Sharma, Chanchal Kumar (2003): The Federal Approach to FiscalDecentralisation: Conceptual Contours for Policy Makers. Published in: Loyola Journal of Social Sciences , Vol. Vol. (, No. No.(2) (December 2005): pp. 169-188.
Download (258kB) | Preview
Chanchal Kumar Sharma,in his paper demonstrates that in order for fiscal decentralisation to be effective, it must be approached federally. A federal approach is not a decentralised approach but a dynamically balanced approach; one that constantly keeps on adjusting the contrasting forces of centralisation and decentralisation to create a system that can ensure good governance in accordance with the rapidly changing global and local scenario. According to the author, the good governance of the present time has to be federally flexible and dynamically decentralised and institutions of fiscal federalism are crucial for achieving such a dynamic equilibrium. Fiscal decentralisation cannot be detached from the broader principles of fiscal federalism if it is to be successful, irrespective of the fact of whether it is being carried out in a federal or non-federal country. He argues that too much decentralisation or an overly strong central federal government precludes the survival of a constitutional federal state.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||The Federal Approach to FiscalDecentralisation: Conceptual Contours for Policy Makers|
|Keywords:||Federalism; Fiscal Decentralization; centralization|
|Subjects:||Z - Other Special Topics > Z0 - General
H - Public Economics > H1 - Structure and Scope of Government
H - Public Economics > H1 - Structure and Scope of Government > H11 - Structure, Scope, and Performance of Government
H - Public Economics > H7 - State and Local Government ; Intergovernmental Relations
H - Public Economics > H7 - State and Local Government ; Intergovernmental Relations > H77 - Intergovernmental Relations ; Federalism ; Secession
H - Public Economics > H8 - Miscellaneous Issues
H - Public Economics > H8 - Miscellaneous Issues > H83 - Public Administration ; Public Sector Accounting and Audits
|Depositing User:||Chanchal Kumar Sharma|
|Date Deposited:||07. Oct 2006|
|Last Modified:||23. Feb 2015 23:31|
Aghion, P. and P. Bolton. 1992. ‘An Incomplete Contracts Approach to Financial Contracting.’ Review of Economic Studies 59(3): 473-94. Ariyo, Ademola. 2003. ‘Theories of Federalism.’ Paper presented at Ad-Hoc Expert Group Meeting, 7-9 Oct, 2003, Addis Ababa, Economic Commission for Africa. Available at: http://www.tamilnation.org/conflictresolution/federalism/ariyo.pdf Azfar, O., S. Kähkönen, P. Meagher, and D. Rutherford. 1999. Decentralisation, Governance and Public Services: The Impact of Institutional Arrangements. College Park: University of Maryland, IRIS Center. Bahl, Roy. 1995. Worldwide Trends in Fiscal Decentralisation. Atlanta: Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University. _______ 1999. Implementation Rules for Fiscal Decentralisation. Atlanta: Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University Besley, Timothy and Stephen Coate. 2000. ‘Centralized versus Decentralised Provision of Local Public Goods: A Political Economy Analysis.’ NBER Working Paper 7084, Cambridge, Massachusetts: National Bureau of Economic Research. Blanchard, Olivier and Anderei Shleifer.2000. ‘Federalism With and Without Political Centralization: China Versus Russia.’ NBER Working Paper 7616, Cambridge, Massachusetts: National Bureau of Economic Research Block, Peter. 1993. Stewardship. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers. Boex, Jamie. 2001. An introductory Overview of Intergovernmental Fiscal relations. Atlanta: Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University. Boucher, Michel and Jean-Luc Migue. 2002. ‘Federal Grants under the Discipline of Global Forces.’ Paper presented at the AIMS/MEI/FCPP Conference on Equilization: Welfare Trap or Helping Hand? At Montréal, Canada, Oct.25, 2001. http://www.aims.ca/library/grants.pdf Campbell, Tim., G. Peterson and J. Brakarz. 1991. Decentralisation to Local Government in LAC: National Strategies and Local Response in Planning, Spending and Management. Washington, D.C.; Latin American and the Caribbean Technical Department. Regional Studies Program,World Bank. Cooke, Jacob E. 1961 (ed). The Federalist. Middletown, Connecticut.: Wesleyan University Press Cumberland, John H. 1981. ‘Efficiency and Equity in Interregional Environmental Management.’ Review of Regional Studies 11(2):1-9. Dafflon, Bernard. 1992. “The Assignment of Function to Decentralized Government: From Theory to Practice.” Environment and Planning: Government and Policy 10(3): 283-98. Dillinger, W. 1994. ‘Decentralization and its Implications for Urban Service Delivery.’ Urban Management and Municipal Finance Discussion Paper, No.16, Washington D.C.:World Bank. Dillinger, William and Steven B. Webb. 1999. ‘Fiscal Management in Federal Democracies: Argentina and Brazil.’ Economica 45 (3): 423-83. Elazar, Daniel J. 1966. American Federalism: The View from the States. New York: Harper and Row. _______ 1987. Exploring Federalism. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press. Fukasaku, Kiichiro and Luiz R. de Mello. 1998. ‘Fiscal Decentralization and Macroeconomic Stability: The Experience of Large Developing Countries and Transition Economies.’ In: Kiichiro Fukasaku and Ricardo Hausmann (eds.) Democracy, Decentralisation and Deficits in Latin America. Paris: Inter American Bank. Gallagher, Mark. 1998. Choices in Fiscal Federalism. Washington DC: Centre for Applied Studies in Economics, Development Technical Systems Inc. Gerring, John, Strom C. Thacker and Carola Moreno. 2004. Normative Models of Democratic Governance: Decentralism, Centralism, and Centripetalism. Boston: Boston University. Available at: www.bu.edu/sthacker/normmodels.pdf Gordon, Roger H. 1983. ‘An Optimal Taxation Approach to Fiscal Federalism.’ Quarterly Journal of Economics 98(4): 567-86. Hart, O.D. 1988. “Incomplete Contracts and the Theory of the Firm.” Journal of Law Economics, and Organization. 4(1): 119-39. Hayek, Friedrich A. von. 1948. Individualism and Economic Order. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Hommes, Rudolf. 1995. ‘Conflicts and Dilemmas of Decentralization.’ In: Michael Bruno and Boris Pleskovic, (eds.), Annual World Bank Conference on Development Economics 1995(331-50). Washington, D.C.: The World Bank. Inman, Robert P and Daniel L. Rubinfeld. 1992. “Fiscal Federalism in Europe: Lessons from the United States Experience.” European Economic Review 36 (2-3): 654-60. ____________ 1997. ‘Rethinking Federalism.’ Journal of Economic Perspectives. 11(4): 43-64. Keen, Michael. 1998. ‘Vertical Tax Externalities in the Theory of Fiscal Federalism.’ IMF Staff Papers 45 (3): 454-85. Lakoff, G. 1985. Women, Fire and Dangerous Things: What Categories Can Reveal about Mind. Chicago: Chicago University Press. Lane, Jan-Erik, and Svante Ersson. 1997. ‘Is Federalism Superior?’ In: B. Steunenberg and F. van Vught (eds), Political Institutions and Public Policy (85-113). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Lee, Dwight R. 1994. “Reverse Revenue Sharing: A Return to Fiscal Federalism” The CATO Journal 14(1): 75-86. Lijphart, Arend. 1999. Patterns of Democracy. Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven and London: Yale University Press. Madison, James. 1961. ‘The Federalist No. 45: Alleged Danger from the Powers of the Union to the State Governments Considered.’ (pp. 308-14) In: Jacob E. Cooke. (ed). The Federalist. Connecticut: Wesleyan University Press. Nathan, R. P. 1992. ‘Defining Modern Federalism.’ In: H. N. Scheiber (ed). North American and Comparative Federalism: Essays for the 1990s (89-99). Berkeley: University of California Press. North, D.C. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Oates, Wallace E. 1972. Fiscal Federalism. New York, NY: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich. _______ 1977. The Political Economy of Fiscal Federalism. Massachusetts: Lexington Books. _______ 1999. ‘An Essay on Fiscal Federalism.’ Journal of Economic Literature 37(3): 1120-49. Persson, Torsten and Guido Tabellini. 1996. “Federal Fiscal Constitutions: Risk Sharing and Moral Hazard.” Econometrica 64( 3): 623-46. Polishchuk, L. 2000. ‘Political Economy of Scale and Endogenous Rule of Law.’ Mimeo. IRIS Centre: University of Maryland. Prud’homme, Remy. 1995. ‘The Dangers of Decentralisation.’The World Bank Research Observer.10 (2): 201-20. Qian, Y., Barry Weingast. 1996. ‘China's Transition to Markets: Market-Preserving Federalism, Chinese Style.’ Journal of Policy Reform 1(1): 149-185. Qian, Y., Barry Weingast. 1997. ‘Federalism as Commitment to Market Preserving Federalism.’ Journal of Economic Perspectives 11(4):83-92. Riker, William. 1964. Federalism: Origins, Operation, Significance. Boston: Little Brown. ________ 1969. ‘Six Books in Search of a Subject or Does Federalism Exist and Does it Matter?’ Comparative Politics 2(1):135-46. _______ 1975. “Federalism.” In I. Greenstein and Nelson W. Polsby (eds) Handbook of Political Science, Vol. 5. (93-172) Reading, MA: Addison- Wesley. Rivlin, Alice M. 1992. Reviving the American Dream: The Economy, the States, and the Federal Government. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press. Schneider, Aaron. 2003. Who Gets What From Whom? The Impact of Decentralisation on Tax Capacity and Pro-Poor Policy. Brighton: Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex. Seabright, Paul. 1996. ‘Accountability and Decentralization in Government: An Incomplete Contracts Model.’ European Economic Review 40(1): 61-89. Shah, Anwar. 2004. ‘Fiscal Decentralization in Developing and Transition Economies: Progress, Problems and Promise.” Working Paper No. 3282. Washington, D.C.: World Bank Policy Research April. Smoke, P.J. 1994. Local Government Finance in Developing Countries: The Case of Kenya. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Stoner-Weiss, Kathryn. 2001. ‘The Limited Reach of Russia's Party System: Underinstitutionalization in Dual Transitions.’ Politics and Society 29 (3): 385-414 Ter-Minassian T. 1997. ‘Intergovernmental Fiscal Relations in a Macroeconomic Perspective: An Overview .’ In T. Ter-Minassian. (ed). Fiscal Federalism in Theory and Practice, (3-24) Washington, DC: IMF Tocqueville Alexis de. 1952. Oeuvres Completes. Paris: Gallimard. _______ 1990. Democracy in America, Vol.I. NY: Vintage Books. UNDP.1999. ‘Decentralisation: A Sampling of Definitions.’ Working Paper, UNDP. www.undp.org/eo/documents/ decentralisation_working_report.PDF. Watts, Ronald.L. 1998. “Federalism, Federal Political Systems and Federations.’ Annual Review of Political Science. 1(1):117-37. Weingast, Barry R. 1979. ‘A Rational Choice Perspective on Congressional Norms.’ American Journal of Political Science.23 (1): 245-62. Wheare, K.C. 1963. Federal Government, 4th edn. London: Oxford University Press. Wildasin, David. 1989. “Interjurisdictional Capital Mobility: Fiscal Externality and a Corrective Subsidy.” Journal of Urban Economics 25(2): 193-212. ______ 1996. “Comments on ‘Fiscal Federalism and Decentralization: A Review of Some Efficiency and Macroeconomic Aspects,’ by Vito Tanzi” In M. Bruno and B. Pleskovic (eds.), Annual World Bank Conference on Development Economics, (323–8) (Washington, DC: The World Bank). Wolman, H. 1990.’Decentralisation: What It Is and Why We Should Care.’ In: Bennett, R.J. (ed.) Decentralization, Local Government and Markets towards a Post-Welfare Agenda (29-43). Oxford: Clarendon Press, Oxford. World Bank. 2000. Entering the 21st Century: World Development Report, 1999- 2000. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Yilmaz, S.S. and Ebel, R.D. 2002. On Measurement and Impact of Fiscal Decentralisation. Washington D.C.: World Bank.