Compatibility of the Content of Bachelor Programs in Public Administration with the Needs of Good Governance - A Comparison: EU-US

Matei, Lucica and Matei, Ani (2009): Compatibility of the Content of Bachelor Programs in Public Administration with the Needs of Good Governance - A Comparison: EU-US.

Abstract

Higher education in most European states is subject to a complex process of adaptation to the requirements formulated by Bologna process. For some states, such as Romania, this process assumes core restructuring of the content, aimed to its compatibility with that from prestigious European universities. For education in public administration, the developments have a specific character, benefiting of European mechanisms of evaluation, aimed to describe the degree of compatibility.

One of the mechanisms is provided by the European Association for Public Administration Accreditation, taking into consideration complex evaluation standards and criteria in view of accreditation.

Multidisciplinarity represents one of the important standards. Based on the general context of developing the programs in public administration, we may speak about Europeanization of their content; Europeanization reveals exactly the degree of absorption of the European values specific for the area of public administration in national higher education institutions.

The Europeanization process represents a complex process that can cover several years and means step by step approaches by which the structure and content of the above programs should be convergent.

In this context, the current paper aims a comparative analysis, based on statistic methods, providing an image about the current level of Europeanization of the content of programs in public administration between various universities in Romania, states in Central and Eastern Europe recently accessed into the European Union and developed countries in the European Union.

Based the research methodology and using NASPA standards, our analysis will include American universities that are developing programs in public administration.

Thus, the structure of the paper will comprise:

-General framework for developing the European higher education after signing Bologna Declaration. -Research methodology based on EAPAA standards. -Presenting the results of the statistic analysis for 10 universities in Romania, 4 universities in Central and Eastern Europe and 4 universities in European developed states. -Comparing the results with those from 3-4 American universities and describing the relevant conclusions from the perspective of the content specific for governance issue.

The paper uses information and reports of European and American universities about the content and development of programs in public administration as well as own studies of the authors

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: higher education, curricular compatibility, good governance
• Subjects: A - General Economics and Teaching > A2 - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics > A23 - Graduate; H - Public Economics > H8 - Miscellaneous Issues > H83 - Public Administration ; Public Sector Accounting and Audits; I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I2 - Education and Research Institutions > I23 - Higher Education ; Research Institutions; H - Public Economics > H8 - Miscellaneous Issues > H89 - Other

References

Adelman, C.,2009, The Bologna Process for U.S. Eyes: Re-learning Higher Education in the Age of Convergence, Washington, DC: Institute for Higher Education Policy. Reference:www.ihep.org/Research/GlobalPerformance.cfm.;

Frederickson, G.H.,2005, Whatever Happened to Public Administration? Governance, Governance Everywhere, in The Oxford Handbook of Public Management, ed. Ewan Ferlie, Laurence E. Lynn and Christopher Pollitt, Oxford University Press. pp. 282 – 304;

Jabes, J.,2008, On the Way to Bologna: Developments in Public Policy Programs in Europe, in Public Administration and Public policy Degree Programmes in Europe: The Road from Bologna, ed. Gyorgy Jenei and Karoly Mike, NISPAcee Press, Bratislava, p.11-25;

Karseth, B.,2006, Curriculum Restructuring in Higher Education after the Bologna Process: A New Pedagogic Regime? The Third Conference on Knowledge and Politics at the University of Bergen, May 18-20th, 2005, in Revista Española de Educación Comparada, 12 (2006), pp.255-284;

Matei, A.,2005, Measures to Implement the Provisions of Bologna Declaration. Bucharest: SNSPA Press;

Matei, L.,2007, Europeanisation of Higher Education in the Area of Administrative Sciences in Romania, in Lesson and Recommendations for Improvement: Central and Eastern European Public Administration and Public Policy, ed. Juraj Nemec, NISPAcee Press, Bratislava, pp.87-131;

Matei, L.,2008, Europeanization or Curricular Harmonization in the Area of Administrative Sciences in Romania (follow-up of Bologna Process). Comparative Analysis and Empirical Research, in Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, nr.22E / February / 2008, pp.92-125;

Nemec, J.,2008, Accreditation Process in Slovakia and Neighbouring Countries in Central Europe: Current Problems and Possible Improvements, in Public Administration and Public Policy Degree Programmes in Europe: The Road from Bologna, ed. Gyorgy Jenei and Karoly Mike, NISPAcee Press, Bratislava, pp.47-51;

Phelps, R.P., Dietrich,G.L., Phillips, G. and McCormack, K.A.,2003, Higher Education: An International Perspective, pp14, 15. Location reference: http://www.thirdeducationgroup.org/Review/Resources/IntlHigherEducation.htm;

Pollitt, Ch. and Bouckaert, G.,2000, Public Management Reform, Oxford, Oxford University Press;

Raffel, J.,A.,2007, The Uniqueness of NASPAA-Accredited Programs: The Role of Public Service in Accreditation, Location reference: http://naspaa.org;

Rhodes, R.A.W.,1997, Understanding Governance: Policy Networks, Reflexivity and Accountability, Open University Press, Buckingham;

Guri-Rosenblit,S.,2007, Higher Education in the 21st Century: Seven Pairs of Contrasting Trends, in Towards a cartography of higher education policy change, CHEPS, University of Twente, the Netherlands, p.309;

Guri-Rosenblit, S. and Sebkova, H.,2004, Diversification of Higher Education Systems: Patterns, Trends and Impacts, UNESCO Occasional Forum Series, Paper No. 6 - Diversification of Higher Education and the Changing Role of Knowledge and Research, Paris: UNESCO Forum of Higher Education, Research and Knowledge, pp. 40-69;

Scott, P.,2009, Access in Higher Education in Europe and North America: Trends and Developments, UNESCO Forum on Higher Education in the Europe Region: Access, Values, Quality and Competitiveness, 21-24 May 2009, Bucharest, Romania;

Usher, A.,2009, Ten Years Back and Ten Years Forward: Developments and Trends in Higher Education in Europe Region, UNESCO Forum on Higher Education in the Europe Region: Access, Values, Quality and Competitiveness, 21-24 May ,2009, Bucharest, Romania;

Commission of the European Communities ,2003, The Role of the Universities in the Europe of Knowledge. Brussels: European Commission;

European Commission ,2008, Eurostat Yearbook 2008: Europe in Figures (Tertiary Education, Lifelong Learning), Brussels pp. 173-179, 180-182;

OECD ,2008, OECD Statistical Extracts: Education and Training (Students enrolled by type of institution: tertiary education and advanced research programmes, Graduates by level of education: tertiary education and advanced research programmes), Paris, http://stats.oecd.org/WBOS/index;

UNESCO ,2003, Report on Trends and Developments in Higher Education in Europe.