McCloskey, Deirdre Nansen (2009): Britain, China, and the Irrelevance of Stage Theories.
Download (268kB) | Preview
Britain was first, though the classical (and many of the neoclassical) economists did not recognize that its course was beginning the factor of 16. The slow British growth in the 18th century proposed by Crafts and Harley is unbelievable, but however one assigns growth within the period 1700-1900 it is now plain that something unprecedented was happening. Only non-economists recognized it at the time. The central puzzle is why innovation did not fizzle out, as Mokyr has put it---as it had at other times and places. Productivity in cotton textiles, for example, grew at computer-industry rates, and continued to into the 20th century. But Europe’s lead was not permanent. The California School of Pomeranz and Goldstone and Allen and others have shown that China led the West in 1500, and maybe as late as 1750, then fell dramatically behind. It was the continuation of European growth in the 19th and 20th centuries that is strange and new. Explaining the Great Divergence requires focusing on non-European events in the 19th century---not some deep-seated European cultural superiority. On the other hand, Europe’s fragmented polity was an advantage, as shown in the swift uptake of the printing press. The way that non-European places like Japan or Botswana or India have been able to grow demonstrates that the stage theories popular in European thought from the 18th century to the present (for example, in modern growth theory) are mistaken. The metaphors of biological stages or human foot races are inapt, as in the business-school talk of “competitiveness” nowadays. The “rise” of non-European economies does not presage a “decline” or Europe or its offshoots, merely a borrowing of social and engineering technologies such as Europe once borrowed from elsewhere. The dignity and liberty of ordinary people stands in the middle of such “technologies.”
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Britain, China, and the Irrelevance of Stage Theories|
|Keywords:||industrial revolution, economic history, growth theory, productivity, Britain, China, non-European economies|
|Subjects:||N - Economic History > N1 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics; Industrial Structure; Growth; Fluctuations > N13 - Europe: Pre-1913
N - Economic History > N0 - General
|Depositing User:||Susan MacDonald|
|Date Deposited:||02. Nov 2009 06:07|
|Last Modified:||14. Feb 2013 00:43|
Adams, Henry. 1907 (published 1918). The Autobiography of Henry Adams. New York: Modern Library, 1931.
Allen, Robert C. 1977. "The Peculiar Productivity History of American Blast. Furnaces, 1840-1913." Journal of Economic History 37 (Sept): 605-633.
Allen, Robert C. 1983. “Collective Invention.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 4 (1, Jan.): 605-633.
Allen, Robert C. 1992. Enclosure and the Yeoman: The Agricultural Development of the South Midlands, 1450-1850. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Allen, Robert C. 2006. “The British Industrial Revolution in Global Perspective: How Commerce Created the Industrial Revolution and Modern Economic Growth.” Unpublished paper Nuffield College, Oxford University. At http://www.nuffield.ox.ac.uk/users/allen/ unpublished/econinvent-3.pdf
Appleby, Joyce Oldham. 1978. Economic Thought and Ideology in Seventeenth-Century England. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Ashton, Thomas S. 1948. The Industrial Revolution, 1760-1830. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Baechler, Jean. 1971. Les Origines du Capitalisme. Paris: Gallimard. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1975.
Balazs, Étienne. 1964. Chinese Civilization and Bureaucracy: Variations on a Theme. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Berg, Maxine, and Patricia Hudson. 1994. “Growth and Change: A Comment on the Crafts-Harley View of the Industrial Revolution.” Economic History Review 47: 147-149.
Berg, Maxine. 1985. The Age of Manufactures: Industry, Innovation and Work in Britain 1700-1820. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Boswell, James. 1791. The Life of Samuel Johnson, LL. D. In two volumes. London: J. M. Dent, 1949.
Boyd, John. 2008. “Multiscale Numerical Algorithms for Weather Forecasting and Climate Modeling: Challenges and Controversies.” Sian News (Newsjournal of the Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics) 41 (9): 1, 16 only.
Broadberry, Stephen N. 2003. “Labor Productivity.” In Mokyr, J. (ed.), Oxford Encyclopedia of Economic History.
Broadberry, Stephen N., and Douglas Irwin. 2006. "Labor Productivity in the United States and the United Kingdom During the Nineteenth Century." Explorations in Economic History 43: 257-279.
Bronk, Richard. 2009. The Romantic Economist: Imagination in Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Carus-Wilson, Eleanora M. 1941. “An Industrial Revolution of the Thirteenth Century.” Economic History Review 1st series 11: 39-60.
Chapman, Stanley D., and J. Butt. 1988. “The Cotton Industry, 1775-1856.” In Feinstein and Pollard 1988.
Clapham, John H. 1926. An Economic History of Modern Britain: The Early Railway Age. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Clegg, Cyndia Susan. 1997. Press Censorship in Elizabethan England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Collins, Harry. 1985. Changing Order: Replication and Induction in Scientific Practice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Cosgel, Metin M. , Thomas J. Miceli, and Jared Rubin. 2009. “Guns and Books: Legitimacy, Revolt and Technological Change in the Ottoman Empire.” Department of Economics, University of Connecticut, Storrs. Working Paper 2009-12. March.
Crafts, Nicholas F. R., and C. Knick Harley. 1992. “Output Growth and the British Industrial Revolution: a Restatement of the Crafts-Harley View." Economic History Review 45: 703-730.
Crafts, Nicholas F. R., and C. Knick Harley. 2004. “Precocious British Industrialization: A General Equilibrium Perspective." In British Exceptionalism: a Unique Path to the Industrial Revolution, edited by Leandro Prados de la Escosura. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Davies, Howard, and Paul D. Ellis. 2000. “Porter’s ‘Competitive Advantage of Nations’: Time for a Final Judgment?” Journal of Management Studies 37(8): 1189-1213.
Davies, R. S. W., and Sidney Pollard. 1988. “The Iron Industry, 1750-1850.” In Feinstein and Pollard 1988.
Diamond, Jared. 1997. Guns, Germs, and Steel: The Fates of Human Societies. New York: Random House.
Easterlin, Richard A. 1981. “Why Isn't the Whole World Developed?” Journal of Economic History 41(1): 1-19.
Easterlin, Richard A. 2003. “Living Standards.” In Mokyr, ed., Oxford Encyclopedia of Economic History.
Goldstone, Jack A. 2002a. “The Rise of the West—or Not? A Revision to Socio-economic History.” Sociological Theory 18 (2): 175-194.
Goldstone, Jack A. 2002b. “Efflorescences and Economic Growth in World History: Rethinking the ‘Rise of the West’ and the Industrial Revolution.” Journal of World History 13 (2002): 323-389.
Goldstone, Jack A. 2003. “Feeding the People, Starving the State: China’s Agricultural Revolution of the 17th-/18th Centuries.” Unpublished paper presented to the Global Economic History Network. Irvine, California.
Goldstone, Jack A. 2009. Why Europe? The Rise of the West in World History, 1500-1850. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Goody, Jack. 1996. The East in the West. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Harley, C. K. 1980. “Transportation, the World Wheat Trade and Kuznets Cycle.” Explorations in Economic History 17: 218-250.
Harley, C. K. 1993. “Reassessing the Industrial Revolution: A Macro View.” Pp. 171-226 in J. Mokyr, ed., The British Industrial Revolution: An Economic Perspective. Boulder: Westview.
Harris, John R. 1992. Essays in Industry and Technology in the Eighteenth Century: England and France. Aldershot, England and Burlington, Vermont: Ashgate Variorum.
Harris, John R. 1996. “Law, Espionage and Transfer of Technology from Eighteenth-Century Britain.” Pp. 123-136 in Robert Fox, ed. Technological Change: Methods and Themes in the History of Technology. Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers.
Harris, John R. 2000. Industrial Espionage and Technology Transfer: Britain and France in the 18th Century. CITY: Ashgate.
Hawke, G. R. 1970. Railways and Economic Growth in England and Wales 1840-1870. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hayek, Friedrich. 1945. “The Use of Knowledge in Society.” American Economic Review 35 (4): 519-30.
Hudson, Patricia, ed. 1989. Regions and Industries: A Perspective on Britain’s Industrial Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hudson, Patricia. 1986. The Genesis of Industrial Capital: A Study of the West Riding Wool Textile Industry c.7750-1850. Cambridge.
Hudson, Patricia. 1992. The Industrial Revolution. Sevenoaks, Kent: Edward Arnold.
Jacob, Margaret C. 2001. The Enlightenment: A Brief History. Boston and New York: Bedford/St.Martin’s.
Jones, Eric L 1981. The European Miracle: Environments, Economies, and Geopolitics in the History of Europe and Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jones, Eric L. 1988. Growth Recurring: Economic Change in World History. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Knight, Frank. 1923. “The Ethics of Competition.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, reprinted as pp. 33-67 in Knight 1935. The Ethics of Competition. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers, 1997.
Lattimore, Owen. 1940. Inner Asian Frontiers of China. New York: American Geographical Society.
Lehmann, Helmut T. 1970. “Introduction.” [Martin Luther’s] Three Treatises. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Fortress Press.
Levy, David M., and Sandra J. Peart. "The Secret History of the Dismal Science. Part I. Economics, Religion and Race in the 19th Century." January 22, 2001. Library of Economics and Liberty. 5 June. At http://www.econlib.org /library/Columns/LevyPeartdismal.html.
Levy, David M.. 2001. How the Dismal Science Got Its Name: Classical Economics & the Ur-Text of Racial Politics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Macaulay, Thomas Babbington. 1830. “Southey's Colloquies on Society.” Edinburgh Review, Jan. Reprinted in Critical, Historical, and Miscellaneous Essays by Lord Macaulay. Boston, 1860 (1881), Vol. II: 132-187.
Macfarlane, Alan. 1978. The Origins of English Individualism: The Family, Property, and Social Transition. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Macfarlane, Alan. 2000. The Riddle of the Modern World: Of Liberty, Wealth, and Equality. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Marx, Karl. 1867. Capital: A Critique of Political Economy. Vol. 1. F. Engels, ed. Trans. From 3rd German ed. by S. Moore and E. Aveling, 1887. New York: Modern Library, n.d.
Mathias, Peter. 1953 (1979). “An Industrial Revolution in Brewing, 1700-1830. Explorations in Entrepreneurial History 5: 208-224. Reprinted pp. 209-230 in Mathias, The Transformation of England: Essays in the Economic and Social History of England in the Eighteenth Century. New York: Columbia University Press, 1979.
McCloskey, Deirdre N. 1981. “The Industrial Revolution, 1780-1860: A Survey.” Chapter 6 in Floud and McCloskey eds., The Economic History of Britain, 1700-Present (1981), Vol. 1, pp. 103-127, reprinted in J. Mokyr, ed. Economic History and the Industrial Revolution (Rowman and Littlefield, 1985).
McCloskey, Deirdre N. 1991a. "History, Nonlinear Differential Equations, and the Problem of Narration." History and Theory 30: 21-36.
McNeill, William. H 1982. The Pursuit of Power: Technology, Armed Force, and Society Since A.D. 1000. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Mill, John Stuart. 1843. A System of Logic, Ratiocinative and Inductive. London: John W. Parker.
Mill, John Stuart. 1871. Principles of Political Economy and Taxation, Books IV and V. Donald Winch, ed. London: Penguin, 1970.
Mitchell, Brian, with the assistance of Phyllis Deane. 1962. Abstract of British Historical Statistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mokyr, Joel, ed. 2003. The Oxford Encyclopedia of Economic History. Six volumes. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press
Mokyr, Joel. 1990. The Lever of Riches: Technological Creativity and Economic Progress. New York: Oxford University Press.
Mokyr, Joel. 1999a. “Editor’s Introduction: The New Economic History and the Industrial Revolution.” Pp. 1-131 in Joel Mokyr, ed., The British Industrial Revolution: An Economic Perspective. Boulder: Westview Press.
Mokyr, Joel. 2002. The Gifts of Athena: Historical Origins of the Knowledge Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Mokyr, Joel. 2003. “Industrial Revolution.” In Mokyr, ed., Oxford Encyclopedia of Economic History.
Mokyr, Joel. 2007a. “The European Enlightenment, the Industrial Revolution, and Modern Economic Growth.” Max Weber Lecture, European University Institute, Bellagio, March 27, 2007. At http://faculty.wcas.northwestern.edu/~jmokyr/Florence-Weber.PDF
Mokyr, Joel. 2007b. “Discussion of Clark’s Farewell to Alms. ” Meet-the-Author Session at the Social Science History Convention, Chicago, November. http://eh.net/bookreviews /ssha_farewell_to_alms.pdf
Moore, Basil J. 2006. Shaking the Invisible Hand: Complexity, Endogenous Money and Exogenous Interest Rates. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Musson, A. E. 1978. The Growth of British Industry. New York: Holmes and Meier.
North, Douglass C. 1968. “Sources of Productivity Change in Ocean Shipping, 1600-1850.” Journal of Political Economy 76: 953-70.
Olmstead, Alan L., and Paul W. Rhode. 2008a. “Biological Innovation and Productivity Change in the Antebellum Cotton Economy.” Journal of Economic History 68: 1123-1171.
Olmstead, Alan L., and Paul W. Rhode. 2008b. Creating Abundance: Biological Innovation and American Agricultural Development. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Perdue, Peter. 2003. “Silk Road.” In Mokyr, ed. Oxford Encyclopedia of Economic History.
Persky, Joseph. 1990. “A Dismal Romantic.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 4 (Autumn): 165-172.
Polanyi, Michael. 1966. The Tacit Dimension. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday.
Pomeranz, Kenneth. 2000. The Great Divergence: China, Europe, and the Making of the Modern World Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Price, Richard. 1787. “The Evidence for a Future Period of Improvement in the State of Mankind.” http://www.constitution.org/price/price_7.htm
Schmoller, Gustav. 1884 (1897). “The Mercantile System and its Historical Significance.” A chapter from the English edition of 1897 of Studien uber die wirtschaftliche Politik. At http://socserv2.socsci. mcmaster.ca/~econ/ugcm/3ll3/ schmoller/mercant
Schumpeter, Joseph A. 1926 (1st ed. 1912; trans. 1934). The Theory of Economic Development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Schumpeter, Joseph A. 1954. History of Economic Analysis. Elizabeth B. Schumpeter, ed. New York: Oxford University Press.
Smith, Adam. 1776. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. Glasgow Edition. Campbell, Skinner, and Todd, eds. 2 vols. Indianapolis: Liberty Classics, 1976, 1981
Temin, Peter. 1997. “Two Views of the British Industrial Revolution." Journal of Economic History 57: 63-82.
Temin, Peter. 2000. “A Response to Harley and Crafts.” Journal of Economic History 60: 842-846.
Temple, Robert. 1986. The Genius of China. Forward by Joseph Needham. 3rd ed. 2007. London: Andre Deutsch.
Thurow, Lester C. 1985. The Zero-Sum Solution: Building a World-Class American Economy. New York” Simon and Schuster.
Tunzelmann, Nick von. 2003. “Technology.” In Mokyr, ed. Oxford Encyclopedia of Economic History.
Wex, Michael. 2006. Born to Kvetch: Yiddish Language and Culture in All of Its Moods. New York: Harper Perennial.
Winchester, Simon. 2008. The Man Who Loved China. New York: HarperCollins.