Matei, Ani and Dinu, Teodora (2009): Improvement of Government Financing through Non-Conventional Methods: Reducing the Administrative Costs in the Public Sector.
Download (367kB) | Preview
The paper aims to emphasize the relative recent preoccupations of several European states and even of EU about reducing the administrative costs and contribution of this process to local and national development, increasing the GDP etc.
Recent appreciations of the European officials reveal estimations that a reduction by 25% of the administrative costs could lead to an increase of GDP by 2-3%.
Mechanisms of coordination for national policies are already operational even if their results are not yet visible.
Oriented mainly towards the private sector, the issue of reducing the administrative costs remains up-to-date also in the public sector. Moreover, even in the context of the current economic crisis, the reduction of the administrative costs represents an important resource for financing the development of the public sector at local level and the macro-economic policies.
Therefore, in this context, the paper comprises:
-Synthetic and comparative analyses about the content and results of the national policies for reducing the administrative costs. -Considerations concerning the enlargement of the mentioned policies on the economic and social processes specific for the public sector. -Models to evaluate the impact of reducing the administrative costs on financing the public sector, based on input-output analysis materialised through the production function. -Emphasizing the effects on long term of reducing the administrative costs and substantiating the policies for financing national or local governance
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Improvement of Government Financing through Non-Conventional Methods: Reducing the Administrative Costs in the Public Sector|
|English Title:||Improvement of Government Financing through Non-Conventional Methods: Reducing the Administrative Costs in the Public Sector|
|Keywords:||administrative costs, EU policies and programs, public sector|
|Subjects:||H - Public Economics > H7 - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations > H72 - State and Local Budget and Expenditures
H - Public Economics > H5 - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies > H53 - Government Expenditures and Welfare Programs
G - Financial Economics > G2 - Financial Institutions and Services > G28 - Government Policy and Regulation
|Depositing User:||ANI I MATEI|
|Date Deposited:||30. Nov 2009 07:42|
|Last Modified:||13. Feb 2013 07:49|
Andrei,T., Matei,A., Stancu,I., Andrei,C., 2009), "Socioperformanta reformei sistemului public de sănătate”, Economica Publishing House, Bucharest, Romania;
Bailey, St.J., (2002), “Public Sector Economics, Theory, Policy and Practice”, second edition, Palgrave, New York;
Connolly, S., Munro, A., (1999), “Economics of the Public Sector”, Prentice Hall Europe, London, New York, Paris;
Dobrotă, N. (coord.), (1999), “Dicţionar de economie”, Economica Publishing House, Bucharest, Romania;
Evans, Ch., (2003), “Studying the Studies: An Overview of Recent Research into Taxation Operating Cost.” eJournal of Tax Research 1 (1): 64–92. Atax, University of New South Wales;
Gelauff, G., M., M., Lejour, A., M., (2005), “Five Lisbon highlights: the economic impact of reaching these targets”, CPB Document 104, CPB, The Hague;
Lipsey, R.G., Chrystal, K.A., (1999), “Economie pozitivă”, Romanian translation, Economica Publishing House, Bucharest, Romania;
Matei, A., (2003), “Economie publică. Analiza economică a deciziilor publice”, Economica Publishing House, Bucharest, Romania;
Matei, A., (2008), “Performance of the Public Expenditure Management at Local Level in Romania”, Transylvania Review of Administrative Sciences, no. 23E/ Journal, Cluj – Napoca, Romania;
Matei, A., Matei, L., Dinu, T., (2009), “Marketing of Local Public Services under the Reduction of Administrative Expenditures”, Theoretical and Applied Economics, no. 3 (532), March, Bucharest, Romania;
Matei, Lucica, (2005), “Management public”, second edition, Economica Publishing House, Bucharest, Romania;
Mourre, G. (2008), “What Drives Income Differentials, Underutilisation of Labour and Economic Growth in Europe? A Detailed GDP Accounting Exercise”, Manuscript, Free University of Brussels, taken from COM(2008) 774 final;
Musqrave R.A., (1974), “Expenditure Policy for Development”, University of Florida Press, U.S.A.;
Rostow W., W., (1960), “The Stages of Economic Growth: A Non – Communist Manifesto”, Cambridge University Press, U.K.;
Stiglitz, J.E., (2000), “Economics of the Public Sector”, third edition, W.W.Norton & Company, New York/ London;
Tuan Minh Le, Duc Minh Pham, Luc De Wulf, (2007), “Estimating Economic Benefits for Revenue Administration Reform Projects”, World Bank, PREM Note, Public Sector Governance, March, no. 112;
European Commission, (2005), “Communication on Better Regulation for Growth and Jobs in the European Union, Minimizing Administrative Costs Imposed by Legislation”, Staff Working Paper, SEC(2005)175;
European Commission, (2005), “EU common methodology for assessing administrative costs imposed by legislation”, COM(2005) 518;
European Commission, (2006), “Measuring administrative costs and reducing administrative burdens in the European Union”, Commission working document COM(2006) 691;
European Commission, (2006), “Measuring administrative costs and reducing administrative burdens in the European Union”, COM(2006) 691;
Government of Australia, Department of Treasury & Finance (DTF), (2007), “Estimate of Victoria’s Administrative Burden”, DTF Internal Working Paper;
Government of Romania, (2008), “Strategy for better regulation at central government level”, 2008 – 2013, www.sgg.gov.ro;
I.M.F., (2004), “Integrating Tax and Social Security Contributions Collection within a Unified Administration”, IMF Working Paper, December;
OECD – CTPA, (2008), “Program to Reduce the Administrative Burden of Tax Regulation in Selected Countries”, Forum on Tax Administration: Taxpayer Services Sub-Group Information Note;
SCM Network, (2005), “International Standard Cost Model Manual – measuring and reducing administrative burdens for business”;
UK, Better Regulation Executive, (2005), “Measuring Administrative Costs: UK Standard Cost Model Manual”, version 1.01;
WIFO – CEPS, (2006), “Pilot project on administrative burden”, October;
World Bank, (2002), “Global Economic Prospects and the Developing Countries.” World Bank, Washington, DC. 22.