Zakharenko, Roman (2009): Children Versus Ideas: an “Influential” Theory of Demographic Transition.
Download (205kB) | Preview
In this paper, I build on Blackmore (2000) to propose a formal theory of demographic transition (fertility decline) and associated growth of the stock of knowledge. The novelty of this theory is to entirely exclude private consumption from the objective function of the decision makers, and to assume that their goal is to maximize their social influence, that is, the number of people in the next generation utilizing their ideas. With high communication costs, one’s ideas are utilized mainly by his/her children, which creates an incentive to have as many children as possible. With modern communication technologies, one’s ideas can be used by millions, which makes people invest time into improvement of own ideas rather than production of children. Even those who can influence only their own children are induced to have smaller families and improve own ideas, because their children now have access not only to ideas of parents but also to ideas from the outside world.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Children Versus Ideas: an “Influential” Theory of Demographic Transition|
|Keywords:||demographic transition, social influence, economic growth|
|Subjects:||J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J1 - Demographic Economics > J13 - Fertility; Family Planning; Child Care; Children; Youth
O - Economic Development, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O15 - Human Resources; Human Development; Income Distribution; Migration
|Depositing User:||Roman Zakharenko|
|Date Deposited:||23. Sep 2009 16:50|
|Last Modified:||20. Feb 2013 15:33|
Axinn, William G. and Jennifer S. Barber, “Mass Education and Fertility Transition,” American Sociological Review, 2001, 66 (4), 481–505.
Axinn, William G. and Scott T. Yabiku, “Social Change, the Social Organization of Families, and Fertility Limitation,” The American Journal of Sociology, 2001, 106 (5), 1219–1261.
Becker, Gary, “An economic analysis of fertility,” in “Demographic and Economic Change in Developed Countries,” Princeton: National Bureau of Economic Research, 1960, pp. 209–231.
Becker, Gary S., Kevin M. Murphy, and Robert Tamura, “Human Capital, Fertility, and Economic Growth,” The Journal of Political Economy, 1990, 98 (5), S12–S37.
Behrman, Jere R., Hans-Peter Kohler, and Susan Cotts Watkins, “Social Networks and Changes in Contraceptive Use over Time: Evidence from a Longitudinal Study in Rural Kenya,” Demography, 2002, 39 (4), 713–738.
Blackmore, Susan, The meme machine, Oxford University Press, 2000.
Bongaarts, John and Susan Cotts Watkins, “Social Interactions and Contemporary Fertility Transitions,” Population and Development Review, 1996, 22 (4), 639–682.
Boyd, Robert and Peter J. Richerson, Culture and the evolutionary process, University of Chicago Press, 1985.
Caldwell, John C., “Toward A Restatement of Demographic Transition Theory.,” Population and Development Review, 1976, 2 (3/4), 321 – 366.
Cosmides, Leda and John Tooby, “Better than Rational: Evolutionary Psychology and the Invisible Hand,” The American Economic Review, 1994, 84 (2), 327–332.
Dawkins, Richard, The Selfish Gene, third ed., Oxford University Press, 2006 (1976).
Galor, Oded and Omer Moav, “Natural Selection and the Origin of Economic Growth,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2002, 117 (4), 1133–1191.
Greksa, L. P., “Population growth and fertility patterns in an Old Order Amish settlement.,” Annals of Human Biology, 2002, 29 (2), 192 – 201.
Henrich, Joseph and Francisco J. Gil-White, “The evolution of prestige: freely conferred deference as a mechanism for enhancing the benefits of cultural transmission,” Evolution and Human Behavior, 2001, 22 (3), 165–196.
Kremer, Michael, “Population Growth and Technological Change: One Million B.C. to 1990,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1993, 108 (3), 681–716.
Newson, Lesley, Tom Postmes, S. E. G. Lea, and PaulWebley, “Why Are Modern Families Small? Toward an Evolutionary and Cultural Explanation for the Demographic Transition,” Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2005, 9 (4), 360–375.
Rae, John, Life of Adam Smith, ninth ed., Cosimo, Inc, 2006 (1895).
Tooby, John and Leda Cosmides, “The Psychological Foundations of Culture,” in Jerome H. Barkow, Leda Cosmides, and John Tooby, eds., The adapted mind: evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture, Oxford University Press, 1992, pp. 19–136.
Available Versions of this Item
- Children Versus Ideas: an “Influential” Theory of Demographic Transition. (deposited 23. Sep 2009 16:50) [Currently Displayed]