Konow, James (2009): Adam Smith and Moral Knowledge.
Download (97Kb) | Preview
This paper examines the contribution of The Theory of Moral Sentiments to the study of how we acquire moral knowledge. In Smith, this is associated with the moral judgment of an impartial spectator, a hypothetical ideal conjured in the imagination of an agent. This imagined spectator has the properties of impartiality, information and sympathy. I argue Smith develops this construct in the context of personal ethics, i.e., as a guide to moral conduct in personal relationships. There are limitations, however, to this model for personal ethics, as acknowledged by Smith himself and suggested by subsequent social science findings. Moreover, this model does not necessarily extend to social ethics, i.e., to moral judgment in less personal economic and social interactions, such as firms, industries and governments. Hence, I propose modifying the spectator model in light of modern social science methods and of Smith’s own insights to address its limitations for personal ethics and to provide it with a foundation for social ethics. The proposed approach is based on a quasi-spectator, i.e., the empirical analysis of the moral views of real spectators whose properties approximate those of the ideal spectator. A review of quasi-spectator studies suggests this as a promising method for informing both descriptive and prescriptive ethics.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Adam Smith and Moral Knowledge|
|Keywords:||Adam Smith, ethics, moral knowledge|
|Subjects:||B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B3 - History of Economic Thought: Individuals > B31 - Individuals
B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B1 - History of Economic Thought through 1925 > B12 - Classical (includes Adam Smith)
A - General Economics and Teaching > A1 - General Economics > A12 - Relation of Economics to Other Disciplines
D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics > D60 - General
|Depositing User:||James Konow|
|Date Deposited:||12. Nov 2009 09:30|
|Last Modified:||12. Feb 2013 12:41|
Ashraf, Nava, Camerer, Colin, and Loewenstein, George (2005). "Adam Smith, Behavioral Economist." Journal of Economic Perspectives 11 (Summer): 109-26.
Babcock, Linda, and Loewenstein, George (1997). "Explaining Bargaining Impasse: The Role of Self-Serving Biases." Journal of Economic Perspectives 11 (Winter): 109-26.
Brown, Vivienne (1994). Adam Smith's Discourse: Canonicity, Commerce and Conscience. London: Routledge.
Brown, Vivienne (2008). “Agency and Discourse: Revisiting the Adam Smith Problem,” discussion paper 72, The Open University.
Cappelen, Alexander, Konow, James, Sørensen, Erik, and Tungodden, Bertil (2009). “Just Luck: An Experimental Study of Fairness and Risk Taking.” Manuscript.
Croson, Rachael, and Konow, James (2009). “Social Preferences and Moral Biases.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization vol. 69 (3): 201-212.
Easterlin, Richard A. (1995). “Will Raising the Incomes of All Increase the Happiness of All?.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization vol. 27 (1): 35-47.
Elster, Jon (1998). Deliberative democracy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Festinger, Leon (1957). A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Fleischacker, Samuel (1999). A Third Concept of Liberty: Judgment and Freedom in Kant and Adam Smith. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Fleischacker, Samuel (2004). On Adam Smith's Wealth of Nations: A Philosophical Companion. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Fleischacker, Samuel (2009). “True to Ourselves? – Adam Smith on Self-Deceit,” manuscript, Philosophy Department, University of Illinois, Chicago.
Fleurbaey, Marc, Schokkaert, Eric, and Decancq, Koen (2009). “What Good is Happiness?” ECORE Discussion paper 2009/38, Université catholique de Louvain.
Fricke, Christel, and Schütt, Hans-Peter (2005). Adam Smith Als Moralphilosoph. Berlin, New York: Walter de Gruyter, Inc.
Hanley, Ryan Patrick (2008). "Enlightened Nation Building; the ‘Science of the Legislator’ in Adam Smith and Rousseau." American Journal of Political Science 52 (April): 219-34.
Haberrnas, Jürgen (1983). Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action. Trans. Christian Lenhardt and Shierry Weber Nicholson. Cambridge, Mass: MIT press.
Harrison, John (1995). "Imagination and Aesthetics in Adam Smith's Epistemology and Moral Philosophy." Contributions to Political Economy 14: 91-112.
Kawall, John G. (2006). “On Moral Epistemology of Ideal Observer Theories.” Ethical Theory and Moral Practice vol. 9 (3): 359-374.
Konow, James (2000). "Fair Shares: Accountability and Cognitive Dissonance in Allocation Decisions." American Economic Review 90 (September): 1072-92.
Konow James (2003). “Which is the fairest one of all?: a positive analysis of justice theories.” Journal of Economic Literature 41(4): 1186-1237.
Konow, James (2009a). Is Fairness in the Eye of the Beholder?: An Impartial Spectator Analysis of Justice.” Social Choice and Welfare, 33(1): 101-127.
Konow, James (2009b). “The Moral High Ground: An Experimental Study of Spectator Impartiality.” Manuscript.
Konow, James, Saijo, Tatsuyoshi, and Akai, Kenju (2009). “Morals Versus Mores: Experimental Evidence on Equity and Equality.” Manuscript.
Loewenstein, George, and Deborah A. Small (2007). "The Scarecrow and the Tin Man: The Vicissitudes of Human Sympathy and Caring." Review of General Psychology 11.2 (June): 1-15.
Mikula, Gerold, Editor (1980). Justice and Social Interaction: Experimental and Theoretical Contributions from Psychological Research. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Ordóñez, Lisa D., and Barbara A. Mellers (1993). "Trade-Offs in Fairness and Preference Judgments." In Psychological Perspectives on Justice, edited by Barbara A. Mellers and Jonathan Baron. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 138-54.
Raphael, D. D. (2007). The Impartial Spectator. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Rasmussen, Dennis C. (2006). "Does ‘Bettering Our Condition’ Really Make Us Better Off? Adam Smith on Progress and Happiness." American Political Science Review 100.3 (August): 309-18.
Rasmussen, Dennis C. (2008). "Whose Impartiality? Which Self-interest? Adam Smith on Utility, Happiness and Cultural Relativism," The Adam Smith Review 4: 247-253.
Rawls, John (1971). A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Rawls, John (2000). Lectures on the History of Moral Philosophy. Cambridge, London: Harvard University Press.
Rothschild, Emma, and Sen, Amartya (2006). “Adam Smith's Economics,” in The Cambridge Companion to Adam Smith. Ed. K. Haakonssen, Cambridge University Press, New York: 319-365.
Schwitzgebel, Eric (2008). "The Unreliability of Naive Introspection." Philosophical Review 117.2: 245-73. Sen, Amartya (2009). The Idea of Justice. Cambridge: The Belknap Press.
Smith, Adam (1759). The Theory of Moral Sentiments. Glascow: R. Chapman.
Sugden, Robert (2002). "Beyond Sympathy and Empathy: Adam Smith’s Concept of Fellow-Feeling." Economics and Philosophy 18.1 (April): 63-87.
Sulkin, Tracy, and Simon, Adam F. (2001). "Habermas in the Lab: A Study of Deliberation in an Experimental Setting." Political Psychology 22.4 (December): 809-26.
Sunstein, Cass R. (2002). "The Law of Group Polarization." Journal of Political Philosophy 10.2: 175-195.
Thaler, Richard H., and Shefrin, H.M. (1981). "An Economic Theory of Self-Control." Journal of Political Economy 89.21 (April): 392-406.
Verburg, Rudi (2000). “Adam Smith’s Growing Concern on the Issue of Distributive Justice” European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 7: 23-44.
Veenhoven, Ruut (1991). “Is Happiness Relative?” Social Indicators Research vol. 24: 1-34.
Weinstein, Jack Russell (2006). “Sympathy, Difference, and Education: Social Unity in the Work of Adam Smith,” Economics and Philosophy 22.1: 79-111.
Witztum, Amos (1997). “Distributive Considerations in Smith’s Conception of Economic Justice,” Economics and Philosophy 13.2: 241-259.
Zagzebski, Linda (2004). Divine Motivation Theory. New York: Cambridge University Press.