Towards a common standard: comparing European and American cities

Freeman, Alan (2005): Towards a common standard: comparing European and American cities. Published in: Greater London Authority Economics Working Papers No. 13 (2005)

Abstract

This paper assesses to what extent it is possible to construct standardised geographical definitions of cities that will allow American and European cities to be compared in a consistent manner.

It reproduces, in citable form and, for scholarly purposes, the report of the same name produced by the author for the Greater London Authority.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Keywords: City; global city; Functional Urban Region; Larger Urban Zone; Territorial Indicators; Metropolitan Region; pluralism
• Subjects: H - Public Economics > H7 - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations > H70 - General; R - Urban, Rural, and Regional Economics > R0 - General; J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J0 - General

References

Freeman A, 2004, US counties and European NUTS areas: some comparisons: GLA Economics internal note, GLA, London

Freeman, A., 2004, Working Paper 9: Measuring and Comparing World Cities, GLA, London

Hall P, 2004, Is the Greater South-East a Mega-City Region, paper presented at the Institute of Public Policy Research seminar on Sustainable Development in the South East, 10th December 2004. See http://www.ippr.org

Hall P, 1999, Planning for the Mega-City: a new Eastern Asian urban form?, in Brotchie J, Newton P, Hall P and Dickey J (eds) East-West Perspectives on 21st Century Urban Development: Sustainable Eastern and Western Cities in the New Millenium, 3-36. Aldershot: Ashgate.

IAURIF (Institute for Urban Planning and Development of the Paris Ile-de-France region), Cahiers de l’Iaurif, No 135. See www.iaurif.org/en/doc/studies/cahiers/cahier_135/index.htm

Mills, E. S. and Hamilton, B.W, 1994, Urban Economics, 5th ed., Harper Collins, New York

Office for National Statistics, 2004, Key Statistics for Urban Areas in the South East, London. Available at: www.statistics.gov.uk/downloads/census2001/ks_urban_south_east_part_1.pdf

Office of Management and Budget, 2000a, Standards for Defining Metropolitan and Micropolitan Areas: Notice, Federal Register, Wednesday 27 December 2000. Available at: www.census.gov/population/www/estimates/00-32997.pdf

Office of Management and Budget, 2000b, Alternative Approaches to defining metropolitan and nonmetropolitan areas: Notice, Federal Register, Vol 63 No 244

Parkinson M, Simmie J, Clark G and Verdonk H, 2004, Competitive European Cities: Where do the core cities stand?, Office of the Deputy Prime Minister, London

Pumain D, Saint-Julien T, Cattan N and Rozenblat C, 1992, The statistical concept of the town in Europe, Statistical document, Theme 3, Series E, Eurostat, Luxembourg

Simmie J, Blake N, Brownhill S, Glasson J, Holt R, Marshall T, Martin R, Westwood A, and Wood P, 2005, Realising the Full Economic Potential of London and the Core Cities, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford

Urban Audit II, 2004a, Demographic, economic and social data on 258 cities across Europe, Document 82/2004, 25 June 2004, Luxemburg. See Eurostat and Urban Audit’s home pages www.urbanaudit.org and www.europa.eu.int/comm/regional_policy/urban2/urban/audit/src/intro.html

Urban Audit, 2004b, Methodological Handbook. Luxemburg. See Eurostat and Urban Audit’s home pages: www.urbanaudit.org and www.europa.eu.int/comm/regional_policy/urban2/urban/audit/src/intro.html