Reforming Social Security: Issues and Challenges for Personal Retirement Accounts

Pfau, Wade Donald (2007): Reforming Social Security: Issues and Challenges for Personal Retirement Accounts. Published in: East and West Studies , Vol. 19, No. 1 (July 2007): pp. 215-242.

Abstract

We seek to analyze a number of important issues related to the ownership of government pensions. In the United States, Social Security is operated on a pay-as-you-go basis, with some limited pre-funding to prepare for the baby boom retirement. Moving toward more of a defined contribution system will require accounting for many details. Social Security will still need to find ways to cover its unfunded liabilities to past and present retirees, as well as to workers who have paid into the system. There are also many issues which will need to be clarified regarding the ownership of personal accounts: will participation be voluntary or mandatory, will annuitization be required, and how freely can participants choose their investment strategy. An assessment of personal accounts must also fully incorporate the role of disability benefits and survivor benefits. Finally, what will happen in the new system if the accounts do not achieve their expected returns? We use the example of the United States to highlight many important issues faced by countries looking to use defined-contribution pensions as a response to aging populations.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Social Security Reform; Personal Retirement Accounts; Public Finance
• Subjects: H - Public Economics > H5 - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies > H55 - Social Security and Public Pensions

References

Baker, Dean (1998): “The Full Returns from Social Security,” The Century Foundation / Economic Policy Institute.

Bosworth, Barry, and Gary Burtless (2002): “Economic and Distributional Effects of the Proposals of President Bush’s Social Security Commission.” Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institute.

Burtless, Gary (2000): “Social Security Privatization and Financial Market Risk,” Center on Social and Economic Dynamics Working Paper No. 10.

Cato Institute (1999): “Do I Have a Right to Social Security?” Daily Briefing for January 13, 1999. Available from http://www.socialsecurity.org/daily/01-13-99.html.

Cogan, John F., and Olivia S. Mitchell (2002): “The Role of Economic Policy in Social Security Reform: Perspectives from the President’s Commission,” NBER Working Paper Series, No. 9166. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

Diamond, Peter A., and Peter R. Orszag (2002): “An Assessment of the Proposals of the President’s Commission to Strengthen Social Security,” NBER Working Paper Series, No. 9097. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

Feldstein, Martin, and Elena Rangelova (2001): “Individual Risk in an Investment-Based Social Security System,” NBER Working Paper Series, No. 8074. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

Feldstein, Martin, and Jeffrey Liebman (2000): “The Distributional Effects of an Investment-Based Social Security System,” NBER Working Paper Series, No. 7492. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

Geanakoplos, John, Olivia S. Mitchell, and Stephen P. Zeldes (1998a): “Social Security Money’s Worth,” NBER Working Paper Series, No. 6722. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

Geanakoplos, John, Olivia S. Mitchell, and Stephen P. Zeldes (1998b): “Would A Privatized Social Security System Really Pay a Higher Rate of Return?” NBER Working Paper Series, No. 6713. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

Goss, Stephen C., and Alice H. Wade (2002): “Estimates of Financial Effects for Three Models Developed by the President’s Commission to Strengthen Social Security,” Memorandum.

Gustman, Alan L., and Thomas L. Steinmeier (2002): “The New Social Security Commission Personal Accounts: Where is the Investment Principal,” NBER Working Paper Series, No. 9045. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

Pfau, Wade D. (2006): “Comparing the Impacts of Social Security Benefit Reductions on the Income Distribution of the Elderly,” National Tax Journal 59:2 (June): p. 195-210.

President’s Commission to Strengthen Social Security (2001): Strengthening Social Security and Creating Personal Wealth for All Americans. Washington, D.C.

Shiller, Robert J. (2005): “The Life-Cycle Personal Accounts Proposal for Social Security: A Review,” NBER Working Paper Series, No. 11300. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

Social Security Administration Board of Trustees (2005): Annual Report of the Board of Trustees of the Federal Old-Age and Survivors Insurance and Disability Insurance (OASDI) Trust Funds. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.

Swendiman, Kathleen S., and Thomas J. Nicola (2005): “Social Security Reform: Legal Analysis of Social Security Benefit Entitlement Issues,” CRS Report for Congress. Washington, D.C.: The Congressional Research Service.

Walliser, Jan (1998): “Social Security Privatization and the Annuities Market,” Washington, DC: Congressional Budget Office.