘Multinationals from Brazil’ in Lall (ed.) The New Multinationals: The Spread of Third World Enterprises, John Wiley & Sons, New York, pp. 220-249.