Mirdala, Rajmund (2009): Interest rate transmission mechanism of monetary policy in the selected EMU candidate countries. Published in: Panoeconomicus , Vol. 56, No. 3 (September 2009): pp. 359-377.
This is the latest version of this item.
Download (261kB) | Preview
The stable macroeconomic environment, as one of the primary objectives of the Visegrad countries in the 1990s, was partially supported by the exchange rate policy. Fixed exchange rate systems within gradually widen bands (Czech republic, Slovak republic) and crawling peg system (Hungary, Poland) were replaced by the managed floating in the Czech republic (May 1997), Poland (April 2000), Slovak republic (October 1998) and fixed exchange rate to euro in Hungary (January 2000) with broad band (October 2001). Higher macroeconomic and banking sector stability allowed countries from the Visegrad group to implement the monetary policy strategy based on the interest rate transmission mechanism. Continuous harmonization of the monetary policy framework (with the monetary policy of the ECB) and the increasing sensitivity of the economy agents to the interest rates changes allowed the central banks from the Visegrad countries to implement monetary policy strategy based on the key interest rates determination. In the paper we analyze the impact of the central banks’ monetary policy in the Visegrad countries on the selected macroeconomic variables in the period 1999-2008 implementing SVAR (structural vector autoregression) approach. We expect that higher sensitivity of domestic variables to interest rates shocks can be interpreted as a convergence of monetary policies in candidate countries towards the ECB’s monetary policy.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Interest rate transmission mechanism of monetary policy in the selected EMU candidate countries|
|Keywords:||monetary policy, short-term interest rates, structural vector autoregression, variance decomposition, impulse-response function|
|Subjects:||C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C3 - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models; Multiple Variables > C32 - Time-Series Models; Dynamic Quantile Regressions; Dynamic Treatment Effect Models
E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E5 - Monetary Policy, Central Banking, and the Supply of Money and Credit > E52 - Monetary Policy
|Depositing User:||Rajmund Mirdala|
|Date Deposited:||02. Oct 2009 10:19|
|Last Modified:||12. Feb 2013 18:13|
 Bayoumi, Tamin and Barry Julian Eichengreen. 1992. “Shocking Aspects of European Monetary Unification”, [NBER Working Paper, no. 3949.] Cambridge, National Bureau of Economic Research.
 Ben Arfa, Nabil. 2009. Analysis of Shocks Affecting Europe: EMU and some Central and Eastern Acceding Countries. In: Panoeconomicus, 56(1): 21-38.
 Clarida, Richard and Jordi Gali. 1994. “Sources of Real Exchange Rate Fluctuations: How Important Are Nominal Shocks?” Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 41, 1-56.
 Fujiwara, Ippei. 2003. “Has a Effect of a Monetary Policy Changed During 1990s?”, Osaka University, Discussion Paper no. 8, 1-48.
 Gerlach, Stefan and Frank Smets. 1995. “The Monetary Policy Transmission Mechanism: Evidence from the G-7 Countries”, Bank for International Settlements, Working Paper no. 26, 1-49.
 Gonda, Vladimír. 2006. “European Monetary Union in the Context of Global Processes in World Economy”, Journal of Economics (Ekonomický časopis), 54(4): 352-367.
 Herrmann, Sabine and Axel Jochem. 2003. “Real and Nominal Convergence in the Central and East European Countries”, Intereconomics, 38(6): 323-327.
 Iša, Jan and Ivan Okáli. 2008. “European Monetary Union, Optimum Currency Area and Possible Effects of the Slovakia’s Joining the Euro Area”, Politická ekonomie, 56(3): 318-344.
 Josifidis, Kosta, Jean-Pierre Allegret, and Emilija Beker Pucar. 2009. Monetary and Exchange Rate Regime Changes: The Case of Poland, Czech republic, Slovakia and Republic of Serbia. In: Panoeconomicus, 56(2): 199-226.
 Lisý, Ján and Eva Muchová. 2004. “Formation and Behaviour of Economic and Monetary Union as an Open Theoretical Issue (in Slovak)”, Journal of Economics (Ekonomický časopis), 52(4): 429-448.
 Mirdala, Rajmund. 2009. “Shocking aspects of monetary integration (SVAR approach)”. In: Journal of Applied Research in Finance, 1(1): 52-63
 Sousa, Joao Miguel and Andrea Zaghini. 2006. “Global Monetary Policy Shocks in the G5: A SVAR Approach”, Centre for Financial Studies, Working Paper no. 30, 1-25.
 Stavárek, Daniel. 2008. “Exchange Market Pressures in the Central European Countries from the Eurozone Membership Perspective”, South East European Journal of Economics and Business, 2(3): 7-18.
 Šikulová, Ivana. 2009. “Experience of the Selected Eurozone Member Countries and Posture of the potential member countries to Euro Adoption”, Institute of the Economic Research, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Working Paper no. 15, 1-25.
 Šindel, Jaromír and Stanislav Saroch. 2008. “The Political Economy of Exchange Rate Policy in Central and Eastern European Countries - Sector Approach”, Politická ekonomie, 56(1): 17-39.
Available Versions of this Item
Interest rate transmission mechanism of the monetary policy in the selected EMU candidate countries (SVAR approach). (deposited 14. Mar 2009 09:49)
- Interest rate transmission mechanism of monetary policy in the selected EMU candidate countries. (deposited 02. Oct 2009 10:19) [Currently Displayed]